It is obnoxious that I AM the one being accused of elitism when it is arrogance of higher order to just come in and say that all of us veteran fps players are wrong and all those mechanics developed through the years are just arbitrary. But ME the casual who hasn't played a ranked game in their life knows whats good design. Listen to yourselves ffs.
You
are being elitist. You are an "FPS cultist". You're so attached to that label that it blinds you to everything except your favorite game. You keep saying "fps" like it's a magical word unearthed centuries ago by impenetrable sorcerers, monolithic and platonic, nullifying all other perspectives. It isn't and it doesn't.
I'm going to suggest a thought experiment. Take a deep breath and say to yourself 3 times:
Overwatch is not a first-person shooter.
Overwatch is not a first-person shooter.
Overwatch is not a first-person shooter.
It may be a first-person game, and it may contain shooting as part of its gameplay, but it is
not a "first-person shooter"
in the sense that you keep talking about. It does not obey your rules and it was never intended to. It's a new game (and if you insist it doesn't conform sufficiently to "FPS" tropes, a new
kind of game) with its own, new rules.
Now see if you can construct an argument that doesn't begin by saying "since it is an FPS (magic word!!) it has to blah blah blah".
And by the way, I'm willing to concede that the top 50 skill shot elite headshot ladder rank cultists all agree with you. I don't especially care about them, nor do I believe that their opinions reflect the needs of more casual players like myself, and I am absolutely not interested in playing a game designed by them.
Again: why do you play this game anyway? Why not COD or another "true FPS"?