Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Incline What can be done about excessive loot?

kangaxx

Arbiter
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
1,671
Location
atop a flaming horse
It's a while since I played Underrail but from memory that had a system that at least made me think (i.e. remember which vendors wanted which items, and how close they were). So I didn't just pick everything up and lug it around like a moron. Crafting also has a point.

Compare it to DOS2 where you end up carrying everything around, including paintings the size of a wall, and spending 2 hours selling it in the town square with a Scottish dyke asking Bree if she's keeping it together on repeat. Problem is that the scaling loot system is so bad in that game that you're incentivised to play loot gypsy. Crafting is pointless etc.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2020
Messages
279
First Witcher did this pretty well. You get new weapon and armor rougly each chapter, and most money is spend on knowledge (books, recipes etc). General loot you find from killing enemies are mainly ingredients. I don't think I ever found myself with a full invetory, trying to decide what loot should I leave behind.

It's also great because it supports the setting. Sure, gear is important, but witcher's main weapon are potions, his knowledge of monsters, and a fighting style designed to combat said mosters, not a new shiny sword or heavier armor. Sword is a sword and armor is armor (more or less).
 

Trithne

Erudite
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
1,200
I didn't play their Pathfinder games, so I dunno if this is the case there, but in Rogue Trader the loot is farcical. Every encounter has at least a dozen enemies, and you get the weapons and armour from all of them, and it's almost all useless, but if you leave any, when you exit the area it asks you "are you sure you want to leave all this awesome loot?", like it matters.

There is a "loot it all and dump it in your ship's cargo hold" button, but now it just clutters up my ship and I have no idea what to do with it, and if I want to find something in it, that's a multi minute ordeal.
 

kangaxx

Arbiter
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
1,671
Location
atop a flaming horse
I didn't play their Pathfinder games, so I dunno if this is the case there, but in Rogue Trader the loot is farcical. Every encounter has at least a dozen enemies, and you get the weapons and armour from all of them, and it's almost all useless, but if you any, when you exit the area it asks you "are you sure you want to leave all this awesome loot?", like it matters.

There is a "loot it all and dump it in your ship's cargo hold" button, but now it just clutters up my ship and I have no idea what to do with it, and if I want to find something in it, that's a multi minute ordeal.
I can confirm that the amount of loot in KM and WOTR is retarded. Even if you cut out non-magic weapons and items you get an avalanche of loot, much of it high level.

That said, I've heard it's a Pathfinder thing in general so it may not just be Owlcat.
 

Peachcurl

Arcane
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
10,677
Location
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
"More than you can carry" is nearly every RPG out there. That's hardly what anyone means by excessive loot, unless you're being fussy with semantics.
I am sorry Peachcurl, maybe i am misrepresenting your point. I am probably biased from the codex discussion of inventory restriction where i found out that many codex peasants what a vacuum cleaner attached to a bag of holding instead of any inventory restriction.
I kinda do want that. But only IFF loot is excessive to the extreme in the first place, as is the case in, say, modern Diablo-inspired games or some Bethesda games. The vacuum-cleaner-bag-of-holding is a tolerable band aid for a broken system.

I'd rather go for a loot model that has little, but relevant loot. Hand placed/designed if possible (but I'm fine with a well thought out randomized system).

Not necessarily without heavy inventory restrictions either. Making decisions is fine. For instance, in Sword of the Stars: The Pit you have to make choices what to take. Often. I'm fine with that. Every item counts in terms of survival, having actual value, beyond just throwing it at a vendor. Survival is the core theme of the gameplay, so that works for me.
 

Norfleet

Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
12,250
I can confirm that the amount of loot in KM and WOTR is retarded. Even if you cut out non-magic weapons and items you get an avalanche of loot, much of it high level.
It's the natural consequence of fighting tool-using enemies. Humans use weapons like yours. Therefore, when you kill them, you should, naturally, get their weapons. Games where you kill a dude that has a fancy gun and for some strange reason there's nothing on him, annoy everyone.

