Tactics Ogre: Reborn - remaster based on 2010 release

[Dhaze]

Oh yeah, I wholeheartedly second Fae Tactics.

 

[ChavaiotH]

I bought it and I'm playing it. Very good game, a real treat compared to today's faggot garbage.
The Japanese know how to make games, but the West has descended into depressing shit with faggots and LGBT bullshit. I don't give a shit about the graphics, they look good to me. Pixels are fucking annoying. Every stupid lazy asshole who thinks he knows how to make a game makes pixels. But in those days resources were limited, that's why they made pixels.
That's why it's a good remake.

 

[Endemic]

I figured this would do well - particularly on PC - but I didn't think it'd be doing this well. Holy man, ~10,000 concurrent players on Steam right now. That blows pretty much all of their recent releases out of the water. People who thought I was being too optimistic about this game possibly giving Matsuno a chance at directing a larger game may want to take a look at these numbers and think again.

Tactics Ogre/FFT are still well known and were responsible for setting a lot of trends in the SRPG genre, so I'm not surprised.

 

[DJOGamer PT]

I don't see the point of remaking this game a second time.

1. The 1st Remake was released for the PSP, not the PC
2. A lot of people complained about the mechanical changes made in it
3. IP's loose their - trademark, copyrights, other legal shenanigans - if they aren't used after X years
4. Squenix may be potentially testing the waters for further Ogre Battle products - be it more remasters or even potential sequels

 

[Grunker]

Is there a handy place or wiki with precise descriptions of all the terms? Such as what "BREACHED" does etc.

 

[Turn_BASED]

I found a pretty major bug, union level is 17, and Xapan just joined me at level 50, lol.

The fruit of following the lawful path! Do not doubt this gift from god.

 

[Turn_BASED]

Is there a handy place or wiki with precise descriptions of all the terms? Such as what "BREACHED" does etc.

That’s the Tactics Ogre version of BLACKED, it also reduces physical defense. Good for that first tough necromancer fight.

You can find all status effects here https://tacticsogre.fandom.com/wiki/Status_Effects

 

[ChavaiotH]

Is there a handy place or wiki with precise descriptions of all the terms? Such as what "BREACHED" does etc.

That’s the Tactics Ogre version of BLACKED, it also reduces physical defense. Good for that first tough necromancer fight.

You can find all status effects here https://tacticsogre.fandom.com/wiki/Status_Effects

The fight with the necromancer took place 2 times.
The first time I got fucked up. Had to go back to training camp.
Second time I beat him.

 

[Grunker]

Is there a handy place or wiki with precise descriptions of all the terms? Such as what "BREACHED" does etc.

That’s the Tactics Ogre version of BLACKED, it also reduces physical defense. Good for that first tough necromancer fight.

You can find all status effects here https://tacticsogre.fandom.com/wiki/Status_Effects

My level up screen keeps saying I learned finishing moves, but I can't equip them. What am I missing?

Also, how long do buffs from items last - Fortify from Basin of Time for instance.

 

[luj1]

I figured this would do well - particularly on PC - but I didn't think it'd be doing this well. Holy man, ~10,000 concurrent players on Steam right now. That blows pretty much all of their recent releases out of the water. People who thought I was being too optimistic about this game possibly giving Matsuno a chance at directing a larger game may want to take a look at these numbers and think again.

Tactics Ogre/FFT are still well known and were responsible for setting a lot of trends in the SRPG genre, so I'm not surprised.

I ought to try these some day, as they are apparently regarded as the pinnacle of tactical JRPGs.

 

[GhostCow]

Tactics Ogre/FFT are still well known and were responsible for setting a lot of trends in the SRPG genre, so I'm not surprised.

I ought to try these some day, as they are apparently regarded as the pinnacle of tactical JRPGs.

Great games, but Troubleshooter: Abandoned Children blows them out of the water.

 

[Turn_BASED]

Is there a handy place or wiki with precise descriptions of all the terms? Such as what "BREACHED" does etc.

