I never asked you for a wall of text
I can't say what a standard AP is, as I don't know what your arbitrary idea of 'standard AP' is.
^ that's you asking for an adequate definition before you're willing to discuss, and such a definition cannot be provided without the amount of text I just gave you. Don't ask me to define something and then complain when I do!
for now I just want to be sure what you're trying to argue:

I'm being pretty clear in aforementioned wall of text homie. I'm saying: of course you can group "classes" of champions together based on their similarities (otherwise you're arguing that you can't compare the similarities of champions, and I'm sure that's not what you're doing... right?). Grouping standard AP carries is just like grouping "global ult" champions or "energy" champions; you just make a group of traits and call them something:
You take a group of champions who share these characteristics: ranged, high burst, hard cc, AoE damage, at home in mid lane and who have a big nuke ult. To be a standard AP Carry, you have too have all but one of those. You can group these guys together and call them whatever (I call them standard AP Carries here) and look at how many of this type have been released lately and what their fates have been. And then you notice some common traits:
1) Few releases compared to earlier days
2) Both old and new releases of this kind of champion are mostly unplayed and considered not viable or sub-par, or played in other roles
3) Have not received patching under the same circumstances as other types of champions
Can RIOT do whatever? Sure.
Is my satire earlier in this thread, A Guide to Mage Design, true? Hell yes.
The only thing I've been saying since the start is: I like standard AP carries, RIOT doesn't right now. You challenged the last bit. So I've heard your opinion. I'm waiting to hear your argument.
Also, get online. I have the day off tomorrow. GAMINGZ TIEM