Prime Junta
Guest
No, The magazine is just wider, that's all. The rest is literally the same as the PPsh-41 except the barrel is shorter.
No it's not. Half the barrel is behind the magazine, it even has a shroud. That makes no sense because the gun won't get hot behind the chamber. It also doesn't make any sense to put the trigger assembly so far back so that you need a separate assembly with some kind of weird mechanical linkage instead of just combining everything into a receiver.
It's a silly design. The only thing I can say in its defense is that it's not obviously un-shootable from an ergonomics point of view, it would be possible to fire it, hold it, and shoot it, even if the balance would be pretty wonky. As Ol' Willy said, it's a hack job done on an existing gun by somebody who has no idea how guns work.
Edit: even so, the thing that most gets my goat about the Arasaka gun isn't the mechanics, it's the ergonomics. What's with the bar that connects the stock with the grip, and who in their right mind would design a stock like that? I can't imagine how you'd be able to hold that effectively. It's like you'd designed a power drill with a grip that's thin as a pencil, or scissors with penny-sized finger loops. It's just not suited for human anatomy.
Last edited by a moderator: