Heroic Liberator
Arcane
For multiplayer? No. Base game already has that.
For the online matchmaking.For multiplayer? No. Base game already has that.
Will the SpellForce 3 base game and its expansions ever be in the same client?
– That's our goal once we fully reworked the main game campaign.
and SH
and SH
Nigga the expansion didn't have problems on release,at least in the single. The patches must be about multi balance and such.
Did anyone finish it? I just returned from a nice vocation(if walking 30 kilometres a day that) and a reading my self to ravage some dark elfs.
I'm about halfway, but ran into some bugs (sidequests), so I'm waiting on patches.
I finished the game with only two unfinished side quests because of a map bug. It is pretty good actual expansion,the whole campaign must be long as the original. Mechanically i liked the old skill three and ui better,the strategy have some improvement but it is still too easy and the AI is pretty bad. I don't get why people say it is hard,haven't seen a single mission that was challenging. The writing is still the best thing about the game but it does have its sjw garbage. It doesn't let you have an opinion on what is good and evil and just proclaims it,the whole dwarfen quest line leaves bad taste in your mouth. The companions are well written and interesting,also it have an option to go full party creation.
Mate, the troll protagonist shtick was advertised from the get-go.LoL and then i just watched the trailer and decided to not even bother pirating it. Not interesting playing as retarded trolls lol. Good luck anyway,hope there is another DLC.
The atavistic legacy of Spellforce 2's later expansions I'd wager.I question why they are making these expansions standalone, in effect creating artificial problems like in that table. Would anyone play/buy Fallen God without playing the other ones?
Who gives a fuck about MP on this one?The FULL PVP one is even more puzzling to me.
Also SF3 is like the last proper fantasy RTS available on the market nowadays with nice crispy looking graphics and pretty good writing. Not too shabby.Ugh, it was never mediocre (except maybe 2). It's as boring as you make it.
Cute as always.
Or is this some kind of free-to-play standalone for online play only?
Similar to SC2?
I could at least understand the idea behind that, even if I don't think the game was successful enough to warrant such a thing?
It's base building vs base building like every other RTS ever. Or you are asking what PvP-only means? It means you don't have access to the singleplayer campaign, only online matches against other people.What does PvP even mean in the context of this game?
It is free to play, I guess they want to enlarge their player base. Considering WC3 remake went bust and SC2 further development is dead maybe they want to become a premier RTS MP game.The FULL PVP one is even more puzzling to me.
As long as that wouldn't mean that they'd neglect the series' RPG elements in subsequent releases, I wish them the best.It is free to play, I guess they want to enlarge their player base. Considering WC3 remake went bust and SC2 further development is dead maybe they want to become a premier RTS MP game.The FULL PVP one is even more puzzling to me.