https://exputer.com/news/games/starfield-200-million-budget-500-devs/
All estimates though. Considering how half-assed the game is, the randomly generated content, and the high likelihood that a lot of the 500-member team was probably located in countries like India, it could be only 150 million for all I know.
They won't move on. Bugthesda addicts will probably play this for the rest of their lives, just like every other Bugthesda game.
"FUCKING PRONOUUUUUUUUNS!!!!!"
I actually do remember, SDG. Beyond No Man's Sky not having ESG writing and being completely free from niggers it was a much better space game than Niggerfield on release. What people got upset about was that they didn't have time to implement multiplayer before the deadline from Sony hit and that some content had to be cut, like the sandworms from Dune. In some ways the release version is better than the fixed version, because the minecraft basebuilding loop that Todd crammed into his game from the beginning doesn't mesh with exploration where you are supposed to go from system to system and land on new worlds, not dick around in a cookie clicker base somewhere.
I don't think Niggerfield has the technological or systemic depth to make it a good framework for that. If someone added a mech or another vehicle with a mod for example players would just run into the invisible walls faster while finding nothing of interest. You can de-niggerfy the game, rewrite the entire plot like one of those German total conversion mods for the TES games, and it still wouldn't be a good game or an RPG. It's forever stuck as a mediocre shooter and loading screen simulator.
Based, BGS continues to be the only ones who still push racism into their games.
Incline.
Clearly, No Man's Sky faced a lot of criticism upon release, but they continued to work on it, and the planet exploration it offers is far superior to anything Starfield provides. In No Man's Sky, you can fully explore planets, even terraform them a bit to establish your bases. There's a tremendous variety and some truly alien landscapes to discover. Plus, there are legitimate reasons to build outposts. On the other hand, Starfield's planet exploration feels bland by comparison. You can't interact much inside the many small, instanced portions of planets, and there's absolutely no incentive to construct outposts; it's just a tedious task. Empyrion is doing a much better job in this regard as well.I actually do remember, SDG. Beyond No Man's Sky not having ESG writing and being completely free from niggers it was a much better space game than Niggerfield on release. What people got upset about was that they didn't have time to implement multiplayer before the deadline from Sony hit and that some content had to be cut, like the sandworms from Dune. In some ways the release version is better than the fixed version, because the minecraft basebuilding loop that Todd crammed into his game from the beginning doesn't mesh with exploration where you are supposed to go from system to system and land on new worlds, not dick around in a cookie clicker base somewhere.
The planets were also made less interesting in later NMS builds because people complained that some of them looked crappy, which is true, but that swung in both directions and normalizing them to make them all prettier removed some of the more interesting ones. Release version of NMS looked like a, while the updated version looks more like in the official concept art I guess. All the most impressive features were in the game and functional and all in all it had less bugs than any Bethesda game, the only thing it lacked was the Minecraft resource grind that is in every game these days and the multiplayer. Some features they added like player owned capital ships and space stations were neat but not necessary nor advertised in the marketing.
It's impressive how an indie team (they only had a publishing deal with Sony) could put together something much more impressive and robust than a Microsoft owned studio could with an infinite budget and a massive delay.
That sounds too complicated. He should instead upgrade his PC.
doing quests now, and I have to say it's good, like, really good, for a Bethesda game. I can absolutely see how people will say it's boring. You either like it or you don't, but this game is just my jam.
There are more UI mods, I think undelayed menus is a must, but I'm not modding yet.Ironically, the inventory is the LEAST shitty part of the UI
Man, who does anymore? Todd stopped giving a shit years ago, once he realised modders will develop his PC UI for free, but what about the rest of the industry? CBP's is a low-effort clownshow, BG3's is actively infuriating. I guess smaller PC exclusives still sort of manage, like PFKM, but the last major AAA crossplatform title I played with a great PC UI was DX4. Forget graphics, interfaces are your window into the gameplay, it drives me up a wall.