That’s the Tactics Ogre version of BLACKED, it also reduces physical defense. Good for that first tough necromancer fight.

You can find all status effects here https://tacticsogre.fandom.com/wiki/Status_Effects

My level up screen keeps saying I learned finishing moves, but I can't equip them. What am I missing?

Also, how long do buffs from items last - Fortify from Basin of Time for instance.

That screen says Skills/Finishing Moves I think, which shows you both skills and finishing moves that you unlocked. You probably just unlocked skills.

Basin of time is an item you can steal, right? If so it only lasts for the battle you use it in.

 

[notpl]

Tactics Ogre/FFT are still well known and were responsible for setting a lot of trends in the SRPG genre, so I'm not surprised.

I ought to try these some day, as they are apparently regarded as the pinnacle of tactical JRPGs.

Great games, but Troubleshooter: Abandoned Children blows them out of the water.

All character building, zero actual tactics. Totally different games.

 

[S.torch]

I don't give a shit about the graphics, they look good to me. Pixels are fucking annoying. Every stupid lazy asshole who thinks he knows how to make a game makes pixels. But in those days resources were limited, that's why they made pixels.
That's why it's a good remake.

Pixel-Art was an art style developed, in the beginning of the genre, because limitations, and then with the pass of time it became his own art style. You know, like many other artistic styles, movements and methods have developed in history. A good example of this was acquarella, used by many artist than didn't have oil. Eventually acquarella became a good material on his own because many artist just like how it looked.

Pixel-Art is quite the contrary to being lazy, because it has specific rules that you most follow sometimes so it can look good, you need to keep resolution, your colour palette and often need to convey a lot of information in reduced space. Instead, a good example of laziness is exactly what you're praising here, that is, that they literally put a filter above the game backgrounds and sprites and called it a day.

And this is not a remake, this a remaster. The remake is the PSP version, that's the version they're remastering.

Retard.

 

[ChavaiotH]

I don't give a shit about the graphics, they look good to me. Pixels are fucking annoying. Every stupid lazy asshole who thinks he knows how to make a game makes pixels. But in those days resources were limited, that's why they made pixels.
That's why it's a good remake.

Pixel-Art was an art style developed, in the beginning of the genre, because limitations, and then with the pass of time it became his own art style. You know, like many other artistic styles, movements and methods have developed in history. A good example of this was acquarella, used by many artist than didn't have oil. Eventually acquarella became a good material on his own because many artist just like how it looked.

Pixel-Art is quite the contrary to being lazy, because it has specific rules that you most follow sometimes so it can look good, you need to keep resolution, your colour palette and often need to convey a lot of information in reduced space. Instead, a good example of laziness is exactly what you're praising here, that is, that they literally put a filter above the game backgrounds and sprites and called it a day.

And this is not a remake, this a remaster. The remake is the PSP version, that's the version they're remastering.

Retard.

I haven't read it. I am not interested in your opinion. Dung beetle.

 

[Grunker]

a jrpg that understands the concept of brevity

is this real life

 

[Modron]

No it's just a remake of a game once constrained by cart limits before the japanese could really begin to wax poetic in a repetitious manner.

 

[Grunker]

No it's just a remake of a game once constrained by cart limits before the japanese could really begin to wax poetic in a repetitious manner.

blessed be

 

[thesecret1]

So which one should I play? This one, or the 2010 one?

 

[Monkeyfinger]

I figured this would do well - particularly on PC - but I didn't think it'd be doing this well. Holy man, ~10,000 concurrent players on Steam right now. That blows pretty much all of their recent releases out of the water. People who thought I was being too optimistic about this game possibly giving Matsuno a chance at directing a larger game may want to take a look at these numbers and think again.

Anyone who knows the name Matsuno, knows he's way past his prime.

 

[Jinn]

Anyone who knows the name Matsuno, knows he's way past his prime.

Yeah, well, so is Kawazu technically. Yet we still got an amazing game like SaGa: Scarlet Grace. Things are never so cut and dry, particularly when it comes to those who create and the teams that work with them. A lot of it can come right down to the resources they have to work with.

 

[Great Deceiver]

I can't play with these butchered sprites. It's so bad. Would be cool if someone retconned the modern translation into the old SNES rom.

 

[Dhaze]

Pixel-Art is quite the contrary to being lazy, because it has specific rules that you most follow sometimes so it can look good, you need to keep resolution, your colour palette and often need to convey a lot of information in reduced space. Instead, a good example of laziness is exactly what you're praising here, that is, that they literally put a filter above the game backgrounds and sprites and called it a day.

Yup. I'll always be astounded by people who think pixel art is lazy; how can one look at contemporary takes on the genres like Hyper Light Drifter or Kynseed and think 'lazy' is utterly beyond me. And not only is pixel art difficult to do properly, it's also—as you pointed out—remarkably easy to butcher.

 

[Nutmeg]

Obligatory:

Imbalanced, repetitive, grind heavy sandbox RPG w/ poor UI and slow combat​

Tactics Ogre: Let Us Cling Together for PSP is a remake of the original Tactics Ogre released in late 1995 on the Super Famicom. Tactics Ogre is not the "inventor", "innovator", or "the grandfather of" the tactics genre. Series such as Front Mission, Fire Emblem, Super Robot Wars, Langrisser, Daisenryaku, X-COM, Shining Force, Nectaris, Jagged Alliance, Panzer General, Famicom Wars, and well over 200 other turn based tactical level video games were released earlier than Tactics Ogre, and did just about everything TO did first. Nothing important about Tactics Ogre's game play was particularly new or innovative in 1995, let alone in 2011.

So how well does this remake stand up to the sleek, efficient, and well designed modern tactics games of today? Not very well. Tactics Ogre fails in its combat pacing, tactical variety and content, strategically meaningful depth, user interface, and difficulty.

Tactics Ogre is lacking in content variety. Almost every mission is completed by killing the enemy leader with a few token trash mobs strewn about. Almost every map is a hill gradually rolling from bottom to top. There are almost no scripted events or interesting things going on to speak of.

Almost all of the games depth - its physical attack and element types, skills, stats, statuses, spells, races, tarot signs, terrain, height, directional facing, finishing moves, battlefield conditions, and etc. can be soundly ignored in favor of a few simple strategies that are repeated ad nauseum. Tactics Ogres depth is strategically meaningless in the face of easy, simple, overpowered strategies. It doesn't get any more difficult or complex further into the campaign, either. As a result most fights are boring, easy, and repetitive.

Due to the poor level design and variety, I don't think TO challenge runs are particularly appealing. Not to mention you'll need to restrict yourself from using almost everything available, and the game will still be pretty easy regardless. Just like there are better tactics games to play, there are better tactics games to do challenge runs on.

Much of TOs depth is needlessly convoluted and confusing, on top of being mostly useless in favor of archers, TP, damage boosting skills, etc. Learning and casting spells is a convoluted process involving scrolls, skills, and "arcanas". Making one skill per enemy race and status effect only serves to pad out skill lists with useless chaff.

The insistence on obscurely naming every spell some sort of pseudo-latin gibberish is particularly ridiculous. It feels like an attempt to browbeat and befuddle the player with similarly strategically meaningless options that have little applicable effect on the game. Many times the shop and crafting list will flood with items and gear for classes you can't even use yet.

It's telling that mid way through the game the developers give up and hand you spells that cure all buffs/debuffs instead of creating an individual spell for each effect. The "Tactics Ogre is so deep!" emperor has no clothes.

The AI is incompetent, coded to run forward recklessly and hit the target that they'll do the most damage to. Even worse, the game constantly saddles you with uncontrollable, badly behaved AI allies. Your guest allies will ignore your own breakable crowd control such as sleep and won't exorcise undead.

