Krivol
Magister
Is it good?
Is it good?
it's sepate product, so no chance for better discounts, in the form of GotY edition or whatever
how to joined EA Access and does that come with discounts?
They have to make a buffer for EA Access subscriber exclusive discounts.
Dragon age 2 + DLCs 22.5 euros
Dragon Age Inquisition Gold 20 euros
Lol,EA gonna EA
BTW are the Unravel games any good,because they look like nice little games
They might give it for free to previous owners. It seems they did that with previous remasters.Kingdom of Amalur Re Reckoning is what I will deff buy. EA be praised.
Since Bioware is now just a subsidiary of EA how does that matter?
However, the DLC has never been on sale through the EA store. I think even to this day, you have to buy credits through Origin and then spend them in the Bioware store in game. The DLC is still its original price and it never goes on sale, which is annoying as the games themselves are dirt cheap, but buying all the DLC will still cost you like $60.
Man, this had been debunked by pretty much all economists since Marx, no serious economist take the absolute value of labour theory that Marx stole from Ricardo and Adam Smith serious anymore, socialism is a purely political movement now of people seeking for priviledges and inventing BS to justify it, there is no economic basis for it anymore, it is just a bunch of people crying about the world with stuff that could be easily classified along with stuff like: "Why do I need oxygen to live? That is unfair." "Why do I need to eat? That is unfair.", if they think it is unfair, they should go complain with God because we dont live forever or if they dont believe on it, go hug a tree or smoke pot for Mother Nature have pity of them.The fundamental socialist critique of wage labor is that it does not pay workers the value of what they produce.Wow, that socialism sure sounds a lot like a merit-based capitalist system.but a socialist company can sell products for profit without contradicting themselves provided the profit is distributed amongst the product's producers equitably or according to their labor contributions.
This is childish and shows you have no understanding of the current state of socialist political economy. Yes, there are socialist economists. No, not all accept the labor theory of value. Labor exploitation as defined by Marx may rely upon the labor-embodied theory of value--he was writing at a time when that theory was generally accepted--but others have constructed theories of exploitation not reliant upon the labor theory of value. The wikipedia article goes into detail on this. More importantly, I never advanced the labor theory of value in the what you quoted from me, so you're projecting your own ideas onto my writing.Man, this had been debunked by pretty much all economists since Marx, no serious economist take the absolute value of labour theory that Marx stole from Ricardo and Adam Smith serious anymore, socialism is a purely political movement now of people seeking for priviledges and inventing BS to justify it, there is no economic basis for it anymore, it is just a bunch of people crying about the world with stuff that could be easily classified along with stuff like: "Why do I need oxygen to live? That is unfair." "Why do I need to eat? That is unfair.", if they think it is unfair, they should go complain with God because we dont live forever or if they dont believe on it, go hug a tree or smoke pot for Mother Nature have pity of them.