I will bring buttons back

[laclongquan]

I havent played Oblivion so I dont know how correct your example is.

But if you change it to Fallout New Vegas I might get it.

FNV with mods and all the dlcs.
FNV with DLCs.
FNV main campaign only.

 

[Kruno]

Vaccines have been known to cause AIDS. Don't vaccinate the RPG Codex, just vaccinate your kids!

 

[Luckmann]

What was all this waiting for then?

:itsamystery:

This is what you get without buttons - posts specifically just to rate other posts.

:yes:

 

[Luckmann]

the brofist is a symbol associated with the most notorious nazi of modern times

pewdiepie

:brofist:

 

[Luckmann]

Make buttons only available for Patrons.

:inclining_arrow:

 

[Luckmann]

Make buttons only available for Patrons.

Only if they set up some other way to pay other than fucking Paypal.

 

[Luckmann]

:YES!:

:yes:

 

[BBMorti]

So DarkUnderlord wrote he will bring buttons back if he gets 150 brofists, but he didn't write 'If I get 150 brofists, or more'. So since he now have another amount of brofists than 150, does that mean he promise is null and void?

 

[mastroego]

Faulty logic.
First Question: did he get 150 brofists?
Yes.
Second Question: did he get more than 150?
Also Yes.
The second answer being "Yes" doesn't make the first answer a "no".

 

[Makabb]

 

[ColonelTeacup]

And so, the people have spoken. I will indeed bring the buttons back.

Eventually.

Ok, this is actually really fucking funny.

 

[Koschey]

Rating buttons are just instant gratification awesome buttom wankery. Good for a lark, but seeing how much faster the Codex loads now that they are gone, it is no loss. Brofists can disappear as well, for all I care.
People who only joined after buttons were introduced espousing opinions like "Ratings are essential to the Codex experience" should definitely be watchwitzed, though.

Faulty logic.
First Question: did he get 150 brofists?
Yes.
Second Question: did he get more than 150?
Also Yes.
The second answer being "Yes" doesn't make the first answer a "no".

If at 149 brofists he received 2 brofists at exactly the same time, the answer to the first question is no. Guess we'll need a fistlog to crack this nut.

 

[Squid]

Are non-button users allowed to even have an opinion on this?

Seemed to me like there was just too many of them and their point gets watered down. DU's gonna do what DU's gonna do though. I hope it's something spicy.

 

[aris]

How the hell am I supposed to hand out participation awards now?

 

[Bohr]

How the hell am I supposed to hand out participation rewards now?

 

[Luckmann]

Just implement an "Ignore Ratings" function for faggots posters troubled by ratings.

:YES:

 

[Tse Tse Fly]

Rate other people's posts like you never did, make separate comments with your ratings, do this a lot, then the admins will get tired of the incessant spam and ban you bring the buttons back! Fight for your happiness!

Ratings add more activity and liveliness to the forum, make it more fun and worth checking more often.

 

[Orma]

no button no cry

 

[Burning Bridges]

Faulty logic.
First Question: did he get 150 brofists?
Yes.
Second Question: did he get more than 150?
Also Yes.
The second answer being "Yes" doesn't make the first answer a "no".

If at 149 brofists he received 2 brofists at exactly the same time, the answer to the first question is no. Guess we'll need a fistlog to crack this nut.

I dont get it.

As of today 9:14pm the post already received 192 brofists. If a post receives 192 brofists the statement "this post received 150 brofists" cannot be true at the same time.

Also, most of the people who voted are fags.

 

[Cat]

Think about Oblivion: completionists spend 200+ hours in the game, while minimalists spend only 10 hours (because they only play the main campaign).

People played the main quest?

 

[Deleted member 7219]

Rate other people's posts like you never did, make separate comments with your ratings, do this a lot, then the admins will get tired of the incessant spam and ban you bring the buttons back! Fight for your happiness!

Ratings add more activity and liveliness to the forum, make it more fun and worth checking more often.

YES!

 

[mastroego]

Rating buttons are just instant gratification awesome buttom wankery. Good for a lark, but seeing how much faster the Codex loads now that they are gone, it is no loss. Brofists can disappear as well, for all I care.
People who only joined after buttons were introduced espousing opinions like "Ratings are essential to the Codex experience" should definitely be watchwitzed, though.

Faulty logic.
First Question: did he get 150 brofists?
Yes.
Second Question: did he get more than 150?
Also Yes.
The second answer being "Yes" doesn't make the first answer a "no".

If at 149 brofists he received 2 brofists at exactly the same time, the answer to the first question is no. Guess we'll need a fistlog to crack this nut.

You're wrong, he would have been instantly bumped from 149 to 151 Brofists, ok, but this doesn't matter.
Because in that same moment DU would be the owner of 151 Brofists... but ALSO the owner of 150 Brofists. And the owner of 128 Brofists, for that matter.

This is how reasoning works with mathematics and set theory.

 

[Brozef]

Faulty logic.
First Question: did he get 150 brofists?
Yes.
Second Question: did he get more than 150?
Also Yes.
The second answer being "Yes" doesn't make the first answer a "no".

If at 149 brofists he received 2 brofists at exactly the same time, the answer to the first question is no. Guess we'll need a fistlog to crack this nut.

I dont get it.

As of today 9:14pm the post already received 192 brofists. If a post receives 192 brofists the statement "this post received 150 brofists" cannot be true at the same time.

Also, most of the people who voted are fags.

That is your brain on social sciences.
While my brofist consists of five digits, I also have one to greet you with.

 

[Koschey]

You're wrong, he would have been instantly bumped from 149 to 151 Brofists, ok, but this doesn't matter.
Because in that same moment DU would be the owner of 151 Brofists... but ALSO the owner of 150 Brofists. And the owner of 128 Brofists, for that matter.

This is how reasoning works with mathematics and set theory.

You would be right if the condition had been to get 'at least 150 brofists'. As it is, the statement is vague and can be read to ask implicitly for either 'exactly 150' or 'at least 150' fists. Since buttons are for fags, we are forced to conclude that it is the more restrictive condition. Mathematical reasoning requires precise phrasing.

 

[Deleted member 7219]

And so, the people have spoken. I will indeed bring the buttons back.

Eventually.

Acknowledge this user’s agenda