Generic-Giant-Spider
Guest
This thread is the equivalent of the hottest, most popular cheerleader girl having a long, friendly chat with the neighbourhood hobos.
Fuck you, I'm not some unwashed vagrant. You gonna finish that can of beans, btw?
This thread is the equivalent of the hottest, most popular cheerleader girl having a long, friendly chat with the neighbourhood hobos.
What the fuck man, I'm not reading all thisYou can’t assume that every owner is a crook like Feargus for the same reason that you can’t assume that every employee is a millennial snowflake. What you can assume is that people in general are susceptible to corruption if given the proper incentives. The very fact that marxists are using Avellone to push marxist propaganda attests that. That’s what you need to consider to put things in perspective and the eventual trade-offs when supporting a political decision. The empirical data of different countries will show you that unionisation creates a corrupt class of union leaders that use marxist propaganda to obtain power and creates a series of regulations that give the workers too much power and suffocate their bosses, which in turn gives incentives to people avoid being bosses or moving overseas, which in turn means less jobs, less services and a worse live for…. the workers.Agreed. The spoiled owners who can't take criticism should have that power instead.
If a series of regulations were enforced overnight Avellone’s beautiful development ideas about hierarchy would be rendered useless. Leads would be always walking on eggshells and afraid of getting sued, more and more developers would behave like leaches and not getting fired, more and more publishers would be hiring people from countries which are not unionised, thus creating unemployment. In other words, all the problems we already have in other segments when unionisation takes place will also happen in game development. I don’t want to sound cold-hearted, but when all things are considered, the eventual Feargus is a small price to pay for the business of game development. If a person doesn’t want to be susceptible to the whims of someone else, be a freelance or an indie. Unionisation will not solve the problem. It will make things worse.
So is there a licensing fee Obsidian has to pay to Dark Rock where Feargus can siphon out whatever funds he wants? Woo boy.
Rostere What's the third option?
Also, I admit I was wrong - I now clearly see why Project Indiana needs you to save them from those evil owners who are very rude and resort to screaming their balls off when they lose an argument. Clearly having you back there with your personal qualities would be a massive improvement.
Liberals in America really need to table any talks about the second or first amendment. They don't seem to grasp the idea that the Republican Party controls the entire government, and at this point any changes in free speech or gun rights laws would take the form the Republicans want them to take. Personally I don't trust a fucking Republican to housesit for the weekend, never mind determine which words are allowed to come out of my mouth.Since we've derailed anyway:I do believe that such a classification is necessary, yes, and Nazis fall into that category.
The danger of doing this is that it shifts the discussion from "using violence to suppress political beliefs is wrong" to "using violence to suppress political beliefs is wrong against certain groups".
You have an easy time defending the free speech of communists, anarcho-captialists and the like now, because of the universality of wrongness of violence to suppress politics.
You'll have a much, much harder time doing it once you have to argue for the specific exclusion from the groups it's ok to suppress.
So even if you don't believe in free speech for nazis, might I suggest you consider defending it anyway (or at least not actively undermine it), for your own sake?
It is actually very much possible. Many corporation, like Apple or Facebook does not pay taxes because they have subsidiaries who own legal rights to their IP and they "pay" (transfer money) to them for the right to use the IP.
Fargo had a plan when I talked to him when I started working on WL2 part-time at inXile... he had a five-year plan that was very clear, made a lot of sense, and clicked. In all the years at Obsidian (no shit), there wasn't a sense of where the company should go, would go, or how it would get through the next few months.
Do we have a secondary project going on being funded by a publisher like say take two? We could take those funds and finance some extra voicework for the thread. I'm not implying anything like that happened with Deadfire btw. Nope.posts should be voiced
Always find it funny when people categorize Codex when the reality is that if you ask 10 Codexers you'll get 10 different opinions/views
Always find it funny when people categorize Codex when the reality is that if you ask 10 Codexers you'll get 10 different opinions/views, people around here can't agree on anything from any facet of life except turn-based>RTWP and Avellone being awesome (and even then you have PST is a visual novel retards).
It is actually very much possible. Many corporation, like Apple or Facebook does not pay taxes because they have subsidiaries who own legal rights to their IP and they "pay" (transfer money) to them for the right to use the IP.
Ayup.
Transfer pricing is one of the beautiful tricks globalised late capitalism provides corporations so they can get out of paying taxes altogether. Ask me about it and I'll tell you how it works, it's beautiful.
Tell me, tell me!
"Won't somebody please think of the children!"It's interesting that your one entire schtick for this thread has been being mad about collateral damage to the Obsidian employees.
https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/dark-rock-industries-limited-3316531/Re: Project Indiana and Dark Rock Industries
I don't know about the copyright, but The Outer Worlds trademark that was discovered is registered to Obsidian, not to Dark Rock. It could be that Dark Rock is only for Eternity and perhaps similar future projects.
Okay.
Suppose you're running a business that imports bananas from Brazil to sell them in France. The buy price in Brazil is 10 bucks a bushel, and the sell price in France is 100 bucks a bushel. Your operating costs are 5 bucks a bushel. So you're making a cool 85 bucks profit for every bushel of bananas that you import.
Now, because you're selling them in France, you're taxed on the profits there. France, being a sensible European country, levies a 35% tax on your profits. You, being a greedy capitalist, would rather not pay those taxes. So what to do, what to do?
Here's what: you set up a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands, and another in France. The subsidiary buys the bananas at 10 bucks a bushel, and, this is the important bit, sells them to the other subsidiary in France at 99 bucks a bushel. Then the French subsidiary will sell them on at the market price, viz. 100 bucks a bushel, and since it coincidentally has operating expenses amounting to one buck a bushel, shows no profits on its books at all. No profits, no taxes. The Cayman Islands subsidiary, OTOH, shows an 84 buck-a-bushel profit, and since the corporate taxes there are a big fat zero, that's what you end up paying. All entirely legal and above-board.
A game studio could do the same by transferring the IPRs to a subsidiary in a tax haven, and then charging the main company for use of those IPRs, so that the main company shows zero profit. Again, no profit, no tax, and the owners of the tax haven subsidiary get to do whatever they like with the money that flows there.
In the meantime, roads still need to be maintained, schools staffed, fire departments run, and the taxes come off the back of the people with no such possibilities, viz. people working on a salary.
Ain't late capitalism grand?
(And NO this isn't theoretical -- this is exactly why, say, Apple funnels most of its business through a subsidiary in Ireland, which is an EU tax haven. It's not even possible to estimate just how much tax revenue is lost through these loopholes but it's in the trillions annually for the EU alone -- and explains why stuff like income and value-added tax keeps on rising. They can't run away, see.)
This has little to do with capitalism itself. it has to do with the problem that we have a global economy without global legal structure.
Also, I admit I was wrong - I now clearly see why Project Indiana needs you to save them from those evil owners who are very rude and resort to screaming their balls off when they lose an argument. Clearly having you back there with your personal qualities would be a massive improvement.
It's interesting that your one entire schtick for this thread has been being mad about collateral damage to the Obsidian employees.
No. I mean it has nothing to do *with* capitalism. If a state operating under theoretical socialism did this, it would still be a viable strategy. It is a result of a legal loophole.