how magnanimous lolI am going to give you a chance to knock this off because of your contributions to the front page.
Who would you like to see get banned? Give us a listBut only one person, not the other who got involved and caused shit stirring.
In case you aren't aware, a lot of years back, way before you or me here, the MCA himself graced this place with his divine presence. And he rightfully, all those years back, called out yehuditron for being a dishonest shillThat's what you created, @Infinitron. Fuck the *front page contributions*, instead of spending time finishing up something I've been writing recently I log on and see people get banned for bullshit. But only one person, not the other who got involved and caused shit stirring. Then a ban for a reaction to the first, a retarded solution to a problem you created in the first place. Either accept the Codex for what it is, in that case leave The Wall be. Or, if you so desperately want to clean things up, ban him and the person who started shit with him.
Chris Avellone's "Inflamatron" post:In case you aren't aware, a lot of years back, way before you or me here, the MCA himself graced this place with his divine presence. And he rightfully, all those years back, called out yehuditron for being a dishonest shillThat's what you created, @Infinitron. Fuck the *front page contributions*, instead of spending time finishing up something I've been writing recently I log on and see people get banned for bullshit. But only one person, not the other who got involved and caused shit stirring. Then a ban for a reaction to the first, a retarded solution to a problem you created in the first place. Either accept the Codex for what it is, in that case leave The Wall be. Or, if you so desperately want to clean things up, ban him and the person who started shit with him.
Did the jew change his habits? Rhetorical question
I called IHaveAHugeNick a shill when I was hiding his Obsidian developer past and took away "shill" when he became public about it - and now, going back through the responses in this, I realize I was coasting off my poor wordplay with "colossal fatass" (referring to myself) in insulting Nick with fuckery. How derivative.
I don't think I called Infinitron a hack or shill, I had mentioned I didn't think he posted news - he finds news but the way he posts it (like with this piece) adds a spin to things that didn't have it before based on his own perspective, which may be (but not always) incorrect.
His dramatic headlines were what caused some unusual reactions to happen in the past, although they were overall good for me, it wasn't because they were true at all.
I don't mind if you feel you have to embellish or add your opinions to a piece, but at that point, you don't call it news - you call it a community update, an editorial commentary, big ol' pile o' stuff, or something that isn't news. It's not even an insult to him, just a point I'm making.
I'm used to his word framing of his releases by now to the point I feel he should be dubbed Inflamatron, and will lobby incessantly to make it so.
Also, on a serious note - which I brought up already: before he posts here, or worse, decides to go to other forums and posts, he should make absolutely certain he knows what facts he's posting - because aside from the drama, if it's incorrect, it probably won't end well.
Oh, Infinitron, the joke is simple: That you report the news, as your unfortunate profile tag claims, which always make me wince when I see your claim. C'mon, don't be ridiculous. You are so biased, we can't even see you through the glare, but embrace it: It's part of your charm.
EDIT: I really mean this. I love Infinitron's comments, but it's not news, it's just... Infinitron. Change your profile tag, bud.
LOL.Chris Avellone's "Inflamatron" post:In case you aren't aware, a lot of years back, way before you or me here, the MCA himself graced this place with his divine presence. And he rightfully, all those years back, called out yehuditron for being a dishonest shillThat's what you created, @Infinitron. Fuck the *front page contributions*, instead of spending time finishing up something I've been writing recently I log on and see people get banned for bullshit. But only one person, not the other who got involved and caused shit stirring. Then a ban for a reaction to the first, a retarded solution to a problem you created in the first place. Either accept the Codex for what it is, in that case leave The Wall be. Or, if you so desperately want to clean things up, ban him and the person who started shit with him.
Did the jew change his habits? Rhetorical question
I called IHaveAHugeNick a shill when I was hiding his Obsidian developer past and took away "shill" when he became public about it - and now, going back through the responses in this, I realize I was coasting off my poor wordplay with "colossal fatass" (referring to myself) in insulting Nick with fuckery. How derivative.
I don't think I called Infinitron a hack or shill, I had mentioned I didn't think he posted news - he finds news but the way he posts it (like with this piece) adds a spin to things that didn't have it before based on his own perspective, which may be (but not always) incorrect.
His dramatic headlines were what caused some unusual reactions to happen in the past, although they were overall good for me, it wasn't because they were true at all.
I don't mind if you feel you have to embellish or add your opinions to a piece, but at that point, you don't call it news - you call it a community update, an editorial commentary, big ol' pile o' stuff, or something that isn't news. It's not even an insult to him, just a point I'm making.
I'm used to his word framing of his releases by now to the point I feel he should be dubbed Inflamatron, and will lobby incessantly to make it so.
Also, on a serious note - which I brought up already: before he posts here, or worse, decides to go to other forums and posts, he should make absolutely certain he knows what facts he's posting - because aside from the drama, if it's incorrect, it probably won't end well.
partisan hackChris Avellone's "Inflamatron" post:In case you aren't aware, a lot of years back, way before you or me here, the MCA himself graced this place with his divine presence. And he rightfully, all those years back, called out yehuditron for being a dishonest shillThat's what you created, @Infinitron. Fuck the *front page contributions*, instead of spending time finishing up something I've been writing recently I log on and see people get banned for bullshit. But only one person, not the other who got involved and caused shit stirring. Then a ban for a reaction to the first, a retarded solution to a problem you created in the first place. Either accept the Codex for what it is, in that case leave The Wall be. Or, if you so desperately want to clean things up, ban him and the person who started shit with him.
Did the jew change his habits? Rhetorical question
I called IHaveAHugeNick a shill when I was hiding his Obsidian developer past and took away "shill" when he became public about it - and now, going back through the responses in this, I realize I was coasting off my poor wordplay with "colossal fatass" (referring to myself) in insulting Nick with fuckery. How derivative.
I don't think I called Infinitron a hack or shill, I had mentioned I didn't think he posted news - he finds news but the way he posts it (like with this piece) adds a spin to things that didn't have it before based on his own perspective, which may be (but not always) incorrect.
His dramatic headlines were what caused some unusual reactions to happen in the past, although they were overall good for me, it wasn't because they were true at all.
I don't mind if you feel you have to embellish or add your opinions to a piece, but at that point, you don't call it news - you call it a community update, an editorial commentary, big ol' pile o' stuff, or something that isn't news. It's not even an insult to him, just a point I'm making.
I'm used to his word framing of his releases by now to the point I feel he should be dubbed Inflamatron, and will lobby incessantly to make it so.
Also, on a serious note - which I brought up already: before he posts here, or worse, decides to go to other forums and posts, he should make absolutely certain he knows what facts he's posting - because aside from the drama, if it's incorrect, it probably won't end well.
It could be that once all this banning is over, we look and say: "And then there were none".
Every hour can be schizo hour if we put in some effort.Real schizo hours around here huh.
Absolutely based. Goes without saying, Avellone is the only Obshitian-related goy with any talent, unlike these FAGGOTS Josh Soyer and Tim Cuckain. "Hey guys it's me, Tim". Who says that. What a faggot. Hey Tim, how about that: STOP MOLESTING LITTLE BOYS AND GO BACK TO YOUR COUNTRY.LOL.Chris Avellone's "Inflamatron" post:In case you aren't aware, a lot of years back, way before you or me here, the MCA himself graced this place with his divine presence. And he rightfully, all those years back, called out yehuditron fhor being a dishonest shillThat's what you created, @Infinitron. Fuck the *front page contributions*, instead of spending time finishing up something I've been writing recently I log on and see people get banned for bullshit. But only one person, not the other who got involved and caused shit stirring. Then a ban for a reaction to the first, a retarded solution to a problem you created in the first place. Either accept the Codex for what it is, in that case leave The Wall be. Or, if you so desperately want to clean things up, ban him and the person who started shit with him.
Did the jew change his habits? Rhetorical question
I called IHaveAHugeNick a shill when I was hiding his Obsidian developer past and took away "shill" when he became public about it - and now, going back through the responses in this, I realize I was coasting off my poor wordplay with "colossal fatass" (referring to myself) in insulting Nick with fuckery. How derivative.
I don't think I called Infinitron a hack or shill, I had mentioned I didn't think he posted news - he finds news but the way he posts it (like with this piece) adds a spin to things that didn't have it before based on his own perspective, which may be (but not always) incorrect.
His dramatic headlines were what caused some unusual reactions to happen in the past, although they were overall good for me, it wasn't because they were true at all.
I don't mind if you feel you have to embellish or add your opinions to a piece, but at that point, you don't call it news - you call it a community update, an editorial commentary, big ol' pile o' stuff, or something that isn't news. It's not even an insult to him, just a point I'm making.
I'm used to his word framing of his releases by now to the point I feel he should be dubbed Inflamatron, and will lobby incessantly to make it so.
Also, on a serious note - which I brought up already: before he posts here, or worse, decides to go to other forums and posts, he should make absolutely certain he knows what facts he's posting - because aside from the drama, if it's incorrect, it probably won't end well.
Infinitron Put "got roasted by Chris Avellone" in your resume.
Real schizo hours around here huh.
Real schizo hours around here huh.
I mean if i remember his lore right, he got family ancestry from the former yugoslavia area so there's certain a bias in ihere.I tend to believe Infi has a grudge against Serbians, they are getting banned one by one.