Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

First person is not more immersive than Third person view

jf8350143

Liturgist
Joined
Apr 14, 2018
Messages
1,285
Unless you are using VR, otherwise both FPP and TPP are not immersive. Unless you like to play as someone who can't turn neck or eyeball and can only see things right in front of them.

So TPP is much better because it allows you to access more info. As a matter of fact TPP is closer to how you see things in real life comparing to FPP.
 
Last edited:

Saduj

Arcane
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Messages
2,552
To me, “immersion” just means I’m really into the game. Doesn’t mean I actually believe I am in the game world because I am not a character in a bad made for TV movie that preaches the dangers of fantasy role playing games.

A turn based based game can cause more tension than an FPS if the difficulty is there AND as a player you care about the stakes. Obviously, the opposite could also be true.
 

S.torch

Arbiter
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
943
That's the opposite of immersion dude, immersion is about feeling like it's you, being there, in that world.

And again, I want to know how do you feel part of a world were you don't have even the most basic sense of weight or orientation. I already asked the question, and I got a few "fake news ratings" but unsurprisingly, no arguments. Probably because there's none.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
And again, I want to know how do you feel part of a world were you don't have even the most basic sense of weight or orientation. I already asked the question, and I got a few "fake news ratings" but unsurprisingly, no arguments. Probably because there's none.

"Orientation" I don't really know wtf you're talking about. You have the same ability to orient yourself to your surroundings as you do in real life. It's third-person that is unnatural and shows you more than you'd normally see. As for weight... meh. It's only recently that third-person games have really focused on that, and usually (like with Red Dead 2 recently) I find it gets in the way of gameplay smoothness more than anything. Also no one's saying first-person is perfection, just more immersive.

Also I feel the need to point out "immersion" and "realistic" are two different things. Video game realism is vastly overrated, outside of sim games, and being immersed in a game world doesn't require strict realism like "weight" or whatever else.
 

Lemming42

Arcane
Joined
Nov 4, 2012
Messages
6,159
Location
The Satellite Of Love
Otherwise it could be just another nameless drone from a generic first person shooter in which your character is nothing but a floating gun and floating hands. Games like Kingdom Come knew this, because while most of the game is in first person, you can see your character very often during conversations or cutscenes.

That's an interesting thing to say because I think I'm "immersed" more with silent first-person protagonists more than I am with third person protagonists, or even protagonists who just have voice acting and strong pre-written characterisation, like JC Denton.

People love protagonists like Gordon Freeman, the Hacker, Doomguy etc even though they have literally no personalities and never speak (other than the Hacker's very short personal log entry). They're all meant to just essentially be you. They never speak because they say whatever you'd say, they never react to anything because they react however you'd react. Surely that's the peak of "immersion", nebulous though the concept is.

With RPGs the goal shouldn't necessarily be immersion anyway. I'm not immersed in Fallout, because I'm not meant to be inserting myself into the game or feeling as if I'm really there. I'm meant to be roleplaying a character (who ideally isn't just a shitty self-insert) and guiding him or her through the world. Same with Deus Ex, like I said earlier - I don't feel like the player is meant to feel as if they actually are JC or actually inhabit the game's world, which is why it's not jarring to have him speak or see him in third person during dialogue.
 

S.torch

Arbiter
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
943
It's third-person that is unnatural and shows you more than you'd normally see.

What an incredible display of lack of self-awareness. First person perspective in videogames is not "natural" neither, humans don't have the tunnel vision that videogames use, we have a wider range of view that is blurred which give us a sense of placement, alarm and body control. If you can't even notice this when is literally in front of you, obviously you will say something like this

You have the same ability to orient yourself to your surroundings as you do in real life.

You can sense the wind in a videogame? You can sense the frost or the sun? No. In real life you do, so you don't have to look at yourself to know that you're in a desertic dune. In a game you need to look at your character to get this sense of orientation. Otherwise is just a poor attempt of simulation.
 
Last edited:

octavius

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
19,226
Location
Bjørgvin
It's called "filling in the gaps".

As for tunnel vision, many/most games have adjustable Field of View. Or it may simulate wearing a hood or helmet. Anyway, how hard is it to look around in game with mouselook?
 
Last edited:

Beastro

Arcane
Joined
May 11, 2015
Messages
8,096
So you know what the most immersive game is? Some scuba simulator, because IT LITERALLY CANNOT GET MORE IMMERSIVE THAN BEING LITERALLY IMMERSED.

Lies. Nothing is more immersive than a good old fashion 90s FMV fest:

iu
 

KeighnMcDeath

RPG Codex Boomer
Joined
Nov 23, 2016
Messages
13,062
Isn't it all technically 2D? I mean I can't physically pick it up and lick it. Come on star trek holosuite.
 

Generic-Giant-Spider

Guest
To me, “immersion” just means I’m really into the game. Doesn’t mean I actually believe I am in the game world because I am not a character in a bad made for TV movie that preaches the dangers of fantasy role playing games.

A turn based based game can cause more tension than an FPS if the difficulty is there AND as a player you care about the stakes. Obviously, the opposite could also be true.

I agree with this. Having moments where you had the RNG swing your way and save you from a possible party death is one of those moments of immense relief from all the nervous leg shaking leading up to that. Also makes it more satisfying when you make a mid-fight recovery and emerge victorious.
 

Saduj

Arcane
Joined
Aug 26, 2012
Messages
2,552
To me, “immersion” just means I’m really into the game. Doesn’t mean I actually believe I am in the game world because I am not a character in a bad made for TV movie that preaches the dangers of fantasy role playing games.

A turn based based game can cause more tension than an FPS if the difficulty is there AND as a player you care about the stakes. Obviously, the opposite could also be true.

I agree with this. Having moments where you had the RNG swing your way and save you from a possible party death is one of those moments of immense relief from all the nervous leg shaking leading up to that. Also makes it more satisfying when you make a mid-fight recovery and emerge victorious.

Yeah I was actually thinking about the first time I was trying to beat Dungeon Rats. Ending the turn and then praying whatever happens next isn’t too bad....
 

Lurker47

Savant
Joined
Jul 30, 2017
Messages
721
Location
Texas
FPP would be the best perspective if it didn't almost always mean that the combat isn't turn-based (the obvious exception are dungeon-crawlers.)
 

Lurker47

Savant
Joined
Jul 30, 2017
Messages
721
Location
Texas
Joined
Jun 24, 2019
Messages
696
Nothing immerse me more in a game than background sound effects(especially with headphones),it's one of the main things i loved about infinity engine games.

Looks at this shit:



the background sound effects really makes this place feel cold and real.

Edit: i forgot to say,i using loudness Equalization that makes me hear sound effects better,just turn on loudness Equalization in your sound settings,it's a lot better !
 
Last edited:

mondblut

Arcane
Joined
Aug 10, 2005
Messages
22,250
Location
Ingrija
if it didn't almost always mean that the combat isn't turn-based (except in all the games where it is.)

What was your point again?
You know it.

If Wizardry, Might & Magic, Realms of Arkania and countless others are not "first person" enough for you, you are part of the problem.
OK, but what about shooters

Shooters as well might not exist. This is GRPGD. :obviously:
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom