imweasel
Guest
I guess I have to go into detail.http://cms.web.cern.ch/news/why-would-i-care-about-higgs-bosonWithout the higgs field all matter is massless. This has been said many times and is the current theory, not the brainfart that you just wrote.
Without the Higgs field, quarks would have no mass and consequently the proton would be heavier than the neutron, since all their mass would come from their respective binding energies. Now, without the Higgs field, the W− particle would have a much smaller mass, protons would spontaneously and almost instantly decay into neutrons — we would have a Universe without protons.
The Higgs field gives elementary particles their mass, and as you have pointed out, most of the mass of an atom results from the binding energies of protons' and neutrons' constituent quarks.
However, if the Higgs field did not exist or its average value were zero, these elementary particles (quarks and electrons), which aquire their mass from the Higgs field, would be massless. As a consequence, and according to the theory of general relativity, they would all travel at the speed of light. In other words, quarks and electrons would not be able to attract each to form atoms and all matter would simply "disintegrate" into massless elementary particles and energy.
As you can see, the Higgs mechanism is not the universal mass responsible detail, but the ultimate. Without the Higgs field matter would not have any mass and the universe as we know it would not exist.
Okie dokie.anyway, i'm done arguing with you.