counterpoint
Here is my poorly made memeto trigger Larian cultists.
Which game? I would wager on both.counterpoint
Here is my poorly made memeto trigger Larian cultists.
The cast of NPCs is utter shit. Niggers, mongrels, stronk womyn, stronk nigger mongrel women.
It is a fucking crusade,mate. That is all i need from a game,have been waiting for that shit for 30 years now! Don't care if the VA cast is all wheelchair racers. I care for the story and the gameplay. Of which i don't know if it is good or not,because it is not out. I do have high expectation from the game since they did the first one very well. I don't mind sjw cunts in the game as long as i get to kill them,which the first game let me. It let me be an ars and do as i see fit. Tho in that aspect bg3 too lets me kill shit i dislike. When they come out i will play them if God willz it,and i will write a fast review in fanta fashion. I won't hold back if i dislike it .Wrath is actually worse as it stands. And knowing Owlcat most of those companions are gonna be built like shit as well.
Wrath is actually worse as it stands. And knowing Owlcat most of those companions are gonna be built like shit as well.
The amount of points was never the problem it was their retarded distribution and the choices for subclasses.
Owlcat optimized their encounters for rollplaying and gave you characters statted for role-playing.
The amount of points was never the problem it was their retarded distribution and the choices for subclasses.
Owlcat optimized their encounters for rollplaying and gave you characters statted for role-playing.
Nice journotake, dimwit. I spent the last two years proving this theory dead wrong (after starting out assuming it must be true!), and if you'd bothered to play the game you'd have no doubt discovered the same for yourself.
Stop beclowning yourself by spouting off about shit you know nothing about in the wrong forum for the topic.
Unlike you I finished the game only twice because I'm not an insufferable autist and have other interests so please excuse my lack of in depth autism.
Here is my poorly made memeto trigger Larian cultists.
Unlike you I finished the game only twice because I'm not an insufferable autist and have other interests so please excuse my lack of in depth autism.
Twice more than I did. I did test out the builds the companions started with and several combinations each because the game is highly replayable. The Day One journotards were wrong. Simple as. Starting stats don't matter much because items and abilities dwarf them and Paizo does a good job making nearly every archetype good at something and the ones Owlcat chose fit well with the setting. No dishonor being wrong. Correct your bad take and carry on.
Pillars is old hat, now every thread is a Pathfinder thread.tranny lovers go back to your tranny topics
"To be fair, those ratings are reviews of the game when it was released by its developers"То be fair, those ratings are probably from the start of the game when it was bugged up the butt.
Wrestling is just not effective without good commentator. And good voice actors are very rare.the idea that monks are the masters at unarmed combat is something that only exists in video game adaptations because they never implement grappling/wrestling
Lol. Literally "who carss"PF:WoTR :
- - Has lichdoom
- - Has other mythic paths (Dragon, Swarm who talks, Demon, etc)
- - Has Arueshalae
- - Has Nocticula
- - Has a amazing HoMM3 crusade system
- - Hundreds if not thousands of cool spells
- - Lv cap? 20/10 mythic
- - Glorious PF1e ruleset.
- (...)
Wtf, i love bg3 now! Victor, how much Larian paid you?