Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Early Access Thread [GAME RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

[Storyfag]

There would be riots on the streets if Wizards are allowed to learn divine spells.

You alone standing in the street with a cardboard sign doesn't make it a riot.

 

[ERYFKRAD]

they can wear anything.

They could wear anything, but instead they choose dresses.

 

[The_Mask]

The difference between a dress and a robe. Discuss.

 

[jackofshadows]

Who is more gay: priest in his dress or barbarian in his skimpy outfit?

 

[Cryomancer]

are gay

Rusty logic :
- Spend the entire day in a all male monastery kneeling = straight.
- Spend the day conjuring succubi and doing orgies = gay

And priests can use robes too.

The difference between a dress and a robe. Discuss.

That is too complex for a brainlet.

 

[rusty_shackleford]

are gay

Rusty logic :
- Spend the entire day in a all male monastery kneeling = straight.
- Spend the day conjuring succubi and doing orgies = gay

And priests can use robes too.

The difference between a dress and a robe. Discuss.

That is too complex for a brainlet.

can't think of anything gayer than needing to bring a succubus along with you wherever you go to prove you're really not gay *wink wink nudge nudge*

 

[Nortar]

dresses are gay lol

 

[Nano]

Through the wonders of modding you don't have to put up with dresses on your Mages. Always give them normal clothes, including pants. Not to mention the increasing number of RPGs that don't force Mages to wear robes to begin with.

 

[Lacrymas]

Not to mention the increasing number of RPGs that don't force Mages to wear robes to begin with.

We call those betrayers and blasphemers.

 

[hell bovine]

Through the wonders of modding you don't have to put up with dresses on your Mages. Always give them normal clothes, including pants. Not to mention the increasing number of RPGs that don't force Mages to wear robes to begin with.

You don't need mods. This edition has no arcane failure as long as the wizard has armor proficiency. Shield dwarf or githaynki mage will start out with medium proficiency, for example.

 

[Nano]

You don't need mods. This edition has no arcane failure as long as the wizard has armor proficiency.

Lmao, fuck wasting a proficiency slot on that. Besides, I said normal clothes, not armor. You don't need proficiency for that, right?

 

[Yosharian]

wizards wear dresses(mega gay) whereas clerics wear medium/heavy armor and shields(based)

By this logic, a wizard who wears armor is based

Welcome to 5E btw, where, coincidentally, wizards can equip armor simply by taking a level in Fighter (or Cleric for that matter)

 

[Delterius]

Through the wonders of modding you don't have to put up with dresses on your Mages. Always give them normal clothes, including pants. Not to mention the increasing number of RPGs that don't force Mages to wear robes to begin with.

i'll just wear pants under my robes

 

[rusty_shackleford]

wizards wear dresses(mega gay) whereas clerics wear medium/heavy armor and shields(based)

By this logic, a wizard who wears armor is based

Welcome to 5E btw, where, coincidentally, wizards can equip armor simply by taking a level in Fighter (or Cleric for that matter)

nah

 

[hell bovine]

You don't need mods. This edition has no arcane failure as long as the wizard has armor proficiency.

Lmao, fuck wasting a proficiency slot on that. Besides, I said normal clothes, not armor. You don't need proficiency for that, right?

You don't waste anything, they (gith and dwarves) get this on character creation. Level 4 is where characters can choose proficiencies.

 

[Nano]

(gith and dwarves)

Gross.

 

[Mortmal]

wizards wear dresses(mega gay) whereas clerics wear medium/heavy armor and shields(based)

By this logic, a wizard who wears armor is based

Welcome to 5E btw, where, coincidentally, wizards can equip armor simply by taking a level in Fighter (or Cleric for that matter)

As wizard its indeed a good idea to pick one level of cleric, you get the plate armor proficiency , and you can still use cleric level 1 spells in higher spell slots.

 

[Cryomancer]

can't think of anything gayer than needing to bring a succubus along with you wherever you go to prove you're really not gay *wink wink nudge nudge*

Easy. Kneeing and worshiping a deity in a all male monastery cuz you are worthless without his power.

But why do you have a strong conviction about the homossexuality of a wizard? Did some wizard used dominate spells on you and made you his sexual slave?

As wizard its indeed a good idea to pick one level of cleric, you get the plate armor proficiency , and you can still use cleric level 1 spells in higher spell slots.

IMO the player needs a story reason to multiclass. Multiclassing only to make a pun pun build is silly.

 

[Mortmal]

can't think of anything gayer than needing to bring a succubus along with you wherever you go to prove you're really not gay *wink wink nudge nudge*

Easy. Kneeing and worshiping a deity in a all male monastery cuz you are worthless without his power.

But why do you have a strong conviction about the homossexuality of a wizard? Did some wizard used dominate spells on you and made you his sexual slave?

As wizard its indeed a good idea to pick one level of cleric, you get the plate armor proficiency , and you can still use cleric level 1 spells in higher spell slots.

IMO the player needs a story reason to multiclass. Multiclassing only to make a pun pun build is silly.

Multiclassing in 5E completely break the game, but for efficiency you have to. It's extremely easy to find a good roleplay reason to mix cleric and wizard.

 

[Desiderius]

Through the wonders of modding you don't have to put up with dresses on your Mages. Always give them normal clothes, including pants. Not to mention the increasing number of RPGs that don't force Mages to wear robes to begin with.

i'll just wear pants under my robes

Commando is the only way to go.

 

[Gargaune]

Yes, that's why we have early access. To find them. It's Larian's (or Owlcat's) job to fix them when we do.

It's not the timeline that concerns me, but the general approach. Larian are outright rejecting all the feedback on their atrocious control scheme, and Swen jokes about deliberately leaving bugs in if he thinks they make the game funnier. I still believe they'll fix the Wizard's learning feature, but it's disconcerting that we're at a point we could speculate they might just leave it in.

imagine complaining about an obvious bug in an unfinished game

I used to think there's no way this won't get patched out, but now I'm not so sure.

 

[Larianshill]

I'm not sure they'll patch it either. It was there from day 1. The fact that it's still not fixed is worrying.

 

[Desiderius]

Alright, picking up a new system so I can play this bad boy.

 

[Efe]

afaik gpu scarcity is of all-time high lately
dont get ripped off

 

[Desiderius]

Buying used. Repair shop nerd just spent 20 minutes going over the options.

These are my people. I can trust him.