I'd be down for an Eberron game in the same style.Yes, a party based isometric Ravenloft would be amazingIt should never get a sequel. A new game in the Planescape setting, from a measured hand, would be nice. I wouldn't hold my breath though. I've been waiting decades for another Ravenloft game.
Well said and I agree, you must run to become president. I would vote for youHoly shit I just realized that I never considered the possibility of a new Torment by Larian.
Imagine 3D sex with Tiefling or succubus.
The sad reality of being a Codexer - having a favorite game and wishing it never gets a sequel...
On a serious note, thats one of things I was disappointed about in PlanescapeWell said and I agree, you must run to become president. I would vote for youHoly shit I just realized that I never considered the possibility of a new Torment by Larian.
Imagine 3D sex with Tiefling or succubus.
Brethren! Let's close our ranks!
They called us scalies. They called us furries. They called us Satanists. Today we say enough!
We are facing a breakthrough today and its name is "fully your dimensional succubus sex"! Don't let bacwarded forces take what is rightfully ours! This internet is built on fetishes. What would the Founding Fathers say in the days of paranoia.com if we told them that a modern net citizen had no access to virtual sex with a female demon? Wouldn't they look at us with disappointment?
Courage, brothers!
You forgot about camo from Philosophy tube.
You obviously joking, good one
On a serious note, thats one of things I was disappointed about in PlanescapeWell said and I agree, you must run to become president. I would vote for youHoly shit I just realized that I never considered the possibility of a new Torment by Larian.
Imagine 3D sex with Tiefling or succubus.
Brethren! Let's close our ranks!
They called us scalies. They called us furries. They called us Satanists. Today we say enough!
We are facing a breakthrough today and its name is "fully your dimensional succubus sex"! Don't let bacwarded forces take what is rightfully ours! This internet is built on fetishes. What would the Founding Fathers say in the days of paranoia.com if we told them that a modern net citizen had no access to virtual sex with a female demon? Wouldn't they look at us with disappointment?
Courage, brothers!
You forgot about camo from Philosophy tube.
It had good writing and memorable and fascinating companions. But you can only develop friendship with your companions, no real physical Romance
Whats the point of having a hot and friendly succubus in your party but you cant fuck her ..and she cant kill the Nameless One anyway. The developers and writers weren't thinking logically about that one
It would most likely be using the new books for the game's setting rather than the old 2E stuff, since WotC released a set of new books last year, I only know about it because I saw DiTerlizzi made some new artwork for it that I'm not a fan of:
This art style is so common now, and it communicates a belief in nothing. You can feel the artist's atheism in the work. This piece tells me that Good and Evil are not objective truths; they are relative to the intersection of gender, race, and sexuality. Therefore, Evil actions are Good if they are committed by the right people, and Good actions are Evil if committed by the wrong people. Look at the female-to-male ratio. This is a world that has been utterly emasculated; the remaining vestiges of the male form are ugly, stunted, and dead. The DnD you grew up with is dead. Put the nails in the coffin already and bury it.It would most likely be using the new books for the game's setting rather than the old 2E stuff, since WotC released a set of new books last year, I only know about it because I saw DiTerlizzi made some new artwork for it that I'm not a fan of:
This art style is so common now, and it communicates a belief in nothing. You can feel the artist's atheism in the work. This piece tells me that Good and Evil are not objective truths; they are relative to the intersection of gender, race, and sexuality. Therefore, Evil actions are Good if they are committed by the right people, and Good actions are Evil if committed by the wrong people. Look at the female-to-male ratio. This is a world that has been utterly emasculated; the remaining vestiges of the male form are ugly, stunted, and dead. The DnD you grew up with is dead. Put the nails in the coffin already and bury it.It would most likely be using the new books for the game's setting rather than the old 2E stuff, since WotC released a set of new books last year, I only know about it because I saw DiTerlizzi made some new artwork for it that I'm not a fan of:
The style is childish and definitely worse than what Tony DiTerlizzi did... but tolerable, and the girls look like girls. It's really a lot these days.It would most likely be using the new books for the game's setting rather than the old 2E stuff, since WotC released a set of new books last year, I only know about it because I saw DiTerlizzi made some new artwork for it that I'm not a fan of:
I disagree. It does bear some resemblance, I won't deny that, but this is clearly aping a look more oriented towards modern comic books and a genre of trash more commonly known as Marvel-slop.This art style is so common now, and it communicates a belief in nothing. You can feel the artist's atheism in the work. This piece tells me that Good and Evil are not objective truths; they are relative to the intersection of gender, race, and sexuality. Therefore, Evil actions are Good if they are committed by the right people, and Good actions are Evil if committed by the wrong people. Look at the female-to-male ratio. This is a world that has been utterly emasculated; the remaining vestiges of the male form are ugly, stunted, and dead. The DnD you grew up with is dead. Put the nails in the coffin already and bury it.It would most likely be using the new books for the game's setting rather than the old 2E stuff, since WotC released a set of new books last year, I only know about it because I saw DiTerlizzi made some new artwork for it that I'm not a fan of:
huh? the artwork is pretty similar to what's inside the books for 2E, what you guys are babbling about
And that style (arguably) sucks, but the compositions are fundamentally different. The one I commented on has specific themes that it is communicating. These are themes that can't be communicated in single character portraits like the ones you posted.I disagree. It does bear some resemblance, I won't deny that, but this is clearly aping a look more oriented towards modern comic books and a genre of trash more commonly known as Marvel-slop.This art style is so common now, and it communicates a belief in nothing. You can feel the artist's atheism in the work. This piece tells me that Good and Evil are not objective truths; they are relative to the intersection of gender, race, and sexuality. Therefore, Evil actions are Good if they are committed by the right people, and Good actions are Evil if committed by the wrong people. Look at the female-to-male ratio. This is a world that has been utterly emasculated; the remaining vestiges of the male form are ugly, stunted, and dead. The DnD you grew up with is dead. Put the nails in the coffin already and bury it.It would most likely be using the new books for the game's setting rather than the old 2E stuff, since WotC released a set of new books last year, I only know about it because I saw DiTerlizzi made some new artwork for it that I'm not a fan of:
huh? the artwork is pretty similar to what's inside the books for 2E, what you guys are babbling about
Here's a few artworks from the older stuff DiTerlizzi did:
It's the current climate. You could sadly point to Disco Elysium and say "look, it could be made", but that would be the Monkey's Paw in its own right. Truth is sometimes it's better to linger in oblivion than to have your very soul rehashed to death.The sad reality of being a Codexer - having a favorite game and wishing it never gets a sequel...
Comparison to Tony DiTerlizzi's original Planescape art:
(1) Female Cat Lord on far left versus the same as depicted in the Monstrous Compendium appendix
(2) Gith on left of new art versus gith representing the Xaositect faction
(3) Human to the left of Lady of Pain in new art versus human representing the Clueless (people from the prime material plane)
(4) The Lady of Pain
(5) Modrons
