Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Wasteland 2 Kickstarter Update #25: Reactivity Up The Wazoo

Self-Ejected

Excidium

P. banal
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
13,696
Location
Third World
If you are going to have whole phrases instead of keywords and not really challenge the player in any way with it, why not just scrap the whole thing?
Because nostalgia.
 
Self-Ejected

Excidium

P. banal
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
13,696
Location
Third World
If you are going to have whole phrases instead of keywords and not really challenge the player in any way with it, why not just scrap the whole thing?
Because nostalgia.

Well, then get really nostalgic and give us real keywords!
You have to consider the people born without the ability to abstract. Check your privilege. Also stop pretending you're afk on IRC.
 

EG

Nullified
Joined
Oct 12, 2011
Messages
4,264
You have to consider the people born without the ability to abstract. Check your privilege.

I'm a boring and unimaginative person, therefore whatever I replace the abstraction with is boring an unimaginative. :smug:
 

Brother None

inXile Entertainment
Developer
Joined
Jul 11, 2004
Messages
5,673
God damn it, what the hell is the point of the keyword system then? Hey guys, here is the keyword system from wasteland. Except it is really just like the conversation system from fallout. If you are going to have whole phrases instead of keywords and not really challenge the player in any way with it, why not just scrap the whole thing?

Well...we'll look to include toggles so you can go back to a straight keyword system.

Furthermore, a keyword system allows us to split in local and regional keywords, let you build up a keyword library you can use with anyone in the region, and allow you to switch conversation tacks at any point, things that are harder to do or impossible with the Fallout system.

And as noted about, the typing in thing isn't *required*, but clever players should definitely find a use for it, and it can be used to dig up additional information.
 

Alex

Arcane
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Messages
8,753
Location
São Paulo - Brasil
Well...we'll look to include toggles so you can go back to a straight keyword system.

That is ok. I don't mind if the keywords as an aesthetic choice either way. I am just worried about their functionality. I mean, I think wanting to have full phrases instead of simple keyword a bit silly. They have worked great for more challenge oriented games like Wasteland for years, and worked well even in the Ultima series, which was a lot more "talky". But still, not a big deal, I think.

Furthermore, a keyword system allows us to split in local and regional keywords, let you build up a keyword library you can use with anyone in the region, and allow you to switch conversation tacks at any point, things that are harder to do or impossible with the Fallout system.

Switching is a nice feature, specially in a game where you may need to ask about a variety of things. Still, having a lot of reactivity to the environment like the example suggests is closer to fallout style dialog than keyword dialog, I think. I don't think this is a bad thing at all, though. The example Fargo gave us was pretty sweet. What I am worried about is, if the game is that reactive, and doesn't require player skill (see below) to know the keywords, wouldn't a fallout like dialog tree be a better fit?

And as noted about, the typing in thing isn't *required*, but clever players should definitely find a use for it, and it can be used to dig up additional information.

Now, this hits the problem squarely in the head, and I think it may have been a simple misunderstanding by my part (in which case, sorry). I understood that, by required, Fargo meant that any and all keywords (or, at least, all the useful ones) would be added to your list once you found them. In this case, typing is just a different input method. Now, maybe he just meant you would never need to type in keywords to finish the game. In this case, typing words could still be an important part of the gameplay, and the player would be required to keep an eye peeled about what is going on around him, as doing so could open all kinds of avenues simply having a high perception skill and clicking everything you see with it wouldn't.

This is similar to that text adventure vs graphic adventure thing, where in graphic adventures you always know what range of commands you have available to you. You know the answer to the puzzles is in using them in the correct manner. Whereas in a text adventure, there can always be a verb you forgot.

By the way, Brother None, congratulations on your new job!
 

Brother None

inXile Entertainment
Developer
Joined
Jul 11, 2004
Messages
5,673
To be fair, when inXile talked about this topic before it made it sounds like you could only switch outside of dialog. One of those "careful phrasing of information" things.

(surreptitiously coming to the rescue of my Doritos bro Infinitron)
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom