After exactly 24 hours, the Figstarter has taken in $500,442 in pledges. By comparison, WL2 made 470k on the calendar day of its launch (i.e. in less than 24 hours), Torment made 1,488k and BT4 made 706k.
All of them, also one you didn't list... Wasteland 2 was shit, and people have little interest in seeing a sequel.So, a) alot of non-investor people hate Fig, b) People are fed up with crowdfunding, c)People are fed up with Fargo, d)People are cynical towards Wasteland 3: Multiplayer XCOM edition. Which of the options is true?
Pretty good reason I forgot, thank Lord Fargo is fixing that by adding multiplayer and cinematic visceral action.All of them, also one you didn't list... Wasteland 2 was shit, and people have little interest in seeing a sequel.So, a) alot of non-investor people hate Fig, b) People are fed up with crowdfunding, c)People are fed up with Fargo, d)People are cynical towards Wasteland 3: Multiplayer XCOM edition. Which of the options is true?
I think that changing the platform had the strongest effect. I backed a number of projects on KS but I'm not planning on signing up with Indiegogo or Fig. Especially Fig. So it's kinda like Steam, I'm guessing. Each platform has its own userbase and KS is by far the biggest. You switch to another platform and you get a much smaller userbase. I assume they thought that investors would make up for the difference.So, a) alot of non-investor people hate Fig, b) People are fed up with crowdfunding, c)People are fed up with Fargo, d)People are cynical towards Wasteland 3: Multiplayer XCOM edition. Which of the options is true?
I don't think that's a factor at all.Also that thing with running a 4th campaign having only delivered one game so far. It's a far cry from the "help us break free of evil publishers and make oldschool games again" heyday of 2012.
Yeah he shouldn't listen to this shit robot and he should have waited a half a year till T:ToN is out.Also that thing with running a 4th campaign having only delivered one game so far. It's a far cry from the "help us break free of evil publishers and make oldschool games again" heyday of 2012.
I dont mind the cinematics, but the multiplayer could be a very bad decision. And since WL2 was so great, then WL3 will be even better with co-op.Pretty good reason I forgot, thank Lord Fargo is fixing that by adding multiplayer and cinematic visceral action.All of them, also one you didn't list... Wasteland 2 was shit, and people have little interest in seeing a sequel.So, a) alot of non-investor people hate Fig, b) People are fed up with crowdfunding, c)People are fed up with Fargo, d)People are cynical towards Wasteland 3: Multiplayer XCOM edition. Which of the options is true?
I'm an example of someone who doesn't want a 4th campaign without at least 2 delivered products and one in the production phase.I don't think that's a factor at all.Also that thing with running a 4th campaign having only delivered one game so far. It's a far cry from the "help us break free of evil publishers and make oldschool games again" heyday of 2012.
How can that not be a factor? At the very least, people will not be encouraged to give their money again to a company who hasn't finished the games they promised and prefers to launch new campaigns and ask for more funds, instead.I don't think that's a factor at all.
We all have our preferences but I doubt that yours represent a significant %. The main question is why the vast majority of people backed WL2 and Torment (or why KS has become such a successful new thing in the first place). It's not a form of traditional investment with reason, accountability, and due diligence. It's because it's an exciting thing to do for most KS members and Fargo does a good job entertaining them with his videos. They don't do it to help him out, they do it because it's "fun" and they want to be part of it.I'm an example of someone who doesn't want a 4th campaign without at least 2 delivered products and one in the production phase.
Meanwhile, it's 97% funded after 2 days.
Give Fargo and Fig credit, they understood the reality of crowd funding fatigue and invented a workaround.
They're the first to stick it into a functioning game crowd funding platform so, yes, they deserve some credit. Remember... they don't have to give up a chunk of the company or their IP. That's hugely different from what "normal" investors expect.
I think they're quite happy with it as is. As to how happy, well... let's see what happens after they hit the investment cap.
I might have if they were on KS but multiplayer isn't my cup of tea, so I'd wait for some design updates first to make sure there is more to it than vehicles and multiplayer. The Stasis guys' art is fucking brilliant, so if they remain involved and design the locations, that'd be a strong selling point.Did you back it, Vault Dweller? You gave a very favorable review of WL2
Convenience is always a factor. The userbase NEVER fully migrates to other platforms. At best you get 20-30% (a lot less if we take Steam as an example). KS is an established community not just a platform to give money.Registering for Fig takes 5 mins, and the terms are the same as Kickstarter for regular backers. I don't buy the idea that this is a real barrier for people who actually want to back the game.
Registering for Fig takes 5 mins, and the terms are the same as Kickstarter for regular backers. I don't buy the idea that this is a real barrier for people who actually want to back the game.
That's probably not true. If Fargo and Co wouldn't care about the investment part and only cared about the pledges, chances are they wouldn't have established Fig. Fargo is a business man, I'm sure he knew that all of their backers won't migrate to this knew platform. The sole existence of fig means that they want the investments of rich people and they reached this with flying colors. They are getting funded in a few hours. And seeing that the pledges are only at 600K, it means they did great with Fig. Even though KS is more popular, they would have only gotten around 700K on it by this time. With FIG, they are funded. I'm sure they are happy with this and they will collect more money this way than they would have on KS.Also I don't think that Fargo and co are very happy with the results. The plan for them was always to keep their free part (the KS one) and to add to that private investments. If the KS part goes belly up, it's not doing great at all.