-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Dragon Age: Inquisition Pre-Release Thread
- Thread starter Wirdschowerdn
- Start date
Necroscope
Arcane
Given their audience Bioware's answear to "you can climb it" should be "you can fuck it".
OR:
Fantasy, for us, is a gay on trannyback running around and choppingthat meat things.
OR:
Fantasy, for us, is a gay on trannyback running around and chopping
kris
Arcane
I could only watch that muted. I tried putting on sounds again, but then some random cheers and strange sounds came out from the audience. It was freaking scary.
I don't see the problem with a female dwarf, they're exactly like humans except they're the perfect height.
Exactly the female Dwarves looks more of proper wymyn than anorectic dress hangers and men with tits Manling wymyn were... not to mention pedophile delight elves.
So my impreshuns:
- audience sounds like Americans at a game con, and?
- the combat seems to be tactical AND visceral at the same time; well, at least the tactical element was preserved; I dislike the "visceraly" exagarated combat movements speed but I'm certainly not surprised
- the destructibility is just a gimmick, not giving a fuck
- art direction is generic but not rage inducing (flaming sword is cool though)
- there is no automatic healt regen
- limited resources
- seamless world, no loadscreens
- no enemy level scaling :D
- no demented corridors anymore :Yeeeeaaaah!:
No details about character development, but not holding any breath, dumbing down inevitable.
All in all, it could be a pretty playable console RPG.
- audience sounds like Americans at a game con, and?
- the combat seems to be tactical AND visceral at the same time; well, at least the tactical element was preserved; I dislike the "visceraly" exagarated combat movements speed but I'm certainly not surprised
- the destructibility is just a gimmick, not giving a fuck
- art direction is generic but not rage inducing
(flaming sword is cool though)- there is no automatic healt regen
- limited resources
- seamless world, no loadscreens
- no enemy level scaling :D
- no demented corridors anymore :Yeeeeaaaah!:
No details about character development, but not holding any breath, dumbing down inevitable.
All in all, it could be a pretty playable console RPG.
Chaotic_Heretic
Arcane
I want more classes than "warrior" "Rogue" "Mage", but then again I don't want Gaider's faggot writing and Laidlaw's design either.
Seems like you don't want a Bioware game.
This is a common issue.
Top men are working around the clock to fix it.
This is a common issue.
Top men are working around the clock to fix it.
I think anyone who wants to create a "dark fantasy" world and be taken seriously must first omit dwarves.
Gaider, fucking get rid of these comedian shrink-Scots already!
Gaider, fucking get rid of these comedian shrink-Scots already!
Jashiin
Arcane
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2012
- Messages
- 1,440
Dreaad
Arcane
More like
Space Satan
Arcane
https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/DAIcombatgameplay
Lol, they made a survey
Lol, they made a survey
Space Satan
Arcane
You can always give people photoshopped survey results.
Edward_R_Murrow
Arcane
Survey time!
Just the basics, you know.
I'm not really proud of this...or am I?
I *know* what is important
.
Best party members since Aerie.
I think this is solid advice...
Just the basics, you know.
I'm not really proud of this...or am I?
I *know* what is important
.
Best party members since Aerie.
I think this is solid advice...
:D
Surveyed the survey, but I'm pretty sure thousands of biodrones already filled that with shit.
Filled it in also. Here's my comment at the end:
"Challenge does not imply high hp levels of enemies. The most important aspect of game challenge is deadliness of combat, requiring tactical thinking to get through situations.
Also, if you want me to give a shit about combat in the first place make sure you're not making a tolkien ripoff populated with disney characters. I care about quality first and foremost. If you want my purchase and respect, you should get back into your Mass Effect 1 mindset. Even then I must say you have gaping flaws in design. Main characters shouldn't be called awesome and super capable in the first few minutes. Ever heard of character progression?
Antagonists are just as important as main characters. Do not relegate them to the background as you did in ME2.
That whole game was incoherent and badldy written. Killing off the main character at the start, only for it not to mean a thing? Contradicting yourself when you try to fix your bad mistakes in the sequel by saying that shepard still had his helmet, when that is a COLLECTIBLE in ME2? I could go on and on, but I don't think it's any use. I can only give you the advise to fire your entire writing department as well as all lead designers, and get some people in there who can think for themselves and care for quality first and foremost."
"Challenge does not imply high hp levels of enemies. The most important aspect of game challenge is deadliness of combat, requiring tactical thinking to get through situations.
Also, if you want me to give a shit about combat in the first place make sure you're not making a tolkien ripoff populated with disney characters. I care about quality first and foremost. If you want my purchase and respect, you should get back into your Mass Effect 1 mindset. Even then I must say you have gaping flaws in design. Main characters shouldn't be called awesome and super capable in the first few minutes. Ever heard of character progression?
Antagonists are just as important as main characters. Do not relegate them to the background as you did in ME2.
That whole game was incoherent and badldy written. Killing off the main character at the start, only for it not to mean a thing? Contradicting yourself when you try to fix your bad mistakes in the sequel by saying that shepard still had his helmet, when that is a COLLECTIBLE in ME2? I could go on and on, but I don't think it's any use. I can only give you the advise to fire your entire writing department as well as all lead designers, and get some people in there who can think for themselves and care for quality first and foremost."
I don't care enough for their gayelf shit to fill any Survey; game will suck anyway.
Yeah, I wouldn't have filled it in either since it's quite a silly survey. But I was bored.
It's telling that they don't have an option for good writing, but they do have one for 'epic storyline'.
It's telling that they don't have an option for good writing, but they do have one for 'epic storyline'.
Oesophagus
Arcane
Yeah, I wouldn't have filled it in either since it's quite a silly survey. But I was bored.
It's telling that they don't have an option for good writing, but they do have one for 'epic storyline'.
Doesn't matter if it's well written as long as you can save the known universe with your magical penis that everyone wants
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.