Apostle Hand
Death Knight
now the poll choice is unlimited
Makes more sense grappling than striking, at least on heavy plate.Not sure what is my favorite weapon in RPGs. But I know what kind of weapon I really don't like in games: fists. I mean, you're literally punching heavy armored knight with your bare hands. That's beyond stupid.
Yeah, we can say it's some kind of a magic martial art, but it's absolutely illogical. If you can punch a hole through a person with your fist, imagine what you could do with this same person with something more solid - like, sword, for example!
I think the idea of adding monk class to D&D wasn't the best.
That's assuming the loot is always inseparable from the character though.What good is the loot for anyway?
Dark Messiah of Might and Magic - (The Good, The Bad, The Ugly) : r/patientgamers
The most effective way to kill 90% of enemies is to kick them off of cliffs. If there are no cliffs around, prepare for a slog. Final Thoughts.
Nah, it's still in need of some expansion.now the poll choice is unlimited
Dark Souls' Sen's Fortress area is great for that, it is as much avoiding the traps as leveraging them to defeat the enemies.I like it when monsters kill each other or walk into trap rooms and die.
A bit of unfair criticism since you will always give up on some loot, the warrior with the big club doesn't have to justify why he's renouncing to every cool bow, shield, wand he might find. Not to mention the guy who specializes in gnomiesh hook hammers, who is certainly not finding interesting new varieties often.Not only that, but using the character's fists also prevents that char from equiping and trying out all kinds of weapons. What good is the loot for anyway? Picking a class which relies mostly on bare hands has to be one of the most boring decisions in a rpg i can imagine. Because of this, introducing monks into D&D just really seemed like a massive fail decision.
Or that class in TOME4 that uses two shields. :DWhat about Shield? Poor Captain America, he sad now.