IDtenT
Menace to sobriety!
Do you think DU is free?Blackmail apparently.Useful for what?
Do you think DU is free?Blackmail apparently.Useful for what?
everyone not a member of antifa is a nazi to them you stupid fuck
Useful for what?
The only people who should have an eye kept on them are creepy autistic weirdos that live in their parent's basement and spend their free time doxxing people on the interneteveryone not a member of antifa is a nazi to them you stupid fuck
When Luckmann mentioned it here of course I went and searched for it and followed the link. In this particular case, they are 100% correct in their nazi assessment and Luckmann wouldn't even deny this.
This is a bit like the JF thing where some newbies refused to believe he was a real, self-identifying, unironic nazi.
Useful for what?
Keeping an eye on in case of problems later on down the line.
"This guy's such a nazi that antifa have compiled a dossier on him" is useful knowledge for a site's administration to have.
Have no idea about that. And it is expected that they will cooperate with authorities lol. What do you think this place is,some dark web organ smuggling and red room emporium???Hmm yet i haven't noticed anyone actually losing them or getting scammed in real life. Clearly the security must be ok if nobody had ended up whining how he owns 150k because he ordered three containers with toilet paper from india.DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
Wasnt Jarl Frank harassed by german authorities, and codex gave all the data like good lapdogs?
Oh, so it wasn't for the (((T)))-word? So it would be fine if I found out someone else's real life name and started posting it as long as I wasn't """obsessed""" and wasn't expressly forbidden from using that particular name? Or would that actually go against Codex rules and get me banned? Which is it?Right to access (or mere practical ability to access) aside, the key issue is that it was shared on this forum in contradiction to Codex rules, rules that have been recently cited in the banning of many users.
Kalin received a temp ban for being obsessed, other people following his example received temp bans for being insubordinate.
Well it goes both way,we do have some deranged deformed trannies that believe far left garbage too. But yeah both luck and jarl are far right people,same as me and many other codexers.everyone not a member of antifa is a nazi to them you stupid fuck
When Luckmann mentioned it here of course I went and searched for it and followed the link. In this particular case, they are 100% correct in their nazi assessment and Luckmann wouldn't even deny this.
This is a bit like the JF thing where some newbies refused to believe he was a real, self-identifying, unironic nazi.
Useful for what?
Keeping an eye on in case of problems later on down the line.
What are you,twelve?Have no idea about that. And it is expected that they will cooperate with authorities lol. What do you think this place is,some dark web organ smuggling and red room emporium???Hmm yet i haven't noticed anyone actually losing them or getting scammed in real life. Clearly the security must be ok if nobody had ended up whining how he owns 150k because he ordered three containers with toilet paper from india.DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
Wasnt Jarl Frank harassed by german authorities, and codex gave all the data like good lapdogs?
They dont operate in germany retard, they don't have to do jackshit if german authorities ask them. Its in their good[bad]will to share such information to german authorities.
If the user whose name you keep mentioning doesn't approve of it, it'd be against forum rules regardless of whether he had freely shared that info himself in the past or not. Same as in the case of Maxie demanding that Planetard should stop sharing that photo of him which he had previously posted.Oh, so it wasn't for the (((T)))-word? So it would be fine if I found out someone else's real life name and started posting it as long as I wasn't """obsessed""" and wasn't expressly forbidden from using that particular name? Or would that actually go against Codex rules and get me banned? Which is it?
I must admit, it was me all along...I wonder who's the rat? I only know of one rodent in a position of power, but I have nothing against them.
What are you,twelve?Have no idea about that. And it is expected that they will cooperate with authorities lol. What do you think this place is,some dark web organ smuggling and red room emporium???Hmm yet i haven't noticed anyone actually losing them or getting scammed in real life. Clearly the security must be ok if nobody had ended up whining how he owns 150k because he ordered three containers with toilet paper from india.DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
Wasnt Jarl Frank harassed by german authorities, and codex gave all the data like good lapdogs?
They dont operate in germany retard, they don't have to do jackshit if german authorities ask them. Its in their good[bad]will to share such information to german authorities.
Can you PM me you personal information?This is a bit like the JF thing where some newbies refused to believe he was a real, self-identifying, unironic nazi.
