Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Darkest Dungeon II

Fedora Master

STOP POSTING
Patron
Edgy
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
32,332
Good. Let them die.
 

quixotic

Learned
Joined
Sep 13, 2021
Messages
333
I know Behaviour Interactive and Red Hook are both retarded, but out of all the franchises they could’ve namedropped, they chose Dragon Age?
Yeah, they’re dead men walking.
 

KVVRR

Learned
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Messages
661
They're adding the abomination back? That's cool, it's the one character that I wanted them to add to the sequel.
 

KVVRR

Learned
Joined
Apr 28, 2020
Messages
661
They're adding the abomination back? That's cool, it's the one character that I wanted them to add to the sequel.
Just play the original, fam.
I never enjoyed the way the original managed the characters. I get the point of it being a revolving door and you shoving more and more people into the meatgrinder to get rid of an unfixable problem, but it's just really REALLY tedious to have to balance yourself around who's alive, who died, which of my 3 y characters is up and able to fight and high enough level to do so in x level dungeon, etc
The second game's more simplistic but a lot less tedious imo. And I like that I only can use one character class per run and keep them around for the next if they survive.
 

Axel_am

Exploring and Enjoying
Patron
Joined
Jul 23, 2023
Messages
751
Location
Buckkeep
Codex+ Now Streaming!
I hope they do something more with the DD art style. I've seen some games on Steam have started imitating it already, but it would be sweet if it's pushed even more. It would be a waste if we don't see something like a platformer with simillar aesthethics and vibes.

As for Darkest Dungeon - the name doesn't excite me anymore as it used to. I imagine a lot of people feel the same way too. And no adding of old classes is going to change that. DDII was mid at release and worse it felt overpriced and still feels overpriced even with the -40% price slash.
 

Tarkleigh

Learned
Patron
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Messages
494
Location
Germany
Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming!
I finally played and finished this in August and wanted to write down my thoughts here but kept forgetting about it - which should give you some idea about my enthusiasm for this game. As my avatar probably told you, I was a big fan of Darkest Dungeon 1 and played a lot of it, including all DLCs. Still, I completely bounced off Darkest Dungeon 2 the first time I tried it (last year) and even this time it was a very rough start. In the end it was an okay game and I did not regret playing it but this is a massive decline after the great experience I had with DD1.

With this out of the way, here is what I still remember about playing the game:
  • The biggest problem I had at first was the UI. It is much worse than in DD1 and often just shows cryptic symbols with no mouse-over or text explanation. So you see a lot of skills that say something like this "+50% CRIT when Target <cryptic symbol here>". This is terrible since there are maybe 8 different symbols to keep track off right from the beginning and while there is a glossary that maps text to symbols, it is not in the skill explanations. Combine this with the complex skills and combat crawled to a halt as I had to double-check what the skills do all the time. It was very frustrating as this problem is completely unnecessary and they could have just stuck to text (or text and symbols). It got better with time but still was my number one complaint
  • They got rid of the roster management which is a double-edged sword. It removes some grind and improves the game's flow but at the same time destroyes almost all meta-progression. As a result, the runs are much more random than before and you have far less options to tip the odds in your favor with proper preparation. Overall, I think this was a mistake as it can make the game quite frustrating if you get bad rolls a few times in a row. It also removes the incentive to do optional fights like the Shambler and erases the tension you feel all the time in DD1.
  • The relationships between heros suck but everybody already talked this to death, so let's skip it
  • The difficulty is very uneven. The first and third boss were difficult for me (with the Focussed Fault being by far the most difficult challenge in the whole playthrough), while others were a cake walk and the final boss was long but suprisingly easy. Overall, I think DD1 handled this much better
  • Enemy design and atmosphere are still good even though not quite one the same level as in DD1
  • Having Wayne June back as a narrator is great, but I find it quite confusing that he voices a completely different character
Wtih Red Hook being bought now, I don't think we will see a Darkest Dungeon 3 and at the moment, I am okay with this. They did excellent work with part one but it seems like this was a once in a lifetime moment.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom