Taking the city, renaming it Tzarevgrad Turksmellovo, and letting barbarians loot it for 1000 years.This looks really bad. I guess that was a given for a game that has got Bulgaria in it.
Taking the city, renaming it Tzarevgrad Turksmellovo, and letting barbarians loot it for 1000 years.This looks really bad. I guess that was a given for a game that has got Bulgaria in it.
lol this fucking thing has Denuvo.
t. Constantine VIThis looks really bad. I guess that was a given for a game that has got Bulgaria in it.
He's some albanian arab, trying to bring down us turkomen.t. Constantine VIThis looks really bad. I guess that was a given for a game that has got Bulgaria in it.
Platinum edition had 90% off sales all the time, and there were a few times when it was $5They were discounting only the base game, while Platinum Edition was very expensive, even on sales for years until they've introduced the "new leader pass" and all people who actually were playing the game got at least Platinum.
Taking the city, renaming it Tzarevgrad Turksmellovo, and letting barbarians loot it for 1000 years.This looks really bad. I guess that was a given for a game that has got Bulgaria in it.
Would've been very redpilled if we did that, but sadly what would've actually happened was all notable people and political power moving away from Bulgaria, all sorts of armenoids and grekoids being appointed ministers, and basically a very roundabout way of reviving the Byzantine empire rule over Bulgaria.That just sounds like what Bulgarians tried to do anyway, are you trying to sell me what you already wanted to do as a deal? Very thrifty.
You know, all these posts seem to be saying how much they love civ7? So here is 11 hours of its goodness:
they don't want common people to see for themselves how much this sucks before it's too late.lol this fucking thing has Denuvo.
Exactly my thoughts as well.they don't want common people to see for themselves how much this sucks before it's too late.lol this fucking thing has Denuvo.
Shamelessly ripping of chan:
>cannot ever switch tiles between cities
>score victory cannot be turned off, kinda mitigated by increasing age length
>all wars instantly end during an age transition, with your units sent out of enemy borders
>archipelago map gen looks more like small continents
>ai more willing to give away cities, even without being in war with you
>sieges are much easier: no city bombard, siege units more tankier, and avg gold income very high
>gamebreaking potential is massive: is easier than previous civ games
>mementos must be grinded to use for all leaders. Expect 100~ hours min to get all for one leader
>multiplayer: cannot start with more than 5 players when starting in the antiquity age
>mult. with advanced start will always spawn in major civs w/ ai
>ideology victory replaces domination victory
UI is a fucking mess
>inconsistent enemy highlighting - city-states/tribes are colored red while major civs aren't
>no map search to quickly find resources, natural wonders, etc.
>no on-map ui indicator for ageless buildings, have to memorize what is or check the prompt when queueing another building
>no civopedia page for civs' unique traditions (social policies), have to look at civ at game setup for info (in-game)
>can't rename cities or commanders
Positives
>variety of playstyles combining traditions, mementos n shiet. Modding potential is high (once tools are released...)
>quick/online speed more feasible, espec. w/ the ages system. Online takes around 4-5 hours, standard 10-15
>easiest civ to get into
how the times change. i remember the first ass creep, ubi leaked the gold which was in absolute shambles only to declare "don't worry, the full game is much better, it's not the final version". it was the final version.Exactly my thoughts as well.
I still can't get over how infinitely better Civ IV looks over this one.