NSFW Best Thread Ever [No SJW-related posts allowed]

[KreideBein]

neither of you had the balls to leave the thread. you were a moderator for fuck's sake. you both have big egos and need to swallow your fucking pride

That's pretty much what I just said. I eventually left the thread, but I did it about three pages too late. Again, in retrospect, I should have just closed the damn thing right after things started going down the shitter and cleaned up the off topic posts. Letting go on for so long was a serious mistake, I won't deny that.

 

[ya...]

there. now come the hell back

 

[KreideBein]

Again: I left because Grum was shitting on the forums because he didn't like me. Thus, it was in the best interest of the board for me to leave. If Grum stops polluting the board with his bile directed towards me, I'll come back. If he's just going to keep it up, I'll stay away. Since you're on TS a lot, why don't you talk to him and see if he's cooled down?

 

[ya...]

he rarely posts to begin with. he simply used that thread as an opportunity to vent his hate for you, and you let him. he never mentions you on ts or tc. i 100% guarantee you that if you posted again as is, grum would leave you alone. i know the guy well enough to know that

 

[Fez]

Drama! Either get divorced or kiss and make up.

 

[KreideBein]

We could bring you in for a threesome.

 

[Fez]

I think Naked_Lunch would be upset if he didn't get first refusal.

 

[KreideBein]

Well, at least there's always Blackheart to fall back on.

 

[Fez]

There's always Blackheart to fall back on.

 

[Admiral Rimjob POOBUM]

Grummy likes "brutally murdering Codexer faggots", remember. We're all too scared to go over there in case he kills us with his massive e-penis.

 

[KreideBein]

Considering all of the recent gender confusion, it's probably a massive e-strap-on.

 

[Texas Red]

KreideBein, Pete wont have you anyway. By browsing forums outside of the utopic ESF you became influenced by their barberic ways.

 

[Vipera]

Then what the fuck have you been doing these past few pages?

It was vaguely entertaining, and there was still the faint possibility that you weren't a complete dumbfuck.

I wouldn't give up quite yet.

I forgot you were so up to date on my informal education. Despite lacking any formal schooling on the subject, I do know something about it.

I don't need to know the specifics of your informal education to know that your understanding of sociology is at best inadequate.

Explain to me how my understanding is inadequate, please.

The real irony of that statement is how relative it is.

It wasn't a relativistic statement you dipshit. Whether you've successfully argued your point or not is a binary function. You either have or you haven't. In this case, you haven't.

What the fuck? How is that not relativistic? Everyone who's seen this thread has told me I'm more or less fighting my corner.

Or is it the giant spaghetti monster that determines what is or is not a good argument?

It is also designed to make Vipera horny. Notice the dolphin.

Yes folks, it really is that easy.

EDIT: I can't play with you guys anymore this morning, I have to leave for teh school. Maybe I'll come back as less of a dumbfuck so KB and I can argue!

 

[VenomByte]

Oh my god:

http://www.elderscrolls.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=626228

"oblivion felt to me like the adult version of gothic 3. really"

 

[Admiral Rimjob POOBUM]

Please tell me that's a troll.

 

[Kingston]

but gothic 3 just kept me from playing last time I did because I had no clue where to go; no idea what indicates the current location I should go to (got a quest like talk to the rebel leader). I know the name of a city yet I can't find it on the map. lol.

By the Gods! They forgot to give you the magical compass of pointing-where-to-go-so-you-don't-need-to-do-anything-yourself!! No wonder the game sucks, huh?

 

[JarlFrank]

but gothic 3 just kept me from playing last time I did because I had no clue where to go; no idea what indicates the current location I should go to (got a quest like talk to the rebel leader). I know the name of a city yet I can't find it on the map. lol.

By the Gods! They forgot to give you the magical compass of pointing-where-to-go-so-you-don't-need-to-do-anything-yourself!! No wonder the game sucks, huh?

I want to kill him. Now.

 

[Texas Red]

Please tell me that's a troll.

No, Admiral. That is the manifistation of Bethesda's target audiance.

 

[Fez]

I hope VD is taking notes on all this so he can make an AWESOME game for the market.

 

[Kingston]

I hope VD is taking notes on all this so he can make an AWESOME game for the market.

HOPEFULY ITLL GET NEXT GEN GRAFIX ASWELL LOL AND FYSICKS! ALSO STUFF LIEK SCALED DIFFICULTEE SO IT WONT B 2 HARD U NO`?

 

[TheGreatGodPan]

Objective morality (though not actually Objectivism) taken to ridiculous lengths here. Another smart person who put way too much thought into near incomprehensible nonsense.

 

[KreideBein]

Explain to me how my understanding is inadequate, please.

The fact that you apparently don't realize that deviancy such as what you're describing remaining a practice that is considered deviant is integral to the continuation of our society demonstrates that. I'm not going to go into any more detail than that, as I've got a 20 page policy paper to write and two tests to study for, and explaining basic sociological concepts to a perverted asshat on the Internet is not on the top of my list of things to do. Educate yourself on what you're arguing about before you try again.

What the fuck? How is that not relativistic? Everyone who's seen this thread has told me I'm more or less fighting my corner.

Or is it the giant spaghetti monster that determines what is or is not a good argument?

Whee, let's start throwing out the appeal to popularity fallacy and hope that that legitimizes our argument.

Objective morality (though not actually Objectivism) taken to ridiculous lengths here. Another smart person who put way too much thought into near incomprehensible nonsense.

It's things like that that convinced me to take a ethical pluralist point of view. Extreme moral objectivism can be just as bad as extreme relativism.

 

[Data4]

In light of recent revelations, I think a new title should be added to the board. "Fishfucker" seems apropo, despite the semantic inaccuracy.

-D4

 

[Vipera]

What the fuck? How is that not relativistic? Everyone who's seen this thread has told me I'm more or less fighting my corner.

Or is it the giant spaghetti monster that determines what is or is not a good argument?

Whee, let's start throwing out the appeal to popularity fallacy and hope that that legitimizes our argument.

Then what does legitimize an argument?

Objective morality (though not actually Objectivism) taken to ridiculous lengths here. Another smart person who put way too much thought into near incomprehensible nonsense.

It's things like that that convinced me to take a ethical pluralist point of view. Extreme moral objectivism can be just as bad as extreme relativism.

I agree, which is why some things are inherently immoral. Namely those that cause harm.

 

[KreideBein]

Then what does legitimize an argument?

It being valid or cogent, depending on whether it's deductive or inductive.

I agree, which is why some things are inherently immoral. Namely those that cause harm.

We'll just have to accept disagreement on that point, but any sane person will realize how odious those kinds of deviancy for which you've espoused a fondness are.