When trying to save potential NPC recruits units that prefer to run away from you and not heal themselves, it's completely random as to whether they'll survive long enough for you to rescue them. Not that recruits are particularly valuable since they'll almost always have a worse skill set than what you can build onto the troops you begin the game with.

The developers require the player to grind to experience most of the games famed "depth". Classes all level up at once, but you can't level a class if it isn't used during a mission, and new classes start at level 1. Since level 1 classes tend to be very weak beyond chapter 1 you'll have to cripple your team or start grinding if you wish to bring a new class up to speed. This means any new class you get past chapter 2 is going to be a dead weight on your team unless you spend time grinding.

In addition, any new characters you get won't have the same skill point base or optimal build that you've developed with your older ones, putting them at a significant disadvantage. it's more efficient, in terms of time spent, to stick with your initial roster that you begin the game with.

Playing Tactics Ogre "any way you want" is only possible if you're willing to put in the hours grinding new class levels and new recruit skills. Of course grinding isn't necessary to complete the game, but then you're highly limited in the amount of depth you can explore because grinding is required for so much of it.

Random encounters are frequent and encourage the player to grind, although you can thankfully avoid fighting random encounters and run away. Optional areas exist solely to pit players against randomly generated enemies with no other purpose than more repetitive filler battles. Clearing these areas even once will over level your party for the next story battles. Recruiting units is a boring, repetitive grind consisting of surrounding a weakened enemy and spamming the recruit skill until they yield.

The pace of combat is slow and tedious for no good reason, with no way to skip any animations. There are additional, intentional delays when the AI targets something or moves or performs any action at all. The slow combat speed makes an already repetitive and boring game even worse.

Moving on to the user interface, it's outdated and lacking features. There's no L/R function to switch between viable enemy or allied targets in target selection mode. There's no way to rotate the camera to anything but an overhead view - a huge issue for an isometric 3D game.

The menu tree is a UI disaster. Instead of a context sensitive cursor that intuitively speeds up the battle flow by allowing you to move, attack, etc. without going into a menu, you'll have to have to select move, attack, or wait every time. A common series of actions like moving then waiting takes 4+ extraneous button presses due to the poorly designed menus. Abilities, skills, and items are inexplicably split up into different menu trees for no particular reason. Multiply that by the tens of thousands of times you'll have to navigate the menus to perform the simplest action and combat speed is significantly slowed down.

The shop and party management screens are similarly cumbersome. There's no way to see a spreadsheet list of character stats, instead you're forced to view one stat at a time. You can't check whether your classes are at a given level to wear a piece of equipment or learn a spell from inside the shop - meaning if they're unable to equip a piece of gear, it doesn't tell you what level they have to be in order to equip it. Nor can you compare shop items and currently equipped gear.

The description text in the shops scrolls by at an agonizingly slow pace. Having to jump back and forth between the shop and party management screen when you're trying to outfit 12+ units is tedious.

There's no indication of what's new in a shop as the story develops, forcing you to scroll through absurdly long item lists hoping that you spot what's new mixed in with the old. This of course ties in with the attempt to befuddle the player with long lists of mostly useless items, gear, and skills.

On to the battle preparation interface, there's no way to preview the upcoming battle during preparations or see how your unit placement grid relates to their positions on the map, nor can you save during the placement grid screen. You're unable to change the battle party grid on the world map. You can't save during preparation while doing a series of linked missions inside a fortress, forcing you to do your party management all over again if you want to restart.

There's no button to immediately remove every person on the battle party grid, instead you have to do it manually. The skip cut scene button(s) are annoyingly inefficient. You'll need to use it multiple times times just to get through what should be a single cut scene. Post-battle results features a distracting and annoying flag waving around - seemingly a symbol of how little thought was put into the user interface in general.

