mediocrepoet
Philosoraptor in Residence
I think it's more likely that most would be jazzed at the chance to have a part in a big project and then their reaction to possibly having no actual influence will depend on the person and their character.Highly doubtful, nobody becomes an historian because of the money. While you have ideologues pushing agendas there, a lot of them are passionate about history and about "getting it right".I have a feeling historian consultants mostly enjoy the paycheck, the free vacations, and ignore everything else.
While you are correct, consider the following:
1. How much actual leverage these consultants actually have
2. What they are really hired for (it's so nobody gets offended)
3. The general landscape of media and it's relationship with "historical accuracy"
4. The inclination of the individual to be a reasonable business associate that doesn't come off as rude
So while the prestigious and morally correct thing is to fight back against the corporate powers that want to put Malians in Kingdom Cum 2: the re-Cuming, the actual reality is that angry, upstanding historians no longer accept consultation jobs in an industry as degenerate as video games, or they just do their job and give less of a fuck.
Welcome to the defeatism and its consequences.
Source: My ass + decades in academia.