And if that's the case, the admins/mods shouldn't be acting otherwise unless absolutely necessary.If the user whose name you keep mentioning doesn't approve of it, it'd be against forum rules regardless of whether he had freely shared that info himself in the past or not. Same as in the case of Maxie demanding that Planetard should stop sharing that photo of him which he had previously posted.Oh, so it wasn't for the (((T)))-word? So it would be fine if I found out someone else's real life name and started posting it as long as I wasn't """obsessed""" and wasn't expressly forbidden from using that particular name? Or would that actually go against Codex rules and get me banned? Which is it?
What information? You had provided only infantile make believe garbage. If you think that sites could just ignore government investigations,then you are a fucking retard lol.What are you,twelve?Have no idea about that. And it is expected that they will cooperate with authorities lol. What do you think this place is,some dark web organ smuggling and red room emporium???Hmm yet i haven't noticed anyone actually losing them or getting scammed in real life. Clearly the security must be ok if nobody had ended up whining how he owns 150k because he ordered three containers with toilet paper from india.DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
Wasnt Jarl Frank harassed by german authorities, and codex gave all the data like good lapdogs?
They dont operate in germany retard, they don't have to do jackshit if german authorities ask them. Its in their good[bad]will to share such information to german authorities.
Yes or no? Do you deny the information i've provided?
What information? You had provided only infantile make believe garbage. If you think that sites could just ignore government investigations,then you are a fucking retard lol.What are you,twelve?Have no idea about that. And it is expected that they will cooperate with authorities lol. What do you think this place is,some dark web organ smuggling and red room emporium???Hmm yet i haven't noticed anyone actually losing them or getting scammed in real life. Clearly the security must be ok if nobody had ended up whining how he owns 150k because he ordered three containers with toilet paper from india.DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
Wasnt Jarl Frank harassed by german authorities, and codex gave all the data like good lapdogs?
They dont operate in germany retard, they don't have to do jackshit if german authorities ask them. Its in their good[bad]will to share such information to german authorities.
Yes or no? Do you deny the information i've provided?
Ahhh another muh freedom idiot without any connection to the real world....oh well.What information? You had provided only infantile make believe garbage. If you think that sites could just ignore government investigations,then you are a fucking retard lol.What are you,twelve?Have no idea about that. And it is expected that they will cooperate with authorities lol. What do you think this place is,some dark web organ smuggling and red room emporium???Hmm yet i haven't noticed anyone actually losing them or getting scammed in real life. Clearly the security must be ok if nobody had ended up whining how he owns 150k because he ordered three containers with toilet paper from india.DU gives the impression he doesn't give a shit about these serious aspects (data privacy laws, etc).If someone other than a Codex moderator or administrator
Is this within lawful processing as deemed by law? What is the rationale of sharing that data if it doesn't serve any purpose as quoted within lawful processing realms[transaction processing, payment, taxes, or other state mandated activities]?
Are moderators employees of the company that accept the payments, ie. greg martin enterprise? If not that's a breech of law for sure.
Wasnt Jarl Frank harassed by german authorities, and codex gave all the data like good lapdogs?
They dont operate in germany retard, they don't have to do jackshit if german authorities ask them. Its in their good[bad]will to share such information to german authorities.
Yes or no? Do you deny the information i've provided?
Retard australia doesn't abide by german law you fucking dumbfuck, unless they have agreement about shared prosecution of certain crimes.
Im done talking to you inbred bulgar.
You seem upset.I have to admit it is triggering me.
The only people who should have an eye kept on them are creepy autistic weirdos that live in their parent's basement and spend their free time doxxing people on the internet
Oh, so it wasn't for the (((T)))-word? So it would be fine if I found out someone else's real life name and started posting it as long as I wasn't """obsessed""" and wasn't expressly forbidden from using that particular name? Or would that actually go against Codex rules and get me banned? Which is it?
That is the only reason i kept going on with this meaningless discussionI have to admit it is triggering me.
You are our friendly stalker-kun for sure,i do like you tho. You maybe be a bit weird but i have never felt like you are malicious or nasty in your stalky shit.I actually was scrutinized back in my more rambunctious days.
Yeah, you've proven beyond any doubt you are a hypocrite.Good thing that isn't me.
Yes. Oh no, someone looked up someone's personal information and shared it with a select few others. Additionally
What do you think this thread is about?If it's on the internet, I have the right to access it.