InD_ImaginE
Arcane
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2015
- Messages
- 6,106
Are you seriously telling me that the recent line of DC movies is a good representation of the personalities of the characters as they were originally portrayed? You. Fucking. Millenial.One act does not make a person's alignment. That is like saying muhammed is LG because he spared Mecca as he promised if they submitted to him.Which actions, attitudes, or philosophies place him as Neutral on the Good-Evil axis?Batman is literally Neutral Good at best and Chaotic Neutral at worst.
The thought that Batman is a Paladin a.k.a Lawful is non-sense in classical D&D alignment.
Different interpretations of Batman I guess? modern Justice League DC Movies Batman which have no qualms on killing the criminal while branding the alive one with his batrang arguably is more Neutral than good.
This is the major flaw of sjws and leftards. They cherrypick one act and brand you forever with it. Take a look at what they did to Liam Neeson.
It is kind of implied in the movie that Affleck old Batman is disillusioned regarding the whole no killing and will use lethal force against his villains. In term of alignment he had shifted from Good to Neutral before the movie started. The solo Affleck Batman movie is supposed to explore that but that stuff is cancelled.
Of course the gritty batman stuff is kinda ret conned as soon as Justice League where he is much softer.
Thats why I am giving a range from best to worst you twat. If I am going to take only one representation I won't be giving that at best and at worst