Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Preview Alpha Protocol Video Walkthrough

kris

Arcane
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
8,890
Location
Lulea, Sweden
First video I seen of the game and my earlier enthuiasm have died. It really do look like a game you just kill your way through. Many other details like how you are in a big firefight outside that building, but when you enter most of the ones inside seems totally oblivious to that firefight having happened. It had the "RPG" skills "kill" and "kill".
 

thesheeep

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
10,098
Location
Tampere, Finland
Codex 2012 Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Torment: Tides of Numenera Codex USB, 2014 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
kris said:
First video I seen of the game and my earlier enthuiasm have died. It really do look like a game you just kill your way through. Many other details like how you are in a big firefight outside that building, but when you enter most of the ones inside seems totally oblivious to that firefight having happened. It had the "RPG" skills "kill" and "kill".


Errrh.... wasn't that an E3 presentation?
Do you really think anyone would show anything that is not mainly combat there?

Just saying that this video is probably not representative for the whole game ;)
 

catfood

AGAIN
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
9,592
Location
Nirvana for mice
I tried to watch the video but I couldn't because all those stupid arrows, cubes, square, circles all sorts of geometrical objects colored in all the colors of the rainbow, inane messages like "PRES X BUTAN TO JUMP HEAR", health bars, and other such garbage kept popping up on the screen. Shit, it was worse than a IE window after visiting porn and warez sites.
 

Rosh

Erudite
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,775
catfood said:
I tried to watch the video but I couldn't because all those stupid arrows, cubes, square, circles all sorts of geometrical objects colored in all the colors of the rainbow, inane messages like "PRES X BUTAN TO JUMP HEAR", health bars, and other such garbage kept popping up on the screen. Shit, it was worse than a IE window after visiting porn and warez sites.

They have to make it shiny and simple, given their target audience.

People who might have liked Mass Effect but were too stupid to understand the setting.

Mass Effect Solid
 

kris

Arcane
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
8,890
Location
Lulea, Sweden
thesheeep said:
kris said:
First video I seen of the game and my earlier enthuiasm have died. It really do look like a game you just kill your way through. Many other details like how you are in a big firefight outside that building, but when you enter most of the ones inside seems totally oblivious to that firefight having happened. It had the "RPG" skills "kill" and "kill".


Errrh.... wasn't that an E3 presentation?
Do you really think anyone would show anything that is not mainly combat there?

Just saying that this video is probably not representative for the whole game ;)

then they better show that. I think that one showed quite a bit about the direction. Big shiny things to pick up, mindless enemies that is nothing more than a swarm of mosqitos. More than one path? Absent. Non-violent solution? Absent.
 

circ

Arcane
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
11,470
Location
Great Pacific Garbage Patch
I'm liking what Anthony is saying about being able to kill just about anyone and diverging story lines. But I'm not liking the really jaggedy character moves. Hopefully that's in the polishing stages.

And please please someone at Obsidian redo the gun addons. I don't want to be reminded of ME in that too. Look at JA2 mods if you want to see what you can do with gun addons. Also, throw a jacket on the russian spy, and add exhalation vapor? If it's snowing I'd think it's cold enough for that. Also the guns in some angles look downright shitty. If viewed from the front, in that addon screen, it looks way too thin.

Way too much combat filler though.
 

Rosh

Erudite
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,775
circ said:
I don't want to be reminded of ME in that too.

What isn't there to remind you of ME in this title, since it's an ME clone?

Oh, my! Non-lethal takedowns! Yet that is far more time-consuming and comparatively worthless to just going in guns blazing. Why spend a couple of minutes sneaking around enemies when you can just kill them in a couple of seconds?

Face it, Obsidian is full time BioWare puppet now. A pity, too.
 
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,876,731
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
SimpleComplexity said:
"Oh luk im low on health, im gunna press button for health kit hyuk hyuk"

stim.gif
?

Oh, my! Non-lethal takedowns! Yet that is far more time-consuming and comparatively worthless to just going in guns blazing. Why spend a couple of minutes sneaking around enemies when you can just kill them in a couple of seconds?

JCDenton.jpg
?
 

Hümmelgümpf

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
2,949
Location
St. Petersburg, Russia
Rosh said:
Oh, my! Non-lethal takedowns! Yet that is far more time-consuming and comparatively worthless to just going in guns blazing. Why spend a couple of minutes sneaking around enemies when you can just kill them in a couple of seconds?
The same can be said about almost any game that offers both stealthy and commando approach, including Fallout, Arcanum, Torment and Bloodlines. Deus Ex is pretty much the only exception I'm aware of, and once you max out the Rifles skill, even it can be played as a corridor shooter. Double standards?
 

Rosh

Erudite
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,775
Clockwork Knight said:

From all the displays so far, Deus Ex appears to be an improvement in that regard. In Mass Effect Solid, it doesn't look like a default option but instead something you need to tailor your character towards. That kind of limits the amount of ability to avoid killing...for whatever reason avoiding killing might have in this game.

"I avoided killing all of your guards. Can I have a cookie now?"
 

Hümmelgümpf

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
2,949
Location
St. Petersburg, Russia
Rosh said:
From all the displays so far, Deus Ex appears to be an improvement in that regard. In Mass Effect Solid, it doesn't look like a default option but instead something you need to tailor your character towards. That kind of limits the amount of ability to avoid killing...for whatever reason avoiding killing might have in this game.
...

...

...

...

...

Are you complaining about Alpha Protocol requiring the player to invest skill points into stealth/hacking/lockpicking in order to be good at it? :headdesk:
 

Rosh

Erudite
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,775
Hümmelgümpf said:
The same can be said about almost any game that offers both stealthy and commando approach, including Fallout, Arcanum, Torment and Bloodlines.

Avoidance != non-lethal takedowns. In fact, none of the above have non-lethal takedowns.

Deus Ex is pretty much the only exception I'm aware of, and once you max out the Rifles skill, even it can be played as a corridor shooter. Double standards?

I counter with Thief, where the difference between lethal and non-lethal takedowns was handled excellently.
 

Rosh

Erudite
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,775
Hümmelgümpf said:
Are you complaining about Alpha Protocol requiring the player to invest skill points into stealth/hacking/lockpicking in order to be good at it? :headdesk:

No, it involves you to put the design points into context. Deus Ex offered non-lethal takedowns because of the story and setting.

With Alpha Protocol, you have to put points into a skill in order to make the undercover NSF agents like Paul happy. Therefore the gameplay would be railroaded into being one or the other, not whichever might be needed for the situation, and so there would be little player choice. Skills determining gameplay decisions like this is a little weak, almost like Mass Effect's dialog railroading.

There's no choice and consequences, unless you count the choice of where to put the skill points.
 

Hümmelgümpf

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
2,949
Location
St. Petersburg, Russia
Rosh said:
I counter with Thief, where the difference between lethal and non-lethal takedowns was handled excellently.
There was a significant difference? You sneak up on a guy and hit him with a sword/arrow/dagger -> he dies. You sneak up on a guy and hit him with a blackjack -> he is knocked out.
With Alpha Protocol, you have to put points into a skill in order to make the undercover NSF agents like Paul happy. Therefore the gameplay would be railroaded into being one or the other, not whichever might be needed for the situation, and so there would be little player choice. Skills determining gameplay decisions like this is a little weak, almost like Mass Effect's dialog railroading.

There's no choice and consequences, unless you count the choice of where to put the skill points.
I'm at a loss of words. I really am.
 

Rosh

Erudite
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,775
Hümmelgümpf said:
Rosh said:
I counter with Thief, where the difference between lethal and non-lethal takedowns was handled excellently.
There was a significant difference? You sneak up on a guy and hit him with a sword/arrow/dagger -> he dies. You sneak up on a guy and hit him with a blackjack -> he is knocked out.

I'm at a loss of words. I really am.

There's no choice and consequences, unless you count the choice of where to put the skill points.
I'm at a loss of words. I really am.

To a non-stealthy character there would have been no way to make Paul or the NSF happy. Your choice and consequences would have been railroaded just like the dialog in Mass Effect. But that's okay. According to Obsidian, there will be a path for the stealthy guy and a path for the guns blazing kind of guy.

That way Paul won't be angry if you kill the terrorists in corridor B.

Convenient, eh?

Anyways, it's a fairly moot point until Obsidian actually shows some reason for it, because in all of their videos so far, stealth would have been a waste.
 

Hümmelgümpf

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
2,949
Location
St. Petersburg, Russia
Rosh said:
I'm at a loss of words. I really am.
Explain what you liked about how Thief handled killing/knocking people out.
To a non-stealthy character there would have been no way to make Paul or the NSF happy. Your choice and consequences would have been railroaded just like the dialog in Mass Effect. But that's okay. According to Obsidian, there will be a path for the stealthy guy and a path for the guns blazing kind of guy.

That way Paul won't be angry if you kill the terrorists in corridor B.

Convenient, eh?
Do some research before you start bitching. There are tranquilizer rounds for firearms in Alpha Protocol.
 

Dionysus

Scholar
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
345
I don't think Deus Ex did the best job of handling skills, but it did have great level design, and I've seen absolutely no evidence of that sort of thing in AP. In order to reward stealth, they need to put some friction in the levels (like Deus Ex's bots and turrets) or at least have some quests that can only be performed by characters that focus on stealth. Although the latter option is probably impossible to balance because most of the skills are directly related to combat. I doubt you will sacrifice much by focusing on only one or two of the five "kill" skills.

I am happy to see that they've got a lot of enemies that throw grenades. It's unfortunate that they seem to think that the player needs a pop-up whenever a grenade lands near him. This seems like another case in which PC devs underestimate the capabilities of the console gaming demographic. Plenty of people bought Halo, and that didn't have pop-ups when an enemy tossed a grenade. In fact, all that crap on the screen might turn a lot of people off.
 

Rosh

Erudite
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,775
Hümmelgümpf said:
Explain what you liked about how Thief handled killing/knocking people out.

What, aside from the whole noise and leaving a mess difference? One would leave a static spot to alert the other patrols, the other would keep the guards completely unaware.

Do some research before you start bitching. There are tranquilizer rounds for firearms in Alpha Protocol.

Fair enough, I suppose. I can't wait for sniper rifles with tranq rounds.
 

Hümmelgümpf

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
2,949
Location
St. Petersburg, Russia
Rosh said:
What, aside from the whole noise and leaving a mess difference? One would leave a static spot to alert the other patrols, the other would keep the guards completely unaware.
Fair enough, I suppose. It's more of an AI problem, though, and it's something I'd like to see improved too.
 

Rosh

Erudite
Joined
Oct 22, 2002
Messages
1,775
Hümmelgümpf said:
Fair enough, I suppose. It's more of an AI problem, though, and it's something I'd like to see improved too.

AI, in a BioWare engine? You're kidding, right? :D
 

Wyrmlord

Arcane
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
28,904
Rosh said:
Hümmelgümpf said:
Fair enough, I suppose. It's more of an AI problem, though, and it's something I'd like to see improved too.

AI, in a BioWare engine? You're kidding, right? :D
BioWare engine?

It's a common engine they use that was made by another developer.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
1,658
Location
Prussia
Clockwork Knight said:
SimpleComplexity said:
"Oh luk im low on health, im gunna press button for health kit hyuk hyuk"
stim.gif
?
Your point? Fallout wasn`t a perfect game, everytime you used a stim pack it should cost you some AP for each, when going into the inventory you could use it without limitations. My guess is that this was overseen by the designers while in AP they intentionally want to make it that easy. Of course it all depends on how much of these medi packs you`ll have, by the look of it probably it`ll cost 100$ or so and your budget will be 50k$. I`d also prefer it if the health regeneration is slower. Untill then -> FOTY award.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom