[citation needed]I added [sup] and [sub] tags for superscript and subscript. note the use of the [plain] tag to output these two tags literally without invoking them.
sup DrogI added [sup] and [sub] tags for superscript and subscript. note the use of the [plain] tag to output these two tags literally without invoking them.
AidsAds?
It can be useful at rare occasions, bot more often than not, it feels like an annoyance.I disabled the search suggestion popup. Does anyone actually prefer having it enabled?
Why though?, I'm content with mineI've suggested before that everyone's ignore lists should get cleared once a year automatically. Either on Christmas or on new year's day. Is that even possible though? Seems like it would be an easy script to make.
Because it would cause massive amounts of butthurt. It would probably lower the amount of ignoring going on overall by a lot too. Lots of people here get butthurt and put someone on ignore then forget about it, even if it's someone who's normally a good poster. Ignore lists are for butthurt cucks.Why though?, I'm content with mineI've suggested before that everyone's ignore lists should get cleared once a year automatically. Either on Christmas or on new year's day. Is that even possible though? Seems like it would be an easy script to make.
Sir this is an RPG siteBecause it would cause massive amounts of butthurt
Because it would cause massive amounts of butthurt. It would probably lower the amount of ignoring going on overall by a lot too. Lots of people here get butthurt and put someone on ignore then forget about it, even if it's someone who's normally a good poster. Ignore lists are for butthurt cucks.Why though?, I'm content with mineI've suggested before that everyone's ignore lists should get cleared once a year automatically. Either on Christmas or on new year's day. Is that even possible though? Seems like it would be an easy script to make.
It's an XF2 performance optimization. Some things need to be taken into account when undoing it such as not displaying GD images outside of GD.This comment looks this way, on mobile. Clicking the link takes you to a new tab just with the image displayed. Ideally, it just displays correctly in the quote like a normal hotlinked image.
Are you sure what I’m suggesting would make such a drastic difference? Image and media embeds all display in quotes already, whether mobile or not. It’s just this one class of images, those uploaded directly to the forum, that behave like my image above. I have trouble understanding how switching them from “view attachment” to inline render would require the undoing of a host of foundational performance optimizations resulting in 75% worse performance of the forum as a whole.It's an XF2 performance optimization. Some things need to be taken into account when undoing it such as not displaying GD images outside of GD.This comment looks this way, on mobile. Clicking the link takes you to a new tab just with the image displayed. Ideally, it just displays correctly in the quote like a normal hotlinked image.
Generally the problem with images and quotes is that people don't trim them, not the opposite. So this would probably make the forum experience worse 75% of the time when viewing quotes of attached images.
I'll install an addon if you have one.I have trouble understanding how switching them from “view attachment” to inline render would require the undoing of a host of foundational performance optimizations resulting in 75% worse performance of the forum as a whole.
What’s the technical name for the feature by which we attach image files to posts?I'll install an addon if you have one.I have trouble understanding how switching them from “view attachment” to inline render would require the undoing of a host of foundational performance optimizations resulting in 75% worse performance of the forum as a whole.
No idea, but it's not implemented in:What’s the technical name for the feature by which we attach image files to posts?