Mech
Cipher
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2004
- Messages
- 635
Ooh, a square.Vault Dweller said:
Thats so much better.
Ooh, a square.Vault Dweller said:
Vault Dweller said:
Triangular would cool too. There is a different type of portal in the main quest if you haven't played that far yet. I liked that design as well.sheek said:Vault Dweller said:
Lol. Why the hell would a portal be circle shaped?
A triangular or pentagonal portal is also possible... such a lack of imagination should be a cause of concern.
Vault Dweller said:Hence, my previous point about shapes. The shape is irrelevant, the style isn't. Oblivion gates could have been a triangle and still looked like a D2 rip-off.
We apologize for the inconvinience caused by the obviously unprofessional review. The reviewer has been warned not to express his personal opinions in reviews and will be following PR material sent to us in the future. Thank you for visiting us.HoodRich said:I haven't followed this game's development, but in this forum who couldn't miss it? The review was odd. It's like he's more concerned with making fun of the developer's silly PR talk than he is with the actual game. And it reads like something I'd expect from a blog, or a forum post. Kind of like whining that you didn't like the game instead of providing a thorough analysis of its highs and lows. Who cares about dual wielding or crossbows? Who cares if the reward for being the boss of a faction doesn't get you the coolest reward ever?
HoodRich said:I haven't followed this game's development, but in this forum who couldn't miss it? The review was odd. It's like he's more concerned with making fun of the developer's silly PR talk than he is with the actual game. And it reads like something I'd expect from a blog, or a forum post. Kind of like whining that you didn't like the game instead of providing a thorough analysis of its highs and lows. Who cares about dual wielding or crossbows? Who cares if the reward for being the boss of a faction doesn't get you the coolest reward ever?
HoodRich said:I haven't followed this game's development, but in this forum who couldn't miss it? The review was odd. It's like he's more concerned with making fun of the developer's silly PR talk than he is with the actual game.
Kind of like whining that you didn't like the game instead of providing a thorough analysis of its highs and lows.
Who cares about dual wielding or crossbows?
Who cares if the reward for being the boss of a faction doesn't get you the coolest reward ever?
Saint_Proverbius said:Well, I'm not so sure I liked that either. However, I definitely agree that somewhere in this vast, wonderful world wide web, there should be an article that points out all the bullshit hype about the game that was stated during the development versus the end product.
... softdrink company hyped...
Saint_Proverbius said:As opposed to most reviews which are just artificial highs, you mean?
Saint_Proverbius said:crossbows
Saint_Proverbius said:Because being the head of something should probably get you something important.
Are the bows good? Do they work? It seems Vault Dweller liked them. Even if he didn't, why mention crossbows anyway instead of why the bows weren't good? Can I complain about a lack of boomeranges and frisbees?
HoodRich said:...Who cares about dual wielding or crossbows? Who cares if the reward for being the boss of a faction doesn't get you the coolest reward ever?
Don't be so anal, you know what sort of "realism" games like Oblivion are aiming for. It'd be "illogical" if the turning point in warfare history was the introduction of the vorpal dessertspoon, but by your line of reasoning it'd fit right into Oblivion right?HoodRich said:a LOGICAL world...
A world with dragons, warp gates to hell and magic isn't very logical to begin with.
LlamaGod said:It would be like making a Vietnam game without M-16s or something.
HoodRich said:Ha. Yea I know. You should also know what I mean, the fact that it is still a game, not real life, and the option of another ranged weapon doesn't really matter. Besides I thought since it was an RPG that the RPG parts would be more talked about than stupid things like crossbows. But really quit latching onto the whole weapon thing. It was just one little part.
LlamaGod said:They still maintain a lore and 'game world' and it's a retarded game world if they never got around to using spears and crossbows, since they were pretty damned useful for what they were used for.
Saint_Proverbius said:Me, because I typically tend to favor crossbows in most fantasy games so long as the design doesn't totally screw them over.