Swen
Scholar
I'm okay with that, I support the poor and homeless!Couldn't have been me because I wouldn't pay money for your crap.So, who of you posted this review?
I'm okay with that, I support the poor and homeless!Couldn't have been me because I wouldn't pay money for your crap.So, who of you posted this review?
From each according to their ability to each according to their need, right fellow traveller?I'm okay with that, I support the poor and homeless!Couldn't have been me because I wouldn't pay money for your crap.So, who of you posted this review?
I guess your Nippon localization sucked.Deserved higher score, glorious nippon failed me
Keep deluding yourself about that broski.Everyone will forget this game exists before the movie comes out.
This is a really stupid take even for you.Everyone will forget this game exists before the movie comes out.
People do that with all games and they still manageto have an everlasting impression with society as a wholeI am quite the dumb-dumb, that's true, but I don't think it is. BG3 doesn't have staying power, either gameplay-wise or story-wise. Most people will play through it, probably quit in the beginning of act 3, and never think about it again.
which is definitely unimpressive. they merely buckled the conventional thinking of the past 20 years.It did, however, get the message across that turn-based RPGs/games sell.
The game certainly doesn't have over 150,000 players on Steam almost half a year after its release.I am quite the dumb-dumb, that's true, but I don't think it is. BG3 doesn't have staying power, either gameplay-wise or story-wise. Most people will play through it, probably quit in the beginning of act 3, and never think about it again.
The whole "class/race matters thing" was just another Belgian lie.I really don't like the Bioware/Obsidian speech check presentation like in most games. Fallout 1 did speech checks right. It didn't advertise them nor did it tell you what numbers you had to roll. You had to deduce where the checks were and either you succeeded or you didn't. And then Arcanum was even better. In Arcanum, other characters recognized my character at least as a Gnome though making some antinanatic remarks without me needing to choose any dialogue options! BG3 doesn't really do anything along those lines consistently and I notice nothing close to the quality of Arcanum in that regard when I played this. Not only that, BG3 doesn't really have Gnomes or Dwarves. Just halflings pretending to be them by making some retarded version of a mechanical golem and there are no Turnip plantations to be found anywhere! How can you have Gnomes without Turnip plantations? Plus real Gnomes would have never have had their families captured and held hostage since they would be protected by an army of well trained and loyal half-ogre bodyguards. Real Gnomes would built much better robots than those walking trashcans those halfling LARPers built.
When have sales corresponded to quality ever?which is definitely unimpressive. they merely buckled the conventional thinking of the past 20 years.It did, however, get the message across that turn-based RPGs/games sell.
lacrymas do you know the saying about the one eyed king. you're being the reverse of that
When Kingdom Come Deliverance sold millions.When have sales corresponded to quality ever?which is definitely unimpressive. they merely buckled the conventional thinking of the past 20 years.It did, however, get the message across that turn-based RPGs/games sell.
lacrymas do you know the saying about the one eyed king. you're being the reverse of that
Is not selling a pre-requisite for quality?When have sales corresponded to quality ever?which is definitely unimpressive. they merely buckled the conventional thinking of the past 20 years.It did, however, get the message across that turn-based RPGs/games sell.
lacrymas do you know the saying about the one eyed king. you're being the reverse of that
He took a long time to reach Act 3, I see.
I think they'll quit way before Act 3 and have a decent impression of it.I am quite the dumb-dumb, that's true, but I don't think it is. BG3 doesn't have staying power, either gameplay-wise or story-wise. Most people will play through it, probably quit in the beginning of act 3, and never think about it again.
Yeap, that's true. I also didn't expect the D:OS (2) reaction and sales. However, my opinion is still that Larian's recent offerings aren't very good games and are painfully average. Marvel films are painfully average too, but they are much more popular than Larian's games. Popularity =/= quality. It's telling that you yourself are trying to convince me of BG3's virtues without naming anything that the game itself does extraordinarily well.Is not selling a pre-requisite for quality?
Through sheer C&C and reiteration, a series of games have broken through the ceiling and put forward a game genre which, until very recently, was notoriously unpopular. Or expected to be unpopular. That is not just BG3 but also the story of D:OS. BG3 is the culimination of that story. And I think it's rather self evident that people are grasping at straws to pretend that the game is somehow bad and forgetful. But we all know Sven is gonna live rent free in the hands of people from BioWare to Bethesda to this very thread for years to come.
A bold prediction? Don't really think so. Even the most hopeful advocates of TB RPGs didn't expect the D:OS success years ago, much less this insanity. And it is not unearned. Within a week of launch, we already had articles claiming that BG3 cannot be the standard of RPGs. And those articles are right. Very few development teams could put this much effort into reiteration. If anything, I think that's the greater impediment to BG3's influence on game development going forward.
It's got the best take on 5E so far.Yeap, that's true. I also didn't expect the D:OS (2) reaction and sales. However, my opinion is still that Larian's recent offerings aren't very good games and are painfully average. Marvel films are painfully average too, but they are much more popular than Larian's games. Popularity =/= quality. It's telling that you yourself are trying to convince me of BG3's virtues without naming anything that the game itself does extraordinarily well.Is not selling a pre-requisite for quality?
Through sheer C&C and reiteration, a series of games have broken through the ceiling and put forward a game genre which, until very recently, was notoriously unpopular. Or expected to be unpopular. That is not just BG3 but also the story of D:OS. BG3 is the culimination of that story. And I think it's rather self evident that people are grasping at straws to pretend that the game is somehow bad and forgetful. But we all know Sven is gonna live rent free in the hands of people from BioWare to Bethesda to this very thread for years to come.
A bold prediction? Don't really think so. Even the most hopeful advocates of TB RPGs didn't expect the D:OS success years ago, much less this insanity. And it is not unearned. Within a week of launch, we already had articles claiming that BG3 cannot be the standard of RPGs. And those articles are right. Very few development teams could put this much effort into reiteration. If anything, I think that's the greater impediment to BG3's influence on game development going forward.