Yeah, I hate dipping. It looks wrong to me. The Owlcat Pathfinder games seem to encourage it and it looks really jank.There is a lot of decline in the name of 'choice' over the editions. Racial ASI not being locked, no minimum stats for multiclassing, all races can be all classes etc.I wish we could return to the glory days of AD&D 2nd endition, when mulitclassing was rarely a good idea, Elves were still Elves, only Humans could be Paladins and all Paladins looked like dorks in the artwork.
Yeah, fuck the modern concept of choice. "Choice" should be about having your pick among meaningful alternatives and and not "I want to be whatever I choose in whatever way I choose to". Everything DnD has become flavourless slop. I like 5E in terms of game mechanics but everything else is pretty much fucking decline.
There is so much I dislike about modern DnD (by which I mean 3E and newer). The fucking multiclassing. "Dipping" levels into classes to munchkin some overpowered abomination. The all races can be everything shit. Race is basically a "skin" now.
There is other stuff.
Why the fuck are Dragonborn a thing? They were ramrodded into the game with 4E, never made any sense and they even had to come up with stupid shit to insert them into existing campaign settings.
Why are Drow a playable race? I mean, I now why - because there a million of tards who want to rolepay Drizzt Do'Urden. I just don't see how having such a race as a playable standard race next to High Elves and Humans is a good idea.
Or Half-Orcs? Where did those fuckers come from? Who mates with Orcs? Id' rather fuck a bear, tbh. At least bears don't reek of vodka. Or are Half-Orcs all the offspring of rape victims?
It was so weirdly described that I have no fucking idea if that's what they meant.Multiclass changes do look kind of weird, if I understood them correctly. Trading off raw power for flexibility is the whole point of it, but now it seems that you can just become gigawizard/sorcerer/cleric with level 6 spells for 3 classes all at once (even if for just one- it’s too strong)? Unless I missed some drawback they mentioned?
well I realize how it soundsWhat the fuck? I've boasted about my PC and I never got a free copySome of us had this game gifted to them after boasting about their new PC and feel therefore obliged to play it
There's a lesson here I suppose
I've been alternately criticizing and praising this game for almost three years at this point, but admittedly this last injection of details is the one that broke the camel's back, as saying goes.I was clinging on to a sliver of hope that the companion respeccing would be limited to just re-allocating stats, but it seems they just straight up let you swap their class as well. This coupled with the questionable decisions they've made in regards to multiclassing really makes it seem like they just want everyone to be a hybrid spellblade like in DOS. What a shame honestly
so they got polearm proficiency and increased carry weight as racial bonuses? lol they were already trash in 5e what is cuckswen thinkingYou thought humans were shit?
not anymore its metaslave choice
because humans are obviously stronger than dragons and orcs
at the very least extra attack was confirmed.So, what is everyone rolling for class?
I'm a gish-kindda guy, so Hexblade would be the obvious choice. But since long resting seems free and they're not implementing Hexblade, I dunno, really. I might do a bard instead, they can be cool gishes in 5E and I never play them.
On the other hand, Codex is the opposite, so the balance of the force has not been disturbedhttps://www.reddit.com/r/BaldursGat..._tadbole_power_progression_makes_no_sense_rp/
The community seems to be supportive of every Larian decision no matter what they do. It's extremely irritating to see them rationalize everything as if Larian is incapable of making dumbfuck decisions, like this one on the tadpole powers obviously is.
That's just the subreddit. Which is highly a self-selected group who "bullied" and downvoted away any sort of critical voice.The community seems to be supportive of every Larian decision no matter what they do. It's extremely irritating to see them rationalize everything as if Larian is incapable of making dumbfuck decisions, like this one on the tadpole powers obviously is.
I posted an interview a couple of pages back of an Italian interview, which implied that the Pact of the Blade is being made into Hexblade-lite.So, what is everyone rolling for class?
I'm a gish-kindda guy, so Hexblade would be the obvious choice. But since long resting seems free and they're not implementing Hexblade, I dunno, really. I might do a bard instead, they can be cool gishes in 5E and I never play them.
