Dragon Age: Inquisition Pre-Release Thread

[norolim]

Hmm, interesting.
The damage threshhold is apparently pretty low on normal difficulty. Maybe nightmare difficulty doesn't have it all.

I wouldn't count on that. His answers were rather vague. I'm expecting more like: 80% at Casual, 60% at Normal, 40% at Hard and 20% at Nightmare.

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

and why do you fuckers even care about casual difficulty features? you retarded or what?

Now with added bonus of regenerated HP even while in combat.

source?

 

[Rake]

and why do you fuckers even care about casual difficulty features? you retarded or what?

Because in contrast with Sawyer,who balances the game for hard and then scales down, Bioware balances the game for normal, and then just inflates the HP and slaps random resistances the higher you go. That's why nightmare is more tedious than difficult.

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

thats pretty much true with da2 , in origins nightmare was the only difficulty you should be playing. the rest was piss easy

edit.
well lets wait for sawyer game and play it a bit before we make it a fucking holy grail of crpg

 

[Grunker]

and why do you fuckers even care about casual difficulty features? you retarded or what?

Because in contrast with Sawyer,who balances the game for hard and then scales down, Bioware balances the game for normal, and then just inflates the HP and slaps random resistances the higher you go. That's why nightmare is more tedious than difficult.

TBH, friendly fire and such non-linear difficulty increases are pretty sophisticated compared to most games...

 

[Storyfag]

Now with added bonus of regenerated HP even while in combat.

source?

There is no source. My entire post was speculative, as indicated by the word "probably" at the start, you fucktard.

 

[Rake]

well lets wait for sawyer game and play it a bit before we make it a fucking holy grail of crpg

You confused me with Roguey. While i like this aspect of PE(balanced for hard), i don't like all Sawyer's design desisions, and i don't expect PE to be the holy grail of RPGs.
But i seriously don't expect DA:I to have chalenging tactical combat. I will have to see it to believe it

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

Now with added bonus of regenerated HP even while in combat.

source?

There is no source. My entire post was speculative, as indicated by the word "probably" at the start, you fucktard.

yes make up more bullshit on your own you fucking moron and than claim its only speculation.

 

[Storyfag]

Now with added bonus of regenerated HP even while in combat.

source?

There is no source. My entire post was speculative, as indicated by the word "probably" at the start, you fucktard.

yes make up more bullshit on your own you fucking moron and than claim its only speculation.

Gods, you ARE retarded. Cannot into reading, or something? Run along to Bioware Social now. Adults are DISCUSS!ing grown up things here.

Guys, has anyone ELSE had ANY doubts that my post regarding revival was entirelly speculative?

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

no you fucktard
>he asked about reviving
>you answered that it will be probably like in da: o
>than in next sentence you wrote out of your ass that there will be regenerating health while in combat which was not present in da: o /da2 and your "speculation" contradicts what we heard so far from bioware.

thats why you moron i asked for source on regenerating health in combat. and asking for support in bioware hate thread is kind of gay you fucking faggot. at least try to trash biowhore on your own

 

[Storyfag]

>than in next sentence you wrote out of your ass that there will be regenerating health while in combat which was not present in da: o /da2 and your "speculation" contradicts what we heard so far from bioware.

It doesn't contradict their marketpseak at all, you dumbfuck. When they say:

There will be a threshold that you will heal back to after combat. This threshold will change at different difficulties. #DAI
likely a very small one so that revived characters aren't literally at 1hp

The deduction that upon revival characters will have regenerated to this threshold isn't really a contradiction.

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

and now treshold of 10-20% of your life is health regen

Now with added bonus of regenerated HP even while in combat.

your own words you stupid fuck

 

[Storyfag]

Do you understand the difference between "regenerating" and "regenerated"?

English doesn't scale to your level.

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

...not sure but i do now what means while in combat

 

[Roguey]

DA:O and 2 actually had health regenerate during combat, but it was slow enough to be almost unnoticeable. There were multiple ways of boosting it a bit, at least in Origins.

thats pretty much true with da2 , in origins nightmare was the only difficulty you should be playing. the rest was piss easy

True 'nough
http://dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Difficulty_settings_(Origins)
http://dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Difficulty_settings_(Dragon_Age_II)

The only unfair advantage enemies get on Nightmare is a very slight resistance bonus, meaning it might take you one more hit to kill them. The "damage threshold" thing is the amount of damage an enemy has to do to you before the game downscales it, so that just makes it more fair. Meanwhile in II you get the standard lazy "more health, more damage, more accuracy, more enemy health regeneration." The only good difficulty increases are the ones that reduce enemy cooldowns and the durations they're effected by your spells.

 

[Storyfag]

...not sure but i do now what means while in combat

Yes, because Bio's marketspeak basically means: when characters are revived, they will regenerate some hp, so as not to be stuck at 1hp. If there will be revival spells usable in combat, it is only logical to assume that the aforementioned instantenaous threshold regeneration will be also happening in combat.

Idiot.

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

...not sure but i do now what means while in combat

Yes, because Bio's marketspeak basically means: when characters are revived, they will regenerate some hp, so as not to be stuck at 1hp. If there will be revival spells usable in combat, it is only logical to assume that the aforementioned instantenaous threshold regeneration will be also happening in combat.

Idiot.

and with that treshhold you are still stuck at 10/20% of you life during and after the combat. you want full hp? use spells/limited potions. now compare it to da: origins where you life regenerated to 100% in seconds after the fight or witcher 2 where you have to wait 10 minutes standing like a retard in the middle of a fucking forest...

 

[Storyfag]

...not sure but i do now what means while in combat

Yes, because Bio's marketspeak basically means: when characters are revived, they will regenerate some hp, so as not to be stuck at 1hp. If there will be revival spells usable in combat, it is only logical to assume that the aforementioned instantenaous threshold regeneration will be also happening in combat.

Idiot.

and with that treshhold you are still stuck at 10/20% of you life during and after the combat. you want full hp? use spells/limited potions. now compare it to da: origins where you life regenerated to 100% in seconds after the fight or witcher 2 where you have to wait 10 minutes standing like a retard in the middle of a fucking forest...

Never claimed otherwise...

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

so we arguing over semantics or what?

 

[Volourn]

"isn't BG2 was the last bioware game where your characters could actually die in combat?"

NWN.


"the rest was piss easy"

I bet your deifnition of 'piss easy' is unfactuall. I bet you died multiple times.

 

[meanwhileInPoland]

"the rest was piss easy"

I bet your deifnition of 'piss easy' is unfactuall. I bet you died multiple times.

i died a lot on my first blind playthrough on nightmare before i new i could abuse cone of cold or mana clash and still finished the game in 4 or 5 days. i never died on casual/normal/hard but i played that only first couple hours before i switched to nightmare.
on 2nd and third run on nightmare i died couple times and probably only to broodmother from awakening and harvester from dlc, at least those fights i remember.(and sir cautrien but i fought her like a man without hidding and kitting)

casual/normal are piss easy for anyone who played at least baldurs gate. hard was ok until you learned mechanic of game better. on last run playing as a shield+sword warrior with guardian/spirit warrior/templar specs i could finish game playing blindfolded with custom tactics preset.:patriot:

 

[Volourn]

You are lying. Bg was easier.

 

[Rake]

You are lying. Bg was easier.

 

[Stainless Veteran]

You are lying. Bg was easier.

No Volly, it's just your alzheimer's is getting worse.

 

[Volourn]

I wish I had Alzheimers. that way i could forget all the retarted shit I've seen on the internet. Not your comment b/c thatw as actually chuckles worthy.

But, yes, I found BG easier.Outside of the misfortune of 1 hit kills at level that are near impossible outside of luck, BG is tons easier than the DA games. Now if you micromanage all of your aprty in DA series then it becomes easier and elss likely to die. But, in BG series, you don't even have to micro manage your party outside of 'boss'/ 'top tier' encounters to walk through. My top strategy for shit vioes is BG to en mass rush attack them with my whole aprty including the mage w/o fear of dying. Can't do that in DA series. You have to use your abilities. If you go in with a strategy in DA you will do well. if you rush in for shits and goggles you will be in troubkle.

FACT.