Country_Gravy
Arcane
and to think EU4 is next with this
I think the reason for this DLC is balance concerns. The threat from the east are mongols, the threat from the south are arabs. France and stuff in the west can dwell and get fat uncontested.
Because vikings are already done for? Also, where are they supposed to come from? At least the aztecs have a proper empire. And in the end it doesn't matter whether aztecs or vikings but we need something to spoil the fun on the west coast.I think the reason for this DLC is balance concerns. The threat from the east are mongols, the threat from the south are arabs. France and stuff in the west can dwell and get fat uncontested.
Then why not reintroduce Vikings, at least that would make more sense.
Dont be ridiculous, this dlc makes no sense at all.
Hence alternate history. Lololololol.Yes, Aztecs didnt even have any ships or ship building capacity. Sending a man over the coast was beyond their ability, beyond the ocean? Please.
Yes, Aztecs didnt even have any ships or ship building capacity. Sending a man over the coast was beyond their ability, beyond the ocean? Please.
Nope. It is not.It's akin to saying "What if the Confederacy had the capacity to manufacture B-52 bombers?"
Nope. It is not.It's akin to saying "What if the Confederacy had the capacity to manufacture B-52 bombers?"
Europe of the time had no idea what was going on in the Americas. Why couldn't the Americas have had technological advances earlier than Europe? Hell, the Americas could be a massive cluster of small islands to motivate having hundreds of ships.
[1] So there is no way they could have colonized Northern America and hopped over Greenland?Actually it really is just that. Bear in mind that you are talking about setting up and pulling off a successful amphibious invasion of Europe that is based out of Mexico [1]. The nearest similarities for size and scope don't happen until WW2. There is no way anybody had the means to do this or could have had the means to pull it off at that time [2]. Hell even today that sort of undertaking would be a nightmare (loading up several hundred thousand troops, sailing half way around the world, and plopping them down into hostile territory on hostile beaches, with the nearest support base being back home) [1]. This is just silliness. Especially in this time period [2].Nope. It is not.It's akin to saying "What if the Confederacy had the capacity to manufacture B-52 bombers?"
Europe of the time had no idea what was going on in the Americas. Why couldn't the Americas have had technological advances earlier than Europe? Hell, the Americas could be a massive cluster of small islands to motivate having hundreds of ships.
Also it is important to bear in mind that the trip to the New World for Europeans for a very long time could take months. Now imagine trying to supply 200 thousand troops for a month at sea, and needing at least some supplies for when you arrive (after all you don't have any idea what is over there or what to expect). Your fleet would have to be absolutely massive to carry the necessary supplies to maintain your troops because going back and forth is not practical [3]. Yes you can live off the land to a degree, but there again, you don't know what is there and sending hundreds of thousands over all at once is an issue [4]. All that is just dealing with actually supplying the army and doesn't even touch on disease, which would be terrible on the boat ride over and on arrival [5].
It is funny and all, but it isn't to bring a "balance" for the west (basically Pdox is trolling the EU4 folks who have been moaning over how natives need to be not shit in EU4, and Pdox making some easy money on the side.)
TLDR: It is utterly retarded and trying to pass it off as "alt-history" is lame. Sure it might be good for a laugh, but it makes my brain hurt if I try to actually think it out. Will pass on, unless I have extra bluecoins about (because it is would be pretty R00Fles!! lulzy to watch the Aztecs and Mongols conquer Europe).
[1] So there is no way they could have colonized Northern America and hopped over Greenland?
[2] At the time is a strictly historical term, not alternative history.
[3] The Americas are big. They could have a massive population, ready to travel over. Logistics is a non-issue.
[4] The one screen-shot makes it explicitly clear that they discover Europe first.
[5] Same issue faced with any voyage. Even then they could have discovered antibiotics already.
I'd just like to point out that there is evidence of tribal societies having discovered antibiotics.They could have already discovered the steam engine too! Hell they could have a nuclear navy! The possibilities are endless!
I'd just like to point out that there is evidence of tribal societies having discovered antibiotics.They could have already discovered the steam engine too! Hell they could have a nuclear navy! The possibilities are endless!