Sol Invictus
Erudite
Its rubbish. There's that lovely save game bug for example. Did you know that when you load a save game all of the AI's build queues, move orders and political biases are WIPED?
Kthan75 said:OK, didn't know that...
But the game rocks anyway...
Speaking of Rome... I know a couple of people that played the game mostly for the economical part, on the world map. They had the computer decide the outcome of the battle for them, relying solely on numbers... I think that's sad. The real time strategy component is the best part about the game, IMO. I took great pleasure when I managed to win a battle even if the odds were against me, by using the special abilities of each unit.
How did you guys play the game?
You make a good point.youhomofo said:OH MY GOD U STUPID SHITS!!!! HOW U DONT EVEN MENTION FINAL FANTSY TACTIS???? THAT IS LIKE THE FIRST FUCKING TACTICS GAME EVER U WOUDNT EVEN HAVE YOUR OTHER CRAPASS GAMES IF NOT FOR THAT ONE U STUPID FUCKING TUMOR BRAINED SHITMOUTHED CUMSTAINS!!! I HOPE WHEN U DADDY GET DONE RAPING UR MOUTH U GET THE AIDS!!!!!!
wallace said:Alpha Centauri here. There's just something so sexy about a cold war.
Huh? may I ask, what exactly you think its flaw was?Starcraft (original, Brood Wars was pretty limp),
I've tried it recently and it's rather nice, but there was something mentioned about custom hero characters to start with. I couldn't get that to work, am I missing something there?AZ said:The patched version of Lords of Magic is very enjoyable too. But, I played Total Annihilation a lot.
mEtaLL1x said:Huh? may I ask, what exactly you think its flaw was?
I can't see any.
In fact, in terms of strategy (not story), BW was *BETTER* in every way possible. Believe me, I know what i'm talking about.
But if you're talking about story - well, it's purely a matter of taste. I loved both parts.
copx said:Civ2.