Lesifoere
Liturgist
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2007
- Messages
- 4,071
WanderingThrough2 said:I liked Safiya, but let's not forget that she's also romanceable in a totally implausible manner. (Possibly explicable because the underlying connection between her and the PC, but I don't know if that's particularly satisfactory.) She's also got the whole vulnerable/scared thing going on with the voices in her head.
I didn't romance her, but I recall that she's able to deal with those voices fairly well on her own. Safiya may have problems, but she doesn't require babying to get through them, which is what Bioware characters do.
I'm not sure the qualities you go on to list though -- a man who's lost a loved one and is a veteran of wars and as a result has emotional baggage -- is really a compelling criticism of Bioware. Isn't that a basic framework that's important and worth examining, even over and over again?
Not when the character has the same type of dialogue over and over again, is voiced by the same actor, looks identical, etc etc. It's nice how you ignored those points.
FFG is... not exactly naive, you know.
It's been years since I played the game, but my recollection was that she did have a naive, vulernable streak with respect to the PC, and went around blushing at everyone's inuendoes. But it's been a while.
Huh? No. If anything, I recall Annah getting flustered by Grace, and FFG traded suggestive comments with Morte with no problem. FFG's main objection to kissing TNO is that if she does so, she'd kill him and despite his immortality, dying mustn't be very pleasant. Actually, now that I'm browsing the "novelization" (which is the game's dialogue gathered in a long word document), she doesn't even get flustered when TNO asks her about being a "camp follower." She just calmly explains that she wasn't raped, as such.
Maybe it's that Gann wasn't loved as a child and never had a stable home, so he needs you to give him a place where he fits in.
Having gone through his romance, I was pleasantly surprised by how little psychotherapy he needs. Also, that you can gain influence with him by being snarky toward him, not just by agreeing with every single thing that he spouts. Morte wasn't particularly childish, either. Burdened by guilt, sure, but not emo. Dak'kon was probably the worst/most codependent of the lot.
Bioware does the same thing for its male and female characters. Heck, you even note it above, writing with respect to the Carth model that he's "supposed to be a mature adult, but behaves much younger, being prone to blushing" and "is loaded with a lot of emotional baggage." You add that he makes "obvious attempts to garner sympathy" and makes embarassing "confessions of undying love."
Isn't that the very essence of being "deep down an emotionally vulnerable child who can neither function nor think without the aid of the ... PC"?
Maybe, but with the exception of Ashley (whom, apparently, a lot of Biotards hate--no idea why), the female ones are particularly bad. Liara has the emotional depth of a small spoon and constantly tries to throw herself at the PC; Aerie's level of emotional damage has never been matched by any of the male NPCs, and I still haven't seen any male Bioware character flip-flop between the "dark" and "light" sides only to be redeemed by true love and then fall apart in the female PC's slim-yet-strong arms. Bioware's female NPCs not only lack depth--they don't even have any semblance of dignity.
The subliminated gay romances of LOTR don't require all the characters pandering to each other and working through their childhood letdowns.
Wait, what? The subliminated... gay romances? Not that I don't find it amusing, being familiar with the LOTR fandom, but are you suggesting it's actually canon?