The crafting system is tedious, obtuse, and needlessly time wasting. First, you can't check the stats of anything you want to craft, so you won't know whether it's worth the time and effort. Most materials needed to craft items are found in the store, which then need to be synthesized into more refined items. Why bother making the player combine base items into refined items when they could just sell the refined items instead? Although there are certainly some materials that are only obtainable from random encounters (read: more grinding).

After an eternity of repetitively clicking and watching a little jar shake around turning your store bought materials into refined materials and combining those refined materials together to finally make an item, you'll usually find out it wasn't even worth crafting in the first place. Even worse, there's a chance your crafting effort will completely fail. You can save/load until you succeed, but then why bother with a sadistic failure rate in the first place?

There are a series of mostly meaningless "titles" added to the remake, most of which are vapid "gimmie" awards and have little or no relation to the players skill level. The ever present level and skill grinding makes any sort of challenge completable by patience instead of skill.

An autosave system going by the gimmicky acronym of "chariot" is present in TO, along with unlimited quicksaves that make the autosave system fairly meaningless. There's a title for not using the autosaves, but then you can use quicksaves to achieve the same effect, so why bother with a "no autosave" title in the first place?

Some of the titles are more a reward of patience than skill, such as "Finish the game without ever retreating." Not retreating from optional battles makes the game easier to complete due to higher party stats. It's ironic when it takes more skill to deliberately avoid getting an "achievement" than it does to earn it.

Like most RPGs it's so riddled with flaws and loopholes that allow the player to avoid difficulty that it's pretty much useless as a measure of player skill. Tactics Ogre is useful as an emotional experience only.

The plot is a JRPG take on medieval history and legends, with the typical teenage melodrama, ham fisted morality, and evil villains you'd expect from a JRPG. The faux-olde English translation seems like a desperate attempt to give the plot some sort of authenticity and hide its JRPG trappings. I happen to like my medieval fantasy without the JRPG conventions.

Tactics Ogre is a traditional RPG shoehorned onto a turn based grid while failing to take advantage of the added potential depth that the turn based tactics genre offers. If all turn based tactics started playing like Tactics Ogre/FFT/Disgaea, the turn based tactics genre would be almost entirely pointless, and all that would be left is a lot of RPG-esque, grind heavy "sandbox" games. For that reason, Tactics Ogre is a series that would be better off as a traditional RPG, instead of making a mockery of the turn based tactics genre.

 

[DakaSha]

Obligatory:

Imbalanced, repetitive, grind heavy sandbox RPG w/ poor UI and slow combat​

Tactics Ogre: Let Us Cling Together for PSP is a remake of the original Tactics Ogre released in late 1995 on the Super Famicom. Tactics Ogre is not the "inventor", "innovator", or "the grandfather of" the tactics genre. Series such as Front Mission, Fire Emblem, Super Robot Wars, Langrisser, Daisenryaku, X-COM, Shining Force, Nectaris, Jagged Alliance, Panzer General, Famicom Wars, and well over 200 other turn based tactical level video games were released earlier than Tactics Ogre, and did just about everything TO did first. Nothing important about Tactics Ogre's game play was particularly new or innovative in 1995, let alone in 2011.

So how well does this remake stand up to the sleek, efficient, and well designed modern tactics games of today? Not very well. Tactics Ogre fails in its combat pacing, tactical variety and content, strategically meaningful depth, user interface, and difficulty.

Tactics Ogre is lacking in content variety. Almost every mission is completed by killing the enemy leader with a few token trash mobs strewn about. Almost every map is a hill gradually rolling from bottom to top. There are almost no scripted events or interesting things going on to speak of.

Almost all of the games depth - its physical attack and element types, skills, stats, statuses, spells, races, tarot signs, terrain, height, directional facing, finishing moves, battlefield conditions, and etc. can be soundly ignored in favor of a few simple strategies that are repeated ad nauseum. Tactics Ogres depth is strategically meaningless in the face of easy, simple, overpowered strategies. It doesn't get any more difficult or complex further into the campaign, either. As a result most fights are boring, easy, and repetitive.