Yeah, I don't really see how humans are anything but objectively the worst race in BG3? If we had variant human with extra feat that would be another story, but all other races can pick any combination of +2/+1 based on class alone.so they got polearm proficiency and increased carry weight as racial bonuses? lol they were already trash in 5e what is cuckswen thinkingYou thought humans were shit?
not anymore its metaslave choice
because humans are obviously stronger than dragons and orcs
To be honest, I would take this interview with a grain of salt. It's possible something went wrong with the translation, it wouldn't be the first time.I posted an interview a couple of pages back of an Italian interview, which implied that the Pact of the Blade is being made into Hexblade-lite.So, what is everyone rolling for class?
I'm a gish-kindda guy, so Hexblade would be the obvious choice. But since long resting seems free and they're not implementing Hexblade, I dunno, really. I might do a bard instead, they can be cool gishes in 5E and I never play them.
I read the full thing in Italian and if there's something wrong with the translation it happened before the article was even published, because what they say is extremely clear.To be honest, I would take this interview with a grain of salt. It's possible something went wrong with the translation, it wouldn't be the first time.
I think codex is pretty fair in its analysis because there is no codex bandwagon. You can clearly see in this thread that for as many people only shitting on everything larian does, there's also a bunch of people clearly excited about the game.On the other hand, Codex is the opposite, so the balance of the force has not been disturbedhttps://www.reddit.com/r/BaldursGat..._tadbole_power_progression_makes_no_sense_rp/
The community seems to be supportive of every Larian decision no matter what they do. It's extremely irritating to see them rationalize everything as if Larian is incapable of making dumbfuck decisions, like this one on the tadpole powers obviously is.
I've always liked Larian's quest design and their games' general freeform way of letting you approach quests in more ways than most other contemporary RPGs allow you to. In both D:OS2 and BG3's early access version they've definitely also become better at anticipating various ways players might resolve whichever dilemmas they face. It might not be a lot but it's really what makes their games stand out to me because it shows that whatever random dumb shit you've done to complete a quest gets acknowledged.I've been alternately criticizing and praising this game for almost three years at this point, but admittedly this last injection of details is the one that broke the camel's back, as saying goes.I was clinging on to a sliver of hope that the companion respeccing would be limited to just re-allocating stats, but it seems they just straight up let you swap their class as well. This coupled with the questionable decisions they've made in regards to multiclassing really makes it seem like they just want everyone to be a hybrid spellblade like in DOS. What a shame honestly
I'm now definitely on board with "Larian gameplay designers are inept and they couldn't come up with a well-thought and balanced idea if their lives depended on it".
Almost every single bit of "homebrew" they injected in the game so far has been something bordering retardation and most of the "gameplay improvements" they implemented in 3 years of EA consisted in... Reverting some of their worst decisions and sticking closer to the source material, which is not really something they can take much credit for.
That's fair, although the image I edited my post with does seem consistent with the interview.To be honest, I would take this interview with a grain of salt. It's possible something went wrong with the translation, it wouldn't be the first time.I posted an interview a couple of pages back of an Italian interview, which implied that the Pact of the Blade is being made into Hexblade-lite.
this is quite interesting so its not just cha but could make it wisdom too or something with clericI posted an interview a couple of pages back of an Italian interview, which implied that the Pact of the Blade is being made into Hexblade-lite.So, what is everyone rolling for class?
I'm a gish-kindda guy, so Hexblade would be the obvious choice. But since long resting seems free and they're not implementing Hexblade, I dunno, really. I might do a bard instead, they can be cool gishes in 5E and I never play them.
Found this on reddit:
I posted an interview a couple of pages back of an Italian interview, which implied that the Pact of the Blade is being made into Hexblade-lite.So, what is everyone rolling for class?
I'm a gish-kindda guy, so Hexblade would be the obvious choice. But since long resting seems free and they're not implementing Hexblade, I dunno, really. I might do a bard instead, they can be cool gishes in 5E and I never play them.
Found this on reddit: