Krivol
Magister
Why you lie?decent looter shooter
And I REALLY tried to love this game. TWICE!
Why you lie?decent looter shooter
Saying TOW is better than Starfield is like saying slamming your dick in the door is better than castrating yourself with a screwdriver. It's true, but you still shouldn't do it.Well it's better than StarfieldYou should drink detergent then play The Outer Worlds and report back to us which one was worse.I don't know what's worse, playing this or drinking detergents.
I don't know what's worse, playing this of your own volition or playing it on a console.
The point is that it makes you a disgusting degenerate console peasant.I don't know what's worse, playing this of your own volition or playing it on a console.
Since TOW plays like a console game and is designed with controllers in mind, it doesn't really matter which platform you play it on. It also doesn't feature graphics that makes it run poorly on a console (like BG3, for example), and it lacks a noteworthy modding scene.
Saying TOW is better than Starfield is like saying slamming your dick in the door is better than castrating yourself with a screwdriver. It's true...
It's simple.TOW goes out of its way to emulate the negative aspects of Bethesda titles while also being severely reduced in scope. What exactly is the argument for Starfield being worse?
Incredibly stupid writing, beyond awful (TOW is midwitted, Starfield is dimwitted). So much copy-paste filler content to the point where not even Beth fans are satisfied.TOW goes out of its way to emulate the negative aspects of Bethesda titles while also being severely reduced in scope. What exactly is the argument for Starfield being worse?
If I had to choose I'd MUCH rather play a game written by a swineherd than a Bay Area college graduate.TOW is midwitted, Starfield is dimwitted
Sounds damning, but I remember how people talked about Mass Effect Andromeda.Incredibly stupid writing, beyond awful (TOW is midwitted, Starfield is dimwitted). So much copy-paste filler content to the point where not even Beth fans are satisfied.TOW goes out of its way to emulate the negative aspects of Bethesda titles while also being severely reduced in scope. What exactly is the argument for Starfield being worse?
"I was told to make it casual" - Tim CainIt really does say volumes about modern game dev when modders are capable of creating a difficulty curve that shits all over anything the vanilla game has
It's honestly sad because the alternate route to getting Monarch access is actually terrifying now because there are mobs with 40 armor and 30k HP that you just cannot kill at that point, I had to actually sneak past some of them and play really tactically with the others."I was told to make it casual" - Tim CainIt really does say volumes about modern game dev when modders are capable of creating a difficulty curve that shits all over anything the vanilla game has
The point is that it makes you a disgusting degenerate console peasant.
They scaled up once with hard and then did one on top of that with extra features.Not really an excuse when there're difficulty levels.
actually as far as I can see Supernova doesn't even do anything to monster difficultyThey scaled up once with hard and then did one on top of that with extra features.Not really an excuse when there're difficulty levels.
Where did he say that? It explains all the lockpicking and hacking devices all over the place though..."I was told to make it casual" - Tim CainIt really does say volumes about modern game dev when modders are capable of creating a difficulty curve that shits all over anything the vanilla game has
>paying for gamesThe point is that it makes you a disgusting degenerate console peasant.
You're right. I'll start paying more for games everyone thinks are shit anyway and without an option to resell and get at least a little of my money back.