Silverfish
Liturgist
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2019
- Messages
- 3,973
I tried to press 'agree' more than once, but the codex won't let me.
Alright I can see this place is just gonna become some haven for pedos, same as every other "free speech" establishment
Heh, amateur. I don't think, full stop.
Yeah pull your kike switcheroo somewhere else, pedo
Serbian Jew double bluff. At least use the funnier accusation. Gimmie some time and I'll make up a list of ways you can do better at this.
Take some extra time and learn how to tie a decent noose insteadYeah pull your kike switcheroo somewhere else, pedo
Serbian Jew double bluff. At least use the funnier accusation. Gimmie some time and I'll make up a list of ways you can do better at this.
Strange accusation from a man who posts pictures of kids flashing their underwear on my wallAlright I can see this place is just gonna become some haven for pedos, same as every other "free speech" establishment
ok pedo
Take some extra time and learn how to tie a decent noose instead
I don’t give legal advice for free.Getting back to the thread topic, can you explain line-for-line how Twiglard is guilty of "defamation per se — specifically libel"?A game dev who has spent 17 years building fancy murder simulators, is saying pedophiles & pederasts are worse (and that Twiglard committed defamation per se — specifically libel) by starting a thread with other participants in which he stated false things about myself as matters of fact. Since I am a public figure, Twiglard may have the defense of “lacking actual malice.”
He also threatened to file a false police report which has other potential ramifications.
For now, I offered him the compromise, with consideration, to never message me privately again.
Because he isn't. His whole private message starts off by saying it may be a misunderstanding, and everything he says is conditional. "I'm worried that you're asking", "if you dox", "if this involves vigilantism".
As a big name legal guy, maybe explain to us how you'd go about suing someone for this and taking their house, car andweebsitewebsite from them? (You won't.)
The tortious act is in this text block.
Within the context of that thread, I'm worried that you're asking, among other things, for vigilante justice on Codexers who engage in cartoon
pornography. I know that many people who engage in cartoon pornography depicting children are actually child molesters and abusers. But this is insufficient
evidence for anything. If you dox codexers for cartoon pornography (no matter what it depicts, but wasn't made out of child photos), you're going to get permanently banned, if this involves vigilantism then law enforcement will most likely be
contacted against you as well. You are a game developer, which is why I'm
giving you a longer explanation with a rationale. This isn't a warning for what you've already
done, but for possible future actions. You can make this post public for transparency reasons; I'm contacting you privately for your
own benefit.
His passive aggressive phrasing does not escape tort liability for defamation per se nor per quod.
Pay a lawyer friend and ask him if being passive aggressive gets you off the hook?
On the other hand, I’m obviously not going to sue twiglard, because it would be a huge waste of my time, fuck his.
You’re taking this way more serious than anyone ITT, including myself.
I just decided to throw a metaphorical grenade, since twiglard acted like a passive aggressive moron.
I have enjoyed the thread overall though, better than the 8,000 post agitprop Ukraine thread.
In a group message, when your handle is your real name, and everyone in the message knows who you are, absolutely.I don’t give legal advice for free.Getting back to the thread topic, can you explain line-for-line how Twiglard is guilty of "defamation per se — specifically libel"?A game dev who has spent 17 years building fancy murder simulators, is saying pedophiles & pederasts are worse (and that Twiglard committed defamation per se — specifically libel) by starting a thread with other participants in which he stated false things about myself as matters of fact. Since I am a public figure, Twiglard may have the defense of “lacking actual malice.”
He also threatened to file a false police report which has other potential ramifications.
For now, I offered him the compromise, with consideration, to never message me privately again.
Because he isn't. His whole private message starts off by saying it may be a misunderstanding, and everything he says is conditional. "I'm worried that you're asking", "if you dox", "if this involves vigilantism".
As a big name legal guy, maybe explain to us how you'd go about suing someone for this and taking their house, car andweebsitewebsite from them? (You won't.)
The tortious act is in this text block.
