Hi, coming back after a 1 year hiatus to remind every WOTR faggot that you have no business evaluating good companion writing, notwithstanding the high probability of the writing being an absolute cringe-fest in this game as well.
Except that nobody likes WoTR due the companions, writing or anything like that. People like WoTR due the insane amount of options to build your char and power fantasy. According to Lacrymas, WoTR is the worst adventure path and I wish that OwlCAt will adapt rise of the runelords next. A AP all about fighting ancient tyrannical ultra specialized high level Wizard-kings.
But why people keep bringing WoTR in this thread? I get that BG3 lacks any content to discuss and looks more like someone modded 5E rules into DOS2 than a proper BG sequel(Black Geyser which isn't D&D looks more BGish than this game).
But a question. Is truth that Swen is considering changing to AEDU system from 4E? That he said that spell slots aren't intuitive and that he is considering AEDU( A = At-Will, E = Encounter, D = Daily, U = Utility)??? 4E is so awful that even 5E looks good in comparison. Is an attempt to bring the WoW decline which killed the ideas of game mechanics being in line with lore and transformed rpgs into mindless low lethality gear farming cooldown managing with no immersion into tabletop. And now PF2e is copying that decline.