BritishAccentsGetTheGirls You may want to consider using
archive.is for pertinent websites rather than rely on the Wayback Machine.
I notice you've put up a thread on Reddit now. One thing you need to understand is that Raw and everything else has only ever been a tool for getting vital information out about Shroud to innocent people who might suffer if they make the mistake of getting involved with it. That doesn't mean all the people on the critical side are likeable, or hell could even tie their own shoelaces. Just tools to get the information out there.
Oh titler, don't ever change.
I'm glad people here realized quickly what type of person you are and how quick you are to attack anyone who doesn't jump on the bandwagon.
Just in case anyone is actually interested, I HIGHLY encourage you to actually click on titler's links that he provides as his "evidence" against me. What he says happened, vs what is actually shown in the links is never the same, he counts on the fact that most people won't follow the links, most people will just see that there is a link and assume he has something to back up his accusations. Spoiler, he doesn't.
I'd like to provide some corrections from the rant about me here. Because titler is too much of a coward to actually engage me anymore and prefers to talk about me in places like here where he thinks I won't come and answer him. He did this on reddit too before he was site-wide banned, where he would accuse me of things in his comments in other subs that i don't read and not tag me, hoping i wouldn't see it and come to dispute his lies. He does this because every time he has actually argued with me it devolves into the usual flinging of insults because I disagree with him rather than any actual basis to his claims against me.
Anyways, here we go:
1. I was a couple thousand invested into Shroud, have since recouped most of my money. My brother is not monetarily invested at all. . This is nothing that we have denied and i've stated it in numerous places. Both of us have been critical of the game for years now, (myself since all the way back to release 7 or 8 when the combat system was introduced) we are not "very very late" to anything.
2. "They're also proud of their own claimed disabilities, calling each other "window lickers" et all."
This happened exactly once as a joke and here is the comment
https://www.reddit.com/r/shroudoftheavatar/comments/7m4nvw/goin_huntin/drscbhy/ as usual titler likes to take small events and exaggerate them for some reason.
3. "And they're both of the mindset that nothing online is real. That any kind of trolling is fine because it's just words. His brother even once tried to claim that Xbox chat was reality, and that inability to deal with the kind of trash talk there proved you couldn't deal with reality"
My brother has used xbox live as a known toxic community as an example of how people troll all the time. He told titler that if a 10 year old on xbox live could easily block someone who was harassing him online, then titler should also learn to block and ignore people on reddit or forums or wherever. No idea where titler gets the idea that nothing online is real, and as usual he has no evidence to show for that claim. He takes a comparison of trash talking on xbox live and exaggerates that to say we think that it is reality, or that nothing online is real?
4. "The idea that not everyone is that disconnected and hollow,
and that despite endless hints I'm protecting a third party who the rape threats are being directed towards, has never sunk into either of them. They completely lack empathy, and assume everything's as bollocks as they act online. They just keep on looking for excuses to justify their ever evolving excuses for hatred. You'll notice in the reply to your post, AdamZax says "We will see if anything comes of his police reports, we've certainly been hearing about them for awhile now".... for months though
he denied they were even real."
Again this is just an outright lie and he will not be able to show any evidence of it. I have lost any empathy for him due entirely to his attitude towards myself and to other people. As you can see even on these forums he goes on the attack immediately on being questioned about anything. I have told him this, and told him that it is his attitude that makes people not care about his problems anymore.
What I did not do is deny that he made any police reports or is taking legal action. Neither did my brother, in fact what my brother did do was comment about how these police reports are a waste of time and that he hopes the police have something better to do than investigate someone being mean on the internet. Again, he has been challenged to show any proof of me denying that the police reports exist, and he still fails to produce it. He says I did it, and if you don't believe him you are a fool. That is the extent of his evidence.
If anyone bothers to look through the post history with titler and I they will see that I tell him many times that I don't hate him, that I don't even think about him except when I see him making claims against me and have to respond. He can't seem to understand that and is convinced that i'm on some crusade of hatred against him. I have assured him that all I feel is sorry for him and his obvious delusion, but he won't accept that.
5. "Where does it come from? At first it was some weird need to lash out at me because I mentioned Portalarium's funding model was based upon exploiting vulnerable and poor people;
that the industry knows damn well gambling mechanisms in particular target those least able to cope with it. Because deep down I suspect they both knew they'd fallen prey to it as well. But as reality slowly set in about how the game was actually developing, and they moved over to critical, the pathetic need to justify personal hate shifted."
Here is the "lashing out at him" about Port's RMT.
https://imgur.com/a/OXww9JC
I had tried correcting him on a post he made where he said that no property could come into the game without RMT. I agreed with most of his post except I corrected him on that part because at the time there was a lottery in game that you could spend in game gold on for tickets, and win property. I pointed out that this system was purely in game and did not rely on RMT. That was it, I simply tried to correct a factually incorrect statement that he made and I got attacked by him because of it. He can't even admit he made a small mistake, and you can see in the PM's how quickly he starts ranting and insulting me just for trying to correct something he said. This was my first clash with him and so the idea that I was lashing out at him to justify some personal hate is just laughable.
6. "It really took off when he was trying to claim that I'd said his brother was behind the "craftymethod" identity, because of his own basic illiteracy, and then refused to accept my pointing out the word "thread" has multiple meanings in English and I'd been saying for months I knew who it really belonged too (my stalker again).
Even though you could search my own comment history and see that out of 7 times I'd mentioned his brother, 6 times were specifically saying he wasn't my stalker. And then he took to sending me pathetic PMs where he literally had to edit out entire clauses in my own posts, to try and make it look like I was saying the opposite of what I did, and then saying it proved that I didn't know what my own opinion was."
It really took off here indeed. This is where everyone could see that titler can not even admit to the smallest of mistakes. He accused my brother (mrblight) of being an alt of another user named Craftymethod.
His original comment making that claim is here
https://www.reddit.com/r/shroudofth...munity_reacts_to_civil_discussion_on/dl1mwiz/
When I assured him (politely at first as you can see there) that blight was not an alt of craftymethod, rather than simply move on with having made a mistake, he doubles down and claimed that i'm simply too stupid to understand how he was using the word thread, and he didnt mean a forum thread but the overall thread of a theme about the forums. Yes this is actually what he is claiming rather than admitting a mistake. Despite that his original comment uses the word thread 3 times, the first 2 of which are clearly meaning forum threads, and the 3rd time linking to a forum thread that my brother posted.... but sure... he didn't REALLY mean forum thread in that sense, he meant that there was an overall thread or theme happening... even though that makes absolutely no sense with the context of his post.
This little mistake of his continues to irk him, apparently, because he brings it up even still, and has even more absurd defenses for it. Such as telling us to look how many time's he's mentioned my brothers name and jamma at the same time.... which doesnt make any sense because i'd never claimed he accused my brother of being jamma, I claimed he accused him of being craftymethod, which you can see right there in the original comment.
I've had a number of conversations with him about this since then and gotten PM's from him about it and he still refuses to admit that he simply got my brother mistaken with another user. On reddit, his big evidence of it was to link to that original comment I just linked to, even though it shows exactly what i'm talking about and no reasonable person reads it in the way he is trying to say he used it.
7. "So I'd get PMd images such as this one,
where by cutting out the line where I acknowledge items can be traded more than once, he tried to argue to me that my own argument was that no trade
ever happens with out RMT. Obviously it does, but the idea of initial bias was beyond him. Or this one where he tried to argue that
by selectively quoting the line that says RMT is Essential, it meant I couldn't believe you could get a home by any other method, even though the previous line listed grinding specifically. And then he'd rant on obviously I didn't know what I was saying because I didn't agree with him."
This is just a repeat of point #5 and is covered there, where that screenshot shows the whole conversation and the full screenshots I used to correct him. Again, he is so hung up on being better than everyone that he can't even admit simple mistakes. Also note his lack of reading comprehension, where he says that I tried to claim his argument was that no trades ever happen without RMT. Obviously, as anyone can see in the full conversation i linked above, I never once said that. I pointed out to him where he claimed that no property could come into the game without RMT, and that it was objectively false.
8. "What a cock, eh? Over time, he just got less and less rational or even decent with regards to me.
Which is why when the threads went up which were very obviously an attempt to talk about SWATing, he was so happy to engage in them with relish.
Notice that in comments my stalker specifically does the "I'm not saying I'll do this, but I've thought about it" claim and talks directly about sending the SWAT police around to someone. Now someone that unhinged, to be talking like that over Christmas? Someone you know has threatened people's children? Someone that, even if you don't want to admit it, you are vaguely aware "Titler" isn't lying about someone getting into his email...
Does a moral person
encourage someone like that? Even if you hate me personally, knowing the threats are being directed at an innocent third party when sent my way...? Do you do it?"
This is always a fun one. titler is obsessed with trying to smear me as having encouraged swatting. However he fails, and has always failed, at explaining how I did it. His evidence is always that I posted where I live, and then around the same time a swatting event happened in real life. The thread that he links to has a deleted post by beastroll. Beastroll is the one who replied to me and said he was tempted to take my address and swat me. I didn't reply to him, no one else replied to him, that was the single mention of swatting and apparently just being in the conversation before that comment was made means that I encouraged swatting.
I suppose that by simply being in this forum where we are mentioning swatting, that titler and everyone else here is also now guilty of encouraging swatting, eh? It is lunacy.
It's a smear that he has obsessed about since christmas, posting all over the place on reddit and other forums, and naming me without tagging me, hoping that I would not notice while he attempted to link me to a criminal activity just because someone commented to me that they were tempted to swat me. Classy titler, classy.
He seems to be either very jelous or very offended that I posted where I live publically, as if that is somehow a crime in itself, and he consistently uses the fact that i posted where i live as one of his main points of evidence that i encourage swatting. He has called me a despicable person and all kinds of names for posting where I live. For some reason he gets to decide what I do with my own personal information I guess? He also consistently tries to link the fact that I posted where I live and that a real swatting event happened around the same time. I removed my info when that event happened because I thought it might be in bad taste to have it up there. He claims that I tried to hide the fact i'd done it, and claims that i deny ever posting it. Not once have I ever denied posting it, and he will as usual not be able to provide a single shred of evidence of me doing so.
My info is mine to use as i see fit, and I am not particularly worried about people knowing where I live, it's easy info to find out online anyways. This offends titler for some reason, and so he is still trying to smear me with the swatting thing, no matter how laughable his claims are.
9. "
But here he is trying to turn it around and claiming pointing out he'd done, it is trying to swat him. How am I, if posting your address is innocent, you idiot?"
More reading comprehension fail from titler. Apparently just by acknowledging a post from someone else pointing out that titler is talking about me, I am somehow accusing titler of trying to swat me. I don't know why titler is so obsessed with swatting, but i'll save you the trouble of clicking the link, here are my exact words copied from that post: "Interesting catch, thanks for pointing that out. Since he tried to hide it by not doing a proper tag for my username, I wouldn't have otherwise noticed it."
That's it. But to titler, that is me trying to turn it around and claiming he is trying to swat me. Riiight...
10. "I don't think encouraging sociopaths to escalate against
anyone is right. Oh and RES only shows you've edited it,
not what the prior edits were. I do actually know what the address he posted was. I didn't link to where he repeats it, which is why I checked RES couldn't recover it, because
I'm not a moral cripple."
The address I listed before is no longer my current one, however I'm happy to let anyone know where I live. I'm in Manitoba, Canada, in a town called Beausejour, on Road 69.
It's incredibly easy to find this online and I really dont care if people know where I live.
Again, this is something i've said many times and title just cant seem to wrap his head around it. He cant seem to understand that me using my own information is up to me, and not up to him. According to him though using my own information makes me a moral cripple lol.
Well there it is titler, i'm using my own information again in any way that I want, sorry (not sorry) that offends you so much.
11. "It makes it all the more hilarious that because I dropped a deliberate hint I would think it stupid to give the moderator role to AdamZax... they gave the moderator role to AdamZax! He now has to clean that crap up every day, and I chuckle knowing he has too every day too. Still can't bring himself to show any humanity though, even as he gets it in the neck too!"
titler is so self absorbed he cant imagine any other reason that I might have been made a moderator of the Shroud subreddit except that it must have been done to personally insult him! There can be no other explanation! Nevermind the fact that I had offered a couple times before titler ever made a comment on it, or that I might actually be decent at doing it. Nope, it was purely to spite him personally!
Sorry for the wall of text, but as I said above titler is too much of a coward to provide any evidence of his claims against me and prefers to lie about me in places he thinks i wont see.
Hopefully the drama at least entertains a few people.
I think it's important to see different perspectives when you get claims and ranting like he provides, so that everyone can actually evaluate a little more fairly. Anyone is welcome to message me on reddit about anything, I'm not sure if i will check back here as its not a site i normally visit. username is AdamZax
Now, final note: Nothing I say here about titler in any way belittles what jamma did or does. Jamma is a sick individual and has harassed a number of people through PM's on the official forums and reddit and other forums. He has been caught impersonating and trolling people multiple times and is protected by Portaliarium for some reason, which is a REAL problem. I've been one of the people he tries to harass, although I am much harder to intimidate, or get under the skin of, than someone like titler seems to be.
I find most of his harassment towards me personally to be simply amusing.
I find claims that he has threatened other peoples children to be disturbing and obviously crosses a line. I have never once belittled those claims. I think that titler probably has been harassed by jamma and have never denied that or said otherwise (even though titler keeps saying i do). Jamma is toxic and Port should be ashamed of themselves for protecting him.
However, that being said, just take everything titler says with a grain of salt, because in my mind, he is just as toxic, and in fact i've seen much more abuse, harassment, insults, and bullying from titler than i ever have seen publicly from jamma. The reason it seems like people lack empathy for titler and his problems is purely because of titler himself and his attitude towards people, and his tendency to automatically attack and insult anyone that questions him or doesnt stroke his ego strongly enough.
Adam out.