The downright fucking HILARIOUS: This is easily going to be Obsidian doing Bethesda better than Bethesda.
I don't mean to sound cocky but I think pretty much everybody who attempted to make a Bethesda game did better job than Bethesda.
Really!? Mention one Bethesda-like game which sold more than Skyrim or F4.
Yeah, because my point was about money made
Your point was about a "better job" which implies not only a quality game but a game which brings more money in the end.
Anyway I know what you mean but I guess I don't like the cocky attitude.
You are not wrong, technically. Implied are many thing, including the hardship of game development in Maryland, US of A. However I don't see how stating the super-obvious (that Bethesda is rich because the core formula is appealing, because they were first to make it, because they were the only one making it for many years, because they managed to build a massive modding community, and because they are extremely good at marketing) furthers the topic in any way. We're on the Codex, discussing RPG design. And maybe, just maybe, in the context of the recent F76 blunder, we might be talking about handling marketing well. But just maybe, because the reveal of Fallout 76 was received pretty well by the general public. Nobody gives a damn here whether Todd wipes his ass with 100 dolla bills while CD Projekt has to do with 100 złoty.
tl;dr this discussion is pointless so why have it? Why even start it?