I'd rather go for a loot model that has little, but relevant loot. Hand placed/designed if possible (but I'm fine with a well thought out randomized system).
Yes, but then you still have the issue of "enemies". Even if there's absolutely nothing of worth found in random chests and barrels, the fact remains: If you kill an enemy, he had weapons he was using to menace you with. You rightly should get those weapons. Wargear's good loot in and of itself! The only way around that is for the bulk of enemies to not be humanoids, like in the aforementioned "Alien Shooter", where you kill aliens, but obviously, aliens don't have any gear so there's no reason to expect any loot on them.
 

Norfleet

Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
12,250
und, including paintings the size of a wall, and spending 2 hours selling it in the town square with a Scottish dyke asking Bree if she's keeping it together on repeat. Problem is that the scaling loot system is so bad in that game that you're incentivised to play loot gypsy. Crafting is pointless etc.
Isn't DOS2 the game where you play as a moving black hole, accumulating everything that has mass to create a singularity of destruction by simply rolling over everything with said mass?
 

mediocrepoet

Philosoraptor in Residence
Patron
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
13,536
Location
Combatfag: Gold box / Pathfinder
Codex 2012 Codex+ Now Streaming! MCA Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2
und, including paintings the size of a wall, and spending 2 hours selling it in the town square with a Scottish dyke asking Bree if she's keeping it together on repeat. Problem is that the scaling loot system is so bad in that game that you're incentivised to play loot gypsy. Crafting is pointless etc.
Isn't DOS2 the game where you play as a moving black hole, accumulating everything that has mass to create a singularity of destruction by simply rolling over everything with said mass?
DOS2 guy as Katamari Damacy? :lol:
 

gaussgunner

Arcane
Joined
Jul 22, 2015
Messages
6,159
Location
ХУДШИЕ США
I just finished reading The Recollections of Rifleman Harris today, a memoir by a British soldier in Portugal & Spain during the Napoleonic Wars. They (try to) loot very often as you might expect, are constantly surrounded by corpses, but still never have anything good in their inventory.
[.....]

Good post, food for thought even if not directly applicable to RPGs where you're more like professional soldier(s) of fortune paid big money to mass-slaughter ragtag enemies or monsters. It's not unrealistic for five white guys to rout a small army of Africans, it's been done many times. Even in underdog RPG scenarios you quickly rise to professional level so you shouldn't need to loot corpses for a living throughout the whole game.

Regarding more "solutions":
- Unlimited inventory leads to annoying gameplay
- Limited merchant cash is annoying; too realistic
- Weapon/armor degradation is annoying busywork
- Fixed inventory slots fail to account for small vs large items
- Not bad with keyrings and small item stacking
- Inventory tetris is annoying and computer can automate it; pointless system bloat
- Weight limits aren't bad
- Encumbrance is annoying
- Weapon/armor combat-only encumbrance is nice but doesn't prevent loot hoarding
- Spiderweb's unlimited "junk bag" (no item withdrawl in combat) isn't bad
- Payment per kill is an abstraction of that, but still rewards pointless killing, but so does XP
- Payment for quest completion (like Witcher notice board quests) is fine
- Quests only (no grinding opportunities) is annoying

My preference is fixed inventory slots or fixed weight limits, ability to loot all items you can potentially use yourself, small semirandom per-kill payments, larger quest payments, no loot selling, but full refunds for items you just bought.
 

Victor1234

Educated
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Messages
255
I just finished reading The Recollections of Rifleman Harris today, a memoir by a British soldier in Portugal & Spain during the Napoleonic Wars. They (try to) loot very often as you might expect, are constantly surrounded by corpses, but still never have anything good in their inventory.
[.....]

Good post, food for thought even if not directly applicable to RPGs where you're more like professional soldier(s) of fortune paid big money to mass-slaughter ragtag enemies or monsters. It's not unrealistic for five white guys to rout a small army of Africans, it's been done many times. Even in underdog RPG scenarios you quickly rise to professional level so you shouldn't need to loot corpses for a living throughout the whole game.

Regarding more "solutions":
- Unlimited inventory leads to annoying gameplay
- Limited merchant cash is annoying; too realistic
- Weapon/armor degradation is annoying busywork
- Fixed inventory slots fail to account for small vs large items
- Not bad with keyrings and small item stacking
- Inventory tetris is annoying and computer can automate it; pointless system bloat
- Weight limits aren't bad
- Encumbrance is annoying
- Weapon/armor combat-only encumbrance is nice but doesn't prevent loot hoarding
- Spiderweb's unlimited "junk bag" (no item withdrawl in combat) isn't bad
- Payment per kill is an abstraction of that, but still rewards pointless killing, but so does XP
- Payment for quest completion (like Witcher notice board quests) is fine
- Quests only (no grinding opportunities) is annoying

My preference is fixed inventory slots or fixed weight limits, ability to loot all items you can potentially use yourself, small semirandom per-kill payments, larger quest payments, no loot selling, but full refunds for items you just bought.
I've played a lot of games with inventory systems & loot but some of those concepts from the book have never come up. I think aside from Unreal World (and even there it's more about sacrificing some loot to the spirits than not taking it in the first place) nobody has ever made me worried about items being cursed or making me cursed if I take them before. Usually in popular culture that stuff boils down to an Indiana Jones style trap trigger than an actual curse anyways.

My favorite 'solution that recognizes the problem will always exist' comes from a Mount & Blade Warband mod. Set up a companion to be the wagonmaster and literally have an almost-unlimited inventory wagon follow your party around. You take whatever loot you want into your own inventory, leftovers go into the wagon automatically and then when you click a button, it automatically goes to the nearest town to convert everything to cash without your involvement.

That same mod (Brytenwalda, the dudes went on to make the Viking Conquest DLC) also had an interesting loot division mechanism. All loot auto-collected at the end of the battle but you get a choice about how to divide it. If you're greedy and keep too much for yourself, your minions hate you, if you give most to them, you obviously get only a little loot for yourself.
 

Norfleet

Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
12,250
It's not unrealistic for five white guys to rout a small army of Africans, it's been done many times.
That's the thing, isn't it? They rout. They don't line up and file directly into the alien death cannons in an attempt to clog them with wreckage. You don't, realistically, get to chase them all down and mug them for their loot since they scatter in all directions and chasing them would likely lead you into an ambush (and most of them don't have any good loot anyway, and that's a big part of why they're losing).

Even in underdog RPG scenarios you quickly rise to professional level so you shouldn't need to loot corpses for a living throughout the whole game.
It's not about NEED. It's about being THOROUGH.
 

almondblight

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Messages
2,628
Once again we come to the issue that RPGs attract people coming from fundamentally different camps. We have people who come from the tactical side - there should be fewer, more difficult fights, and they should be unique. Then we have people coming from the slot-machine side - variable time reward players who want to repetitively do the same thing for hours and see numbers go up. Go look at a playthrough of a blobber on Youtube, and listen to someone mindlessly tap tap tapping through trash mobs. Or see the complaints that the problem with PoE 1 wasn't that there were so many trash mobs, but they didn't reward you with (enough) experience.

The latter group (which is probably the majority of people here, if we're being honest) are responsible for a lot of garbage that makes games tedious for other players. But for them it's exciting, a little tiny reward after you mindlessly off every trash mob, and they get lots of "stuff," even though almost all of it is unnecessary garbage.
 
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,876,733
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
Players don't feel bad about leaving their illici- hard earned loot behind if they still profit in some way. Just let the player dismantle it for resources. Crafting materials if the game has crafting, consumables if not (ammo, repair kits, sharpening tools, etc)
 

Old Hans

Arcane
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
2,123
If you kill an enemy, he had weapons he was using to menace you with. You rightly should get those weapons. Wargear's good loot in and of itself!
Just like in Fellowship of the Ring, when Gandalf and the gang spend an entire chapter collecting orc shields to sell to the vendor.
 

agris

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
6,927
Once again we come to the issue that RPGs attract people coming from fundamentally different camps. We have people who come from the tactical side - there should be fewer, more difficult fights, and they should be unique. Then we have people coming from the slot-machine side - variable time reward players who want to repetitively do the same thing for hours and see numbers go up. Go look at a playthrough of a blobber on Youtube, and listen to someone mindlessly tap tap tapping through trash mobs. Or see the complaints that the problem with PoE 1 wasn't that there were so many trash mobs, but they didn't reward you with (enough) experience.

