Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Aod News Main Thread

Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
4,334
I didn't secretly hope to sell 200-300,000 copies (what are the odds of that?) much like I don't secretly hope that the dungeon crawler does *really* well but in case it does we can take one of the endings (you'll know which one when you get there and you're going to love it) and make another crawler. Maybe even hire a couple of extra people.

How many sells it has to make for you to make a sequel?
 

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,044
Well, had AoD sold 200-300k copies (not that anyone on the dev team expected it), we would have made a sequel. Not because it takes that much money but because it would have meant an overwhelmingly positive response that would simply demand another game in that setting (and even if it sells half of what AoD sold, it would still be ok).

DR - same story. Right now all possibilities are on the table. It can fail (as it doesn't have the aspects that many people liked about AoD), it can do ok (as we hope), or it can do surprisingly well, creating a strong demand for a sequel based on a certain ending. Naturally, we can't drop the CSG and start pumping out dungeon crawlers, so we'll have to expand the team to be able to do both. Expanding team is both risky and expensive, hence the need to do really, really well. How much? It's hard to say at this point as this game will be much cheaper (under $10), so it will require a much higher volume to add something to both the CSG budget and the budget to expand the team.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
4,334
Well, had AoD sold 200-300k copies (not that anyone on the dev team expected it), we would have made a sequel. Not because it takes that much money but because it would have meant an overwhelmingly positive response that would simply demand another game in that setting (and even if it sells half of what AoD sold, it would still be ok).

Give it 5-7 years. Game is already a cult classic, and cult classics tend to gather new fans slowly, but steadily. Like a slow motion avalanche.
 

Slimu

Augur
Patron
Joined
Sep 26, 2011
Messages
169
Divinity: Original Sin 2 Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Well, had AoD sold 200-300k copies (not that anyone on the dev team expected it), we would have made a sequel. Not because it takes that much money but because it would have meant an overwhelmingly positive response that would simply demand another game in that setting (and even if it sells half of what AoD sold, it would still be ok).

DR - same story. Right now all possibilities are on the table. It can fail (as it doesn't have the aspects that many people liked about AoD), it can do ok (as we hope), or it can do surprisingly well, creating a strong demand for a sequel based on a certain ending. Naturally, we can't drop the CSG and start pumping out dungeon crawlers, so we'll have to expand the team to be able to do both. Expanding team is both risky and expensive, hence the need to do really, really well. How much? It's hard to say at this point as this game will be much cheaper (under $10), so it will require a much higher volume to add something to both the CSG budget and the budget to expand the team.

The game will cost under 10$? The price seems very low. I think that at least 10$ is a good price if the combat is good (based on AoD combat, I'm expecting it to be very satisfying).
How long would it take to finish it?
 

HoboForEternity

LIBERAL PROPAGANDIST
Patron
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
9,419
Location
liberal utopia in progress
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Well, had AoD sold 200-300k copies (not that anyone on the dev team expected it), we would have made a sequel. Not because it takes that much money but because it would have meant an overwhelmingly positive response that would simply demand another game in that setting (and even if it sells half of what AoD sold, it would still be ok).

Give it 5-7 years. Game is already a cult classic, and cult classics tend to gather new fans slowly, but steadily. Like a slow motion avalanche.
Yeah, after all torment was performing underwhelmingly when it released. Now even some mainstream gaming media recognize it.

I myself found out about it in 2011, and it became my entry to the genre as a whole.
 

Elhoim

Iron Tower Studio
Developer
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Messages
2,880
Location
San Isidro, Argentina
The game will cost under 10$? The price seems very low. I think that at least 10$ is a good price if the combat is good (based on AoD combat, I'm expecting it to be very satisfying).
How long would it take to finish it?

Around 10 hours, depending on many factors, of course. There are 50 fights, plus dialogues, exploration, looting, crafting... Dying and reloading again, and again, and again...
 

Zanzoken

Arcane
Joined
Dec 16, 2014
Messages
4,064
Also, wasn't the maximum party size going to allow five characters (like the CSG) or did I misread? The linked post seems to talk about the number of recruitable companions, since the game is supposed to let you have a group of two at least (unless I'm misremembering that as well).
We reduced to 4 fairly early for balance reasons.

Do you care to expand on this a little bit? I figure 4-man parties got popular when RPGs started being blockbuster multi-platform releases, but I know that's not why you guys are doing it.
 

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,044
The more people you have in your party, the more enemies we have to throw at you to maintain challenge. It works better in RT games like BG/IWD where you can kill a bunch of enemies fast, but doesn't work as well in a TB game with a relatively slow-paced combat (you don't kill anyone in 1-2 hits). Plus, in most crawlers you're meant to have a full party and losing most people isn't someone a player would accept. This game is designed differently, so you'll lose party members left and right, which means that you might go alone against enemies designed against 6 people. They will slaughter you before you can do anything. So we assume that you'll have 2-3 people, which is a more manageable range than 2-6.

For the record, not all crawlers had 6-8 people. Dungeon Master and Lands of Lore had 4 and 3, iirc.
 

Goral

Arcane
Patron
The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
3,570
Location
Poland
Biggest Polish gaming site has covered the Dungeon Rats news: http://www.gry-online.pl/S013.asp?ID=100332

I'm surprised how detailed it is considering that GOL is a Polish equivalent of IGN. Besides Dungeon Rats info that's available on Steam page, they mention that Iron Tower is responsible for unpolished but very abundant/vast game that has many fans. They also mention Colony Ship Game.

Also, vote for DR at GOG: https://af.gog.com/wishlist/games/dungeon_rats?as=1649904300

P.S.
Should we create a separate thread for DR or do we dump all news here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

HoboForEternity

LIBERAL PROPAGANDIST
Patron
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
9,419
Location
liberal utopia in progress
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Birthday%2BCake.jpg


:3
 

Aenra

Guest
Regarding the dungeon crawler, i'd have to be honest and say i'd be surprised if it did well (and by well i mean not merely perform its task, cover your in between expanses, but do like proper well, ie on its own right). That's my personal perspective influencing judgement of course; am so out of touch with what's hip or not today, may well be wrong. Sure hope so.
But the big one? I think it can do better than AoD. Not as.. demanding, mentally (less focus on reading) and assuming i comprehend the whole Charisma system? A lot more flexible, should be able to satisfy both group and solo lovers which i'd consider a huge plus. You combine the two with the nu-graphics, yeah, should do well :)
 

agris

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
6,927
Expanding team is both risky and expensive, hence the need to do really, really well. How much? It's hard to say at this point as this game will be much cheaper (under $10), so it will require a much higher volume to add something to both the CSG budget and the budget to expand the team.

I think the sub-$10 price point is smart. Volume can more than make up for thin margins, as Walmart and others can attest to. I hope it works out, I'll be D1P'ing Dungeon Rats.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom