That's when you use your words man.No. None of the existing buttons convey the meanings perfectly...
We already have 4x the alphabet in buttons. What is this, back to the hieroglyphic age?
That's when you use your words man.No. None of the existing buttons convey the meanings perfectly...
Great idea tbh. Add another dozen or two of buttons, make them available to everyone, and replace the alphabet (all of them) with buttons.That's when you use your words man.No. None of the existing buttons convey the meanings perfectly...
We already have 4x the alphabet in buttons. What is this, back to the hieroglyphic age?
How about before implementing new buttons, implement the existing ones as smileys?
Semiurge, you deserve no buttons.
There never was one.Did we lose thebutton?
Smilies are the new buttons.With a few exceptions, the maximum height of button ratings is 22 pixels, which would require.![]()
Will get a boating related rating long before we get a car one; once upon a time we had someone offer to write boating articles for this prestigious magazine after all.As I recently made a post involving a fancy car, a thought occurred to me: The Codex doesn't have a 'Nice Car!'-rating.
It's not gonna be an often-used rating, but sometimes people post car-related things and people may want to point out how smooth or sweet the ride is, above all else.
So opinions people: Would a car-related rating be out of place in the current menagerie?
what is it with you and turtles?:turtle: covers both