And that this forum has removed some of the links
[citation needed]
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/rpg-codex-review-shroud-of-the-avatar.122699/page-9#post-5694683
It is against the codex rule to dox people by providing their real names, links to their personal stuff that has their real names, etc. He doxxed one of the people he has been feuding with and the moderators removed it. Apparently his justification for why this isn't doxxing is that it can be easily found. Which is stupid because it is still doxxing and he was still acting maliciously trying to hurt him in real life and get others to harass him in real life, not just insulting his internet reputation. Also keep in mind this wasn't even his main arch-nemesis Jamma but some other dude who simply disagreed with him about some other stuff. I guess he is such a self righteous dude that he can't contain himself to defeating his enemies online presences, he wants to harm them in real life. No doubt because of their great evil and his sense of justice cannot let evil doers, aka. people who don't recognize his victim status and status as a champion of justice, go unpunished.
But the codex rules don't care about how easily it is found. Realistically a lot of people can easily have their forum names linked to their real life through many means, often through some kind of admission in some random place on the internet but mainly Facebook. The admins want to keep real life drama off the codex, and also the admins don't like getting called by the police over some stupid forum drama, which has happened on at least one occasion before. I don't think any of the times someone was reported to the FBI has resulted in the forum admins getting contacted though.
The lack of self-awareness is hilarious! But what can you expect from the brain trust that is the failures at this forums...?
So let me see if I've got this argument correctly? Because god knows you lot couldn't manage one.
* Despite providing in the first posts the prior context and pattern of behaviour, people who don't have even the integrity to read links, let alone remember what was said in the post containing them, start ranting that the case is too long and confusing for them and they don't want to educate themselves by going back and reading anything.
* I'm then accused of being unreliable, even though no one has any idea what is even being argued, and are proud of this fact. Doubling down on the dumb doesn't make it smart, guys.
* Then, the question of prior deleted links comes up, and because you're all addicted to being stupid and prejudicial, some of you try to claim I made even that up, without bothering to check your own claims.
* Then along comes "darkpatriot" who at least admits it's true, but then has to go on a personal abusive rant to justify his own hatred whilst proving if he blew his nose, he'd lose the only IQ point he has left...
* Now watch as you all say "See how he's abusive back to us, this proves something something". Nah, I'm just treating the forum with the same respect it shows me, and everyone else. I gave you plenty of time to hang yourself on your own words. Because...
* ... If the links have been deleted... how do any of you even know if the bullshit "darkpatriot" is spouting is true?
Most of you didn't even know they were gone, so had never read them in the first place.
* Meanwhile, if what I say is actually true, and you've just hosted some of that personal abuse yourself... whilst complaining about "the police" and "the FBI" being directed towards your forums...?
Real,
real smart folks we have here, clearly.
Now let's walk you that single point referenced slowly shall we?
It's not "how easily it was found." It's his user name on MassivelyOP. And he deliberately used it to try and stitch anyone up criticising him as "doxxing" when they responded to his posts; One of the deleted links was him openly screaming about doing it. The other user name he uses on Reddit, and Eurogamer and Steam his real name: I linked you to him trying to forge
that as "doxxing" on Reddit earlier too. None of you ignorant fools bothered reading that either, or you'd have spotted the pattern; So which name is "doxxing" him, eh? Because they can't
both be. They can however both be proof of the pattern of maliciously attempting to abuse moderation.
How though, oh proud morons, do you expect anyone to prove that without pointing to the
evidence of someone using claimed "real" names to try and censor warnings about their scamming...? Or are you all equally convinced that you don't have to have any personal consistency, let alone character, and anything done to insult and be twats online is acceptable?
By the way, did "Cleve" post here under that name, or is that the name he used on Usernet? Was it his real name? Are you all "doxxing" him by obsessing about him long after he's gone, you hypocritical idiots? Of course, once the arrest is made on "jammaplaya", and if my chum turns out to be connected to it and is named too, you'll all repeat the same names here because you'll excuse it via being in the public domain. But in the short term, you'll all go "herp derp lawyers it's all bullshit" until it gets that far. Which is why I ignore the intellectual pygmies online, because some of us actually work to make the world better, instead of sitting on our asses being edgelords until we can mindlessly jump aboard a bandwagon without making any effort to get it rolling...
I especially liked the sad attempts at psychology; from someone literally a moron, desperately trying to prove your weird need to hate and projecting your need to imagine people as a comic book villain, well it bothers me... not much. I mean, if I really wanted to "harm" him as you so stupidly assume, I'd have done what their community does, and sent around the real life locations. I mean, you all at least bothered checking that, right? That this has happened, and it wasn't even me saying it had happened to him....?
Of course you didn't.
"but some other dude who simply disagreed with him about some other stuff"
Once more, being proud of being too lazy or nasty to bother educating yourself isn't a good thing, mate. He's done rather more than that, especially when you know he's also been using multiple accounts and what he tried to do under that too; The "Lying for Shroud" link alone shows that he accidentally admitted to stealing one of his tenants RMT possessions. But then the people of this forum clearly think toxic abusiveness is normal. So it's no wonder many of you can't see why it's so bad to do that, birds of a feather and all that...
Am a paragon of justice? Compared to you stunted moral jellyfish, by fuck I am! And I'm proud of that; Some of us aspire to better than "I can be a dick online, normalise dickery, woo hoo duh!" And it's equally hilarious watching my admirers over at Raw, even as "deadlyhabit" and more and more people point out they realise how right I was, continuing to double down on the stupidity and just reinforces that superiority to them again and again and again... And I honestly pity you that you're all so damn weak and talentless that instead of improving yourselves even on something a simple as basic empathy, you have to go on these weird flights of imaginative hatred because you don't know how to do anything good with
yourselves.
But it ALL keeps people away from Shroud of the Avatar, which anyone who hasn't normalised harassment and toxicity will be grateful for the warning about. So as always, thank you now RPG Codex for ensuring that even on a negative review, anyone thinking of risking the game all the same will take one look at the hate filled idiots that surround it and say "No chance I'm taking that risk." You see, obsessively focusing on me, instead of bothering to try and work out the truth, just proves what a shit filled cess pool MMO communities, and now RPG Codex
in particular is. And Shroud is one of the worst. Whilst I just abandon the account, and move on with my wonderful life and forget all about you pygmies.