Lhynn has framed the argument in a way such that no evidence contradicting IT can possibly be produced.
You shouldnt need to produce evidence, it should be right there, in game. There should be something tangible outright saying, or at least directly pointing against IT.
Best someone could come up with was the retarded IA, which is less conclusive that magical growing plants in the final sequence before going up the citadel.
People say its because IT simply handwaves any piece of evidence away, but i dont buy it, or at least this is the first time ive found such a thing.
A completely different ending that actually fits withing the narrative with a decent twist? instead of the fantasy ending we got on a sci fi game? i dont know man, i just dont. Nothing on the game to disprove it, lots of small mistakes and lazy writing/design choices that when added up leave no choice but to think its deliberate.
A few months ago i finished reading a manga, the ending pretty straight foward. The protagonist and his friends were on a space ship that was self destructing, they made an escape in small shuttles and crash landed somewhere in the ocean in earth. We see them floating in the surface of the water looking at the sky, wondering if they are going to survive, showing sings of early dehydration. Then there is a fade to black and they are shown floating near a beach, all of the people they just saved and even their loved ones are there to hug them and nurse them back to health. The end.
What do you think happened? should i just take that at face value? the circumstances of how it was ended were about the same as in mass effect, the manga was declining so the author was rushed, it was a good, really popular manga that was a victim of its popularity.
Akratus when the actual events that just got erased dont add up to even half an hour i just dont give a fuck if it was just a dream.