The latter group (which is probably the majority of people here, if we're being honest) are responsible for a lot of garbage that makes games tedious for other players. But for them it's exciting, a little tiny reward after you mindlessly off every trash mob, and they get lots of "stuff," even though almost all of it is unnecessary garbage.
get outta my head
 

CHEMS

Scholar
Joined
Nov 17, 2020
Messages
1,694
LOOT IS LOVE
LOOT IS LIVE

I enjoy collecting every kind of object that can be found in the game and autistically storing them in player homes by category

If i can't loot in a game i won't even play it
 
Self-Ejected

Dadd

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
2,727
If you kill an enemy, he had weapons he was using to menace you with. You rightly should get those weapons. Wargear's good loot in and of itself!
Just like in Fellowship of the Ring, when Gandalf and the gang spend an entire chapter collecting orc shields to sell to the vendor.
We need time limits in RPGs. Not only that, but the enemies advance their goals concurrently with you. I've always found it dumb that the evil lord twiddles his thumb while the hero has infinite time to gear up and kill him.
 

Old Hans

Arcane
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Messages
2,123
If you kill an enemy, he had weapons he was using to menace you with. You rightly should get those weapons. Wargear's good loot in and of itself!
Just like in Fellowship of the Ring, when Gandalf and the gang spend an entire chapter collecting orc shields to sell to the vendor.
We need time limits in RPGs. Not only that, but the enemies advance their goals concurrently with you. I've always found it dumb that the evil lord twiddles his thumb while the hero has infinite time to gear up and kill him.
you could set a time limit of 10,000 years and players would still complain. They'd be all

"I've had multiple anxiety attacks playing this game, because of the time limit. All I wanna do is relax and spend 10k years collecting and selling orc shields to the vendor, but the developers are rushing me with this nazi time limit"

then the story would get picked up by Polygon with a headline that reads "this new RPG game has a time limit and its driving players insane. Its being compared to Nazi Germany"
 

Butter

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
8,615
you could set a time limit of 10,000 years and players would still complain. They'd be all

"I've had multiple anxiety attacks playing this game, because of the time limit. All I wanna do is relax and spend 10k years collecting and selling orc shields to the vendor, but the developers are rushing me with this nazi time limit"

then the story would get picked up by Polygon with a headline that reads "this new RPG game has a time limit and its driving players insane. Its being compared to Nazi Germany"
Being mildly controversial gets you free publicity courtesy of 90IQ Kotaku writers.

soyjak-gigachad.png
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2021
Messages
206
Location
Arkansas
Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming!
I crashed my PS3 when FONV came out and I stuffed too much junk into a container in the hotel. You can pry trash loot from my cold dead hands (to hoard it yourself).
 
Last edited:

Norfleet

Moderator
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Messages
12,250
We need time limits in RPGs. Not only that, but the enemies advance their goals concurrently with you. I've always found it dumb that the evil lord twiddles his thumb while the hero has infinite time to gear up and kill him.
Time limits would help with the issue, but likely be unpopular in their own right. Enemy progression, on the other hand, might accomplish this same result while being cool, especially if the effects of this are directly visible and can be combatted by the player. Games like JA2 and Space Rangers had the world progress if the player simply did nothing, with potentially negative results for the player.
 

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,704
Location
Ingrija
This remind me of robbery in Jagged Alliance 2. You can hit a target 3 unarmed strike and he fall down to ground. Use Ctrl Click on the body to rob their weapons, which should cost 20AP (in 25 AP system). After successfully rob him, kill him will yield only armors and or miscelanous, no weapon.

1.13 with "drop everything" was truly a blessing from the Lord.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom