Fedora Master
STOP POSTING
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2017
- Messages
- 31,738
So you can escape quickly at any point in the game.Why is there an "Exit Anthem" button in the options menu?
It's science fantasy, not sci-fi.Is this supposed to be the revived cadaver of a canceled Mass Effect MMO, or Bioware's unfortunate attempt at capeshit?
It's science fantasy, not sci-fi.
Doesn't have much in relation to mass effect at all
Video preview from Giant Bomb.
This days we are getting spoiled on AAA flops. I am hopping for andromeda level of memeing.Oh my god I hope this will be a F76 level disaster on release, that would be truly glorious...
FO76 is infinitely worse than Andromeda, most of the people bashing Andromeda didn't even play it.
Andromeda isn't an unplayable buggy alpha mess and is actually a finished videogame. It wasn't great, but fuck it's nowhere near FO76.
the npcs didn't consent to be in this game so they blurred their faces
Science fantasy is the soft definition of sci-fi that contains element of fantasy such as (the list goes on):The science fantasy term is retarded. Sci-fi is when it is about the future and about tech,fantasy when it is in the past and about magic. ME games was all about that tech and had no magic in it.
I agree with your definition of Science Fantasy, but you gotta be kidding me.Other notable examples of Science Fantasy:
Star Trek
Star Trek is pure Sci-fi.
Now, before I posted that, I actually checked:I agree with your definition of Science Fantasy, but you gotta be kidding me.Other notable examples of Science Fantasy:
Star Trek
Star Trek is pure Sci-fi. Yes, it has elements of gods, ascendant beings, telepathy, etc. But none of them are written off as "space magic", instead all of these are either higher technologies humans simply do not yet understand or evolution based.
There's nothing "magical" in Star Trek, everything has a scientific explanation (which is merely unknown to the protagonists).
Hell, even the Prophets in DS9 are not described as gods by anyone except most Bajorans, they are simply higher beings existing in non-linear time (which makes their words appear prophetic to others).
I think it is important to make a difference not only IF certain elements appear, but also how they are described/explained.
If you take something like Shadowrun, it is clearly sci-fi + fantasy, because its magical elements aren't "explained away". Magic is magic and that's about it, it's not a kind of evolution or technology not yet understood, but a thing of its own.
While Star Trek goes out of its way NOT to have anything be explained as magic.
The Star Trek franchise created by Gene Roddenberry is sometimes cited as an example of science fantasy. Writer James F. Broderick describes Star Trek as science fantasy because it includes semi-futuristic as well as supernatural/fantasy elements such as The Q.[6] According to the late iconic science fiction author, Arthur C. Clarke, many purists argue that Star Trek is science fantasy rather than science fiction because of its scientifically improbable elements, which he partially agreed with.[7]