m_s0
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,292
I think I now understand where Kreia came from.Google image search is getting really good
Well played, Chris Avellone.
I think I now understand where Kreia came from.Google image search is getting really good
This has little to do with capitalism itself. it has to do with the problem that we have a global economy without global legal structure.
No. I mean it has nothing to do *with* capitalism. If a state operating under theoretical socialism did this, it would still be a viable strategy. It is a result of a legal loophole.
https://www.manta.com/c/mh1zv4k/dark-rock-industries-limited
Dark Rock Industries, Limited
Dark Rock Industries, Limited is a privately held company in Irvine, CA and is a Single Location business.
Categorized under Systems Software Development Services. Current estimates show this company has an annual revenue of 57798 and employs a staff of approximately 2.
Fake page with no content
http://darkrockindustries.com
The company was created just to ensure the intellectual property of Pillars. Two people? Maybe Sawyer and Parker?
Feargus' children, surely. They were lacking a job after all.https://www.manta.com/c/mh1zv4k/dark-rock-industries-limited
Dark Rock Industries, Limited
Dark Rock Industries, Limited is a privately held company in Irvine, CA and is a Single Location business.
Categorized under Systems Software Development Services. Current estimates show this company has an annual revenue of 57798 and employs a staff of approximately 2.
Fake page with no content
http://darkrockindustries.com
The company was created just to ensure the intellectual property of Pillars. Two people? Maybe Sawyer and Parker?
Prime Junta, capitalism isn’t perfect and doesn’t have all the answers, but is the best we can get. It basically redirects peoples flaws and lower instincts into the creation of wealth and services. It certainly better than the alternative you advocate, as history abundantly shows. You should be ashamed of espousing outdated ideas as if it had any sort epistemic dignity, especially when you are so clearly ignorant about the basics of economics.Oh, you mean it's not ***real*** capitalism?This has little to do with capitalism itself. it has to do with the problem that we have a global economy without global legal structure.
Makes idle threat that he wont follow up.
Avellone mentioned that only two people had access to PoE royalties. One of them was Sawyer. So I guess is not Feargus family then.Feargus has two kids, right?
And we're just about to launch Operation Uranus.
I will show you my idle threats.Makes idle threat that he wont follow up.
I suppose you have not read Das Capital. I would not be surprised. According to its (idiotic) The capitalist mode of production does not make the profit from sales strategies. It makes it from the surplus labour extracted from the labourer.
Turn-based threats > Real-time with pause threatsI will show you my idle threats.Makes idle threat that he wont follow up.
Maybe try not sleeping and see how that helps?Jeez catching up with 15 pages after sleeping everyday is getting tiresome
Jeez catching up with 15 pages after sleeping everyday is getting tiresome
Rostere What's the third option?
Both, obviously.
I am not saying that is the case, only that it is a logical possibility given the premises in your post.
This has little to do with capitalism itself. it has to do with the problem that we have a global economy without global legal structure.
So the accumulation of capital, that leads to the legal schemes Prime Junta described is not an inherent part of capitalism? Tax evasion and the call for a laissez-faire regimen not a logical conclusion of the axioms of capitalism themselves?
Before wasting my time further. Kindly first read the related source material. Then, when you have, ponder over your own statements.
I guess you wanted to say: "financial actors within a state operating under theoretical socialism", whatever that's supposed to be. Because a state avoiding it's taxes... well, you know.
But no, it is a direct result of the axiosm of the economic system we call capitalism.
Edit. Damn you guys type fast... Well, I'll let this post stay anyway.
Not its own taxes. A state operating under such a strategy can also bypass taxes of *other* states.
Ain't no such, and anyone promising it is lying or trying to sell you on something.utopian
I'm willing to say that maybe the problem was your phrasing, not reasoning.
I'm willing to say that maybe the problem was your phrasing, not reasoning.
Naw I'm pretty sure it was the reasoning.
Interesting story about chinese corporate culture(relayed by people at my work who sometimes cooperate closely with chinese): For almost all managerial positions, they hire two people for the same job and keep them in constant competition to try and get more/better work out of them. To keep the amount of people down in important meetings, they apparantly often divide it in two, the first part everyone is present and is essentially just a presentation of the issues. Then they'll go have lunch (or something), and only invite the people who had something useful to say during the first part of the meeting, and it's during this lunch the actual decisions will get made.
I know American companies love their hierarchies, european ones tend to be way flatter. I suspect that like the chinese, it might come down to cultural differences that make the optimal configuration different in different places.
In other words Chris might need a clear and somewhat rigid hierarchy to be at his best, whereas this would be counter productive in other places.
Also, Chris Avellone Kotor2 was one of obsidian's finest hours imo.
Another obvious factor is how many people the company has.
A company with 10 employees can and should use a relatively flat structure.
A company with 1,000 employees won't be able to get away with such a structure, it'd be a complete mess to coordinate.
My experience with corporate giants is that they tend to rely on a hierarchical structure, because senior management needs to be able to hold junior management responsible, in order to accomplish large-scale tasks. It's especially necessary in mass production companies ie factories. This would explain why the Chinese corporate culture is so hierarchical - because that's the standard in that industry.
Game development these days, depending on who you ask, is closer to a factory pipe line than a small software work shop. This is strictly due to the amount of people who have to be involved to produce a premium game in 3 to 5 years development cycle. The amount of artists, writers, designers, programmers, technical quality testing, etc. that you have to coordinate is too large for there to be a flat structure. I agree with Chris, in this respect.
But for independent studios producing small games, where you have maybe a dozen people working on a project at a time, flat structures bring out more creativity. Trying to scale it up is the challenge.
Don't. Trust me on that one.Chris Avellone, have you played any of Piranha Bytes games (Gothic series, Risen series, recent Elex)?
If yes, what do you think about them?
I played a little of Gothic 3 and liked it. I want to play Elex based on discussions I've seen on this site.