Gragt
Arcane
60$ (talking of US $ of course) doesn't make 83€. No bloody way.
Seems like it. Funny thing, when I replied last time, I clicked the same link and it brought me to amazon, selling for 49€, but only sending out new stuff after June 8th. Now it links back to Apollo, selling for 85€ and only having one copy left and looking like a amazon product if you don't look carefully. Used to be you could separate amazon from third-party sellers at a glance...On the 'Kwan Amazon.com website this doesn't happen, the games being sold directly from Amazon come up first. So perhaps the confusion is caused by an error in the Amazon.de website?
Are you claiming that I did not have both the dial in auth and the SMS auth?
No, you had those. But neither of those are the physical or mobile authenticator, the main line of protection that is being referred to. The Dial-In and SMS are just nice additional layers of security to add to the physical or mobile.
It's becoming pretty apparent that our naming scheme might be causing some confusion, and I apologize for that. I'll bring the subject up with my management, so can we review both how the devices are named and how they are presented. If you have only one authenticator on your account, you want it to be the physical or mobile, not the dial-in or SMS.
In BlizzDefine "normal user stupidity" and how it applies to getting your account hacked and your character(s) being stripped bare.
Wow, these Blizztards really are in deep. What, does this idiot think someone hacked his password 7 years ago or something?No, that is my fault. Using the same password and email combination for 7 years on the internet is absolutely stupid. I'm not a stupid person, I don't lack common sense, and I generally make good decisions. This was bad judgment on my part, I know it, I own it, and I move on. That is what most of you should be doing instead of spewing out visceral comments towards Blizzard without any quantifiable information.Wait...really thats what you are claiming is your fault?? A password that has been secure for you for nearly 7 years?? Yea thats really not your fault for getting hacked, if your system is clean, and you didnt do anything but just play a game. Then yea not your fault but blizzards instead.I assumed, as many people do and against my better judgment, that my account had been inactive for so long I could continue its use with the password I've been using for the last 7 years and no authenticator. I knew better, and I ignored it. I now have the mobile authenticator, my new 12 character password, and am merely awaiting my restoration.
Last time I ever saw a massive game get a bunch of accounts hacked like this. They didnt say oh it was all end user. It ended up a unknown back door was on their end, they apologized to the gamers, explained what happened, help restore things for the gamers, gave away a few things, and fixed it. That was years and years ago, when companys were more willing to take blame and fix it then pass it off.
Too bad even this example will be spin-doctored by Blizztards. And what can be done ? From what I know, they will roll-back your character to a couple of hours/days ago after you put in a support ticket - but you can request a rollback only two or three times in total ? Love to hear how Blizzard will proceed on this, Ulminati if possible.
If Blizzard is smart, they might suspend the RMAH indefinitely instead of pushing ahead with it anyway while doing a hackjob of fixing the exploit in order to exploit maximum moniez.
Keep your fingers crossed.
"Blizzard delays Diablo III real-money auctions indefinitely"
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2012/05/blizzard-delays-diablo-iii-real-money-auctions-indefinitely/
This is honestly false; Diablo 3 has more game depth than both D1 and D2. You do a lot more in the combat and the enemies require you to utilize all the skills you are given. It would be wrong to say it has less depth than DS because DS already had less than D1/D2.
That said, the security problems are glaring. While I am inclined to write it off as MMORPG launch woes it'd be nice of Blizzactivison to remember that D1/D2 weren't MMORPGs to begin with.
And it was 83€ before they sold out. Now they obviously get the next batch in in June. That batch will go for 49€ (until it nears sold-out status again).
That means there were people willing to pay 83€ (while amazon was already pointing out at that time that other vendors sell for 49€). I stand by everything I said. And don't expect me to do your thinking for you next time.
I love how the user comments on that article are just pages of people defending blizzard and blaming the consumer. Here's hoping blizz paid for these agents. How can it be considered "fair play" to lose progress or be unable to play your single-player game? Never mind that your password was your cat's name and not a string of random digits, or that you didn't use external authenticating software, or that it doesn't happen to everyone, or that you hang out on the shady parts of the web, or that the hackers are the ones actually doing the damage -- we're still talking about a game being broken. You can compare it to save-games randomly getting corrupted for a sizable percentage of the player-base. For any other game I'm pretty sure there would be a patch out pronto or it would be off the shelves pretty fucking quick.
A very large portion of "neutral online commentors" are in fact either company employees, or employees of an another company that the commenting has been outsourced to.
I would rather idiots being compromised then millions of players playing the game for free offline, instead of simply not buying the game, at least every single player will PAY Blizzard for their product.