Due to the poor level design and variety, I don't think TO challenge runs are particularly appealing. Not to mention you'll need to restrict yourself from using almost everything available, and the game will still be pretty easy regardless. Just like there are better tactics games to play, there are better tactics games to do challenge runs on.

Much of TOs depth is needlessly convoluted and confusing, on top of being mostly useless in favor of archers, TP, damage boosting skills, etc. Learning and casting spells is a convoluted process involving scrolls, skills, and "arcanas". Making one skill per enemy race and status effect only serves to pad out skill lists with useless chaff.

The insistence on obscurely naming every spell some sort of pseudo-latin gibberish is particularly ridiculous. It feels like an attempt to browbeat and befuddle the player with similarly strategically meaningless options that have little applicable effect on the game. Many times the shop and crafting list will flood with items and gear for classes you can't even use yet.

It's telling that mid way through the game the developers give up and hand you spells that cure all buffs/debuffs instead of creating an individual spell for each effect. The "Tactics Ogre is so deep!" emperor has no clothes.

The AI is incompetent, coded to run forward recklessly and hit the target that they'll do the most damage to. Even worse, the game constantly saddles you with uncontrollable, badly behaved AI allies. Your guest allies will ignore your own breakable crowd control such as sleep and won't exorcise undead.

When trying to save potential NPC recruits units that prefer to run away from you and not heal themselves, it's completely random as to whether they'll survive long enough for you to rescue them. Not that recruits are particularly valuable since they'll almost always have a worse skill set than what you can build onto the troops you begin the game with.

The developers require the player to grind to experience most of the games famed "depth". Classes all level up at once, but you can't level a class if it isn't used during a mission, and new classes start at level 1. Since level 1 classes tend to be very weak beyond chapter 1 you'll have to cripple your team or start grinding if you wish to bring a new class up to speed. This means any new class you get past chapter 2 is going to be a dead weight on your team unless you spend time grinding.

In addition, any new characters you get won't have the same skill point base or optimal build that you've developed with your older ones, putting them at a significant disadvantage. it's more efficient, in terms of time spent, to stick with your initial roster that you begin the game with.

Playing Tactics Ogre "any way you want" is only possible if you're willing to put in the hours grinding new class levels and new recruit skills. Of course grinding isn't necessary to complete the game, but then you're highly limited in the amount of depth you can explore because grinding is required for so much of it.

Random encounters are frequent and encourage the player to grind, although you can thankfully avoid fighting random encounters and run away. Optional areas exist solely to pit players against randomly generated enemies with no other purpose than more repetitive filler battles. Clearing these areas even once will over level your party for the next story battles. Recruiting units is a boring, repetitive grind consisting of surrounding a weakened enemy and spamming the recruit skill until they yield.

The pace of combat is slow and tedious for no good reason, with no way to skip any animations. There are additional, intentional delays when the AI targets something or moves or performs any action at all. The slow combat speed makes an already repetitive and boring game even worse.

Moving on to the user interface, it's outdated and lacking features. There's no L/R function to switch between viable enemy or allied targets in target selection mode. There's no way to rotate the camera to anything but an overhead view - a huge issue for an isometric 3D game.

The menu tree is a UI disaster. Instead of a context sensitive cursor that intuitively speeds up the battle flow by allowing you to move, attack, etc. without going into a menu, you'll have to have to select move, attack, or wait every time. A common series of actions like moving then waiting takes 4+ extraneous button presses due to the poorly designed menus. Abilities, skills, and items are inexplicably split up into different menu trees for no particular reason. Multiply that by the tens of thousands of times you'll have to navigate the menus to perform the simplest action and combat speed is significantly slowed down.

The shop and party management screens are similarly cumbersome. There's no way to see a spreadsheet list of character stats, instead you're forced to view one stat at a time. You can't check whether your classes are at a given level to wear a piece of equipment or learn a spell from inside the shop - meaning if they're unable to equip a piece of gear, it doesn't tell you what level they have to be in order to equip it. Nor can you compare shop items and currently equipped gear.

The description text in the shops scrolls by at an agonizingly slow pace. Having to jump back and forth between the shop and party management screen when you're trying to outfit 12+ units is tedious.

There's no indication of what's new in a shop as the story develops, forcing you to scroll through absurdly long item lists hoping that you spot what's new mixed in with the old. This of course ties in with the attempt to befuddle the player with long lists of mostly useless items, gear, and skills.

On to the battle preparation interface, there's no way to preview the upcoming battle during preparations or see how your unit placement grid relates to their positions on the map, nor can you save during the placement grid screen. You're unable to change the battle party grid on the world map. You can't save during preparation while doing a series of linked missions inside a fortress, forcing you to do your party management all over again if you want to restart.

There's no button to immediately remove every person on the battle party grid, instead you have to do it manually. The skip cut scene button(s) are annoyingly inefficient. You'll need to use it multiple times times just to get through what should be a single cut scene. Post-battle results features a distracting and annoying flag waving around - seemingly a symbol of how little thought was put into the user interface in general.

The crafting system is tedious, obtuse, and needlessly time wasting. First, you can't check the stats of anything you want to craft, so you won't know whether it's worth the time and effort. Most materials needed to craft items are found in the store, which then need to be synthesized into more refined items. Why bother making the player combine base items into refined items when they could just sell the refined items instead? Although there are certainly some materials that are only obtainable from random encounters (read: more grinding).

After an eternity of repetitively clicking and watching a little jar shake around turning your store bought materials into refined materials and combining those refined materials together to finally make an item, you'll usually find out it wasn't even worth crafting in the first place. Even worse, there's a chance your crafting effort will completely fail. You can save/load until you succeed, but then why bother with a sadistic failure rate in the first place?

There are a series of mostly meaningless "titles" added to the remake, most of which are vapid "gimmie" awards and have little or no relation to the players skill level. The ever present level and skill grinding makes any sort of challenge completable by patience instead of skill.

An autosave system going by the gimmicky acronym of "chariot" is present in TO, along with unlimited quicksaves that make the autosave system fairly meaningless. There's a title for not using the autosaves, but then you can use quicksaves to achieve the same effect, so why bother with a "no autosave" title in the first place?

Some of the titles are more a reward of patience than skill, such as "Finish the game without ever retreating." Not retreating from optional battles makes the game easier to complete due to higher party stats. It's ironic when it takes more skill to deliberately avoid getting an "achievement" than it does to earn it.

Like most RPGs it's so riddled with flaws and loopholes that allow the player to avoid difficulty that it's pretty much useless as a measure of player skill. Tactics Ogre is useful as an emotional experience only.

The plot is a JRPG take on medieval history and legends, with the typical teenage melodrama, ham fisted morality, and evil villains you'd expect from a JRPG. The faux-olde English translation seems like a desperate attempt to give the plot some sort of authenticity and hide its JRPG trappings. I happen to like my medieval fantasy without the JRPG conventions.

Tactics Ogre is a traditional RPG shoehorned onto a turn based grid while failing to take advantage of the added potential depth that the turn based tactics genre offers. If all turn based tactics started playing like Tactics Ogre/FFT/Disgaea, the turn based tactics genre would be almost entirely pointless, and all that would be left is a lot of RPG-esque, grind heavy "sandbox" games. For that reason, Tactics Ogre is a series that would be better off as a traditional RPG, instead of making a mockery of the turn based tactics genre.

The game is surely still (very even) flawed, but so many of the things in that list are fixed, it almost looks like a to-do list for the remake devs.
Posting it also makes you look a bit dumb

edit: I'll probably enjoy the playthrough (since its my first time), but definitely looking forward to the mods that are likely to make the game much much better. The FFT and TO modding scene are something else. edit again: (just realized i basically already said this. Eat my shit)