Within the context of that thread, I'm worried that you're asking, among other things, for vigilante justice on Codexers who engage in cartoon
pornography. I know that many people who engage in cartoon pornography depicting children are actually child molesters and abusers. But this is insufficient
evidence for anything. If you dox codexers for cartoon pornography (no matter what it depicts, but wasn't made out of child photos), you're going to get permanently banned, if this involves vigilantism then law enforcement will most likely be
contacted against you as well. You are a game developer, which is why I'm
giving you a longer explanation with a rationale. This isn't a warning for what you've already
done, but for possible future actions. You can make this post public for transparency reasons; I'm contacting you privately for your
own benefit.
His passive aggressive phrasing does not escape tort liability for defamation per se nor per quod.
Pay a lawyer friend and ask him if being passive aggressive gets you off the hook?
On the other hand, I’m obviously not going to sue twiglard, because it would be a huge waste of my time, fuck his.
You’re taking this way more serious than anyone ITT, including myself.
I just decided to throw a metaphorical grenade, since twiglard acted like a passive aggressive moron.
I have enjoyed the thread overall though, better than the 8,000 post agitprop Ukraine thread.
I'm pretty confident you can't be defamed in a private message. That you then chose to post publicly on the internet, associated with your real name.
I am unaware of any boomers in this thread.So what we've learned here is that boomers unironically think anime drawings are indistinguishable from real people?
You're the one who made a publicly accessible thread containing pictures of your own private messages with a moderator about some legal issues.But I’m not actually serious about traveling to Poland and engaging in litigation with Twiglard. I was honestly surprised at how super serial autists took the dragging.
If someone threatens me with a false police report, you’re damn sure I’m going to respond.You're the one who made a publicly accessible thread containing pictures of your own private messages with a moderator about some legal issues.But I’m not actually serious about traveling to Poland and engaging in litigation with Twiglard. I was honestly surprised at how super serial autists took the dragging.
It ought to be no surprise that this, combined the tone of the messages (as well as "You threaten me with a false police report again, and I’ll own the website and your house/car" line), could understandably lead a lot of people to think you were serious about taking a legal action. The whole situation is a big WTF moment, too.
This sentence doesn't even make sense. How can someone threaten you with a "false police report"? Do you mean threaten you physically with a police report written on paper that depicts a false accusation, like rolled up into some sort of a flimsy weapon? "Watch out, Buster! I'll shove this police report of a false accusation down your throat!"If someone threatens me with a false police report, you’re damn sure I’m going to respond.
This is exactly the response I hoped you chose and you did not disappoint.What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo.
The reaction is understandable. That's not the issue. The issue (for the lack of better word) is you doing that and then being surprised that people take it seriously and saying you weren't really serious when you said what you said.If someone threatens me with a false police report, you’re damn sure I’m going to respond.
But just throwing everything into public and being mildly aggressive in written comms will do the trick 99.9999% of the time.
What apology?I accepted twiglard and the mod team’s apology.
The apology further up in the thread.The reaction is understandable. That's not the issue. The issue (for the lack of better word) is you doing that and then being surprised that people take it seriously and saying you weren't really serious when you said what you said.If someone threatens me with a false police report, you’re damn sure I’m going to respond.
But just throwing everything into public and being mildly aggressive in written comms will do the trick 99.9999% of the time.
Having said that, what would you have done had it not "do the trick"?
What apology?I accepted twiglard and the mod team’s apology.
I am pretty sure it doesn't fulfill the definition of an apology (it's more of an explanation than anything else), and that's not even touching on the other responses, which were obviously meant as jokes (of codexian quality, but jokes nevertheless).The apology further up in the thread.
Is that so? I thought MLMarkland was Mark.It's funny how Monty asked "Who's Mark?" many pages ago (or possibly not even in this thread), but now I know. @Harthwain you're the mark.
Sorry for bursting the bubble, I guess.Some people just don't like breaking kayfabe and you're not getting it.
Seems to be a theme with "lawyers" here at RPG Codex.really in love with cocaine
As a citizen?As someone who has practiced law in NY, CA, and IL for nearly 20 years
Mark Mortimer.Is that so? I thought @MLMarkland was Mark.