Excidium
P. banal
That has more to do with the state of the game industry in general than Skyrim specifically. Oblivion will be a decade old sooner than we notice
Fuck you Gaider, don't talk shit about things you're ignorant about. Looks like he inspired a rant.David Gaider @davidgaider
Nice to see how "please don't record this" evidently means "record the entire thing and post it online, but only because we asked nicely."
Gary Alexander @upsettingshorts
@davidgaider @Sylvf1 Aaryn encouraged us to share *everything* on social media, it was a very explicit invitation.
David Gaider @davidgaider
Evidently explicit permission was given for folks to share the PAX panel on social media. So be it. I retract my grousing.
You know what’s interesting?
David Gaider can insult fans, patronize fans, favour fans over others, invade fan space when he’s unwanted, drunkblog, encourage bullying, insist his headcanons are the only way fans are allowed to interpret Thedas lore and be biphobic as hell yet fans will still love and defend him.
Jennifer Hepler says she prefers the writing the games over playing games and fans go apeshit all over the internet - to the point Hepler was receiving death threats.
Isn’t it interesting how some Bioware writers are held to different standards than others?
wow sex in videogames panel. surely the highlight of the show.David Gaider @davidgaider 5h
Panel done. Relatively painless. I'm now free until the Sex in Videogames panel tonight.
His being on tumblr and making blog posts in reply to things he reads from DA-related tumblrs is considered invading their space by some. As for biphobia, I dunno. Maybe the way he talks about how romances are available to both sexes? The language he uses is very wishy-washy. Like he says he doesn't consider them playersexual but also refuses to write all of them as explicitly bi and tells people to shut up if they try to label them.Where did he "invade fan space" and act biphobic...ly?
The "fan space invasion" and "headcanon" parts seem to point to some fun drama. I guess some of the tumblr precious snowflakes can't take it when their Anders/Architect slash fictions are commented upon by the series head writer. Stop opressing, cis white dudes!Fuck you Gaider, don't talk shit about things you're ignorant about. Looks like he inspired a rant.
http://fearliath.tumblr.com/post/60004173429/you-know-whats-interesting-david-gaider-can
Years ago, Ridley Scott changed Blade Runner. He decided to change an ambiguous aspect of the central character to something not ambiguous at all. The movie that Blade Runner fans fell in love with because of that central uncertainty lost something because the author simply changed his mind years after the fact.Any reason why you wont tell us what JG said to Salt Upon Wounds?
I think that authors of content should leave the interpretive aspects of their narrative work alone once it goes out into the world for consumption. I think we should discuss it, argue about it, but we shouldn't try to re-frame it. It shouldn't really matter whether what's there is intentional or accidental. It's what's in the game and what the player experiences that matter.
Even describing, in broad strokes, what we had intended for Legion content was pretty distasteful, IMO. We had our shot to tell some stories. If I feel the need to scoot additional information at the audience outside of the content they paid money for, I'm just heaping failure upon failure -- made worse by asserting the importance of my opinions as the project director after the fact. My authority ended when the game went out the door. For better or worse, what's there is there.
You're in luck! Ridley Scott directly said that Deckard is a replicant in an interview. So if you thought your interpretation was in any way valid, he's solved that for you.sorry this keeps being brought up, but even with the recent final cut, the film is still ambiguous. it's never directly stated in the film that deckard is a replicant.the dream sequence is about as telling as the removed stock footage ending(which sucked
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/movies/30kapl.html?_r=2&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
This is exactly why I think making comments of that sort is terrible and insulting to the audience.
That's does not really apply to unfinished/continuously developed works. You know, like a video game trilogy after the second installment.The author is dead. Whatever does not explicitly exist in the material can be interpreted freely.
The winning move would be to become a better writer and work with better writers so that you're not writing schlock.The only winning move is not to play, Dave.
The only winning move is not to play, Dave.
but Draq that was already in vanilla skyrim wasnt it?At least Skyrim could be modded to make NPCs react to hits.
I don't really like the artisitic style myself, although it is a step up from DA2. But the graphics are very beautiful, it looks amazing actually.
Does seem more DA and DA2 (well, the demo anyway) on easy/normal like to me. Leave the default AI on, pick a party member you want to control, run around hitting things with abilities when off cooldown and have little trouble with most fights. The player on the video only seems to switch party members for 'fun' rather than necessity. Of course, it could be undertuned for staging purposes, not wanting to waste time with reloads. Doesn't seem active enough to be a Witcher 2 clone.Same old Dragon Age gameplay just like I said it would be.
It's a Witcher 2 clone with a rudimentary party control interface attached, just like I said it would be.
not enough rolling to mistake inquisitor for geraltDoes seem more DA and DA2 (well, the demo anyway) on easy/normal like to me. Leave the default AI on, pick a party member you want to control, run around hitting things with abilities when off cooldown and have little trouble with most fights. The player on the video only seems to switch party members for 'fun' rather than necessity. Of course, it could be undertuned for staging purposes, not wanting to waste time with reloads. Doesn't seem active enough to be a Witcher 2 clone.Same old Dragon Age gameplay just like I said it would be.
It's a Witcher 2 clone with a rudimentary party control interface attached, just like I said it would be.
I think it's telling that the doctors left.
More likely they reached the minimum time EA required them to stay on after purchase and left.Did we ever find out more about why that happened ?, or was it as simple as it seemed with them taking the fall for the massive failure that was DA 2 ?.