I'm remembering shit from years ago but I think things go more or less like this:In fact, it's starting to increasingly look like the Maker is just a distorted memory of the king of the Evanuris, and probably Andraste was possessed by the spirit of the Evanuris queen or whatever. The elves are literally behind everything! Such creativity!
Do not redeem anon! Do not!What about Isabella in DA2, she is definitely redeemable
Do not redeem anon! Do not!What about Isabella in DA2, she is definitely redeemable
What about Isabella in DA2, she is definitely redeemable
They did want multi player anon over single player anon but they did zero player anon! They did!Modern day Bioware is all Bioware's own doing. Read a few articles about the development of Anthem; EA gave them a blank check and Bioware's leadership completely fucked things up without EA's intervention.
That's an interesting idea, that I don't think is anywhere in DA.Those Elven Gods achieved true immortality - inability to be destroyed - by somehow using Dragons as their phylacteries.
Except, the darkspawn taint seems to have been inside the Not-So-Golden City, in the fade, and turned the magisters into darkspawn, and they subsequently corrupted the dragon gods... apparently. No sign of the Evanuris in there, as far as Corypheus can remember.Those humans would learn magic from their connection to the Dragons and would be used in an attempt to free the Evanuris from their prison. Doing so allowed the Darkspawn to find them and corrupt their Dragons.
Another weird idea that is not anywhere in the lore. Archdemons don't automatically turn into "old god child", that was a special thing created for the fifth archdemon by Flemeth (depending on player choice). Normally their souls are annihilated.The first of the corrupted Dragons to fall, Dumat, is said to have been killed around the time Andraste was born. She would therefore be an Old God child
It's nothing confirmed. We know that Corypheus used the Archdemon as a phylactery. And we know the Evanuris were somehow immortal. There's indications that they harnessed dragons somehow and I believe that Solas speaks at one point of Corypheus having discovered 'the' secret of immortality. Wether it's all one and the same thing we cannot know at this point.That's an interesting idea, that I don't think is anywhere in DA.
Maybe, maybe not. Corypheus' testimony leaves a lot of room for clarification. He saw the throne of God and it was empty. The City itself was always dark, it's golden sheen from afar a mere illusion. But what exactly any of this means is up in the air. What we do know about the Darkspawn taint itself however connects back to the Titans. They are the 'Stone' which sings to the Dwarves in the same way that the Taint sings to the Darkspawn. Both the Darkspawn and the Ancient Dwarves seem to form a hivemind around that. The Titans are the source of Lyrium and the Darkspawn corrupt that into Red Lyrium. And we know that when the Elven Gods killed a Titan and mined it's body for lyrium they unleashed something fierce from deep within the earth. These things are likely connected. How exactly we cannot know.Except, the darkspawn taint seems to have been inside the Not-So-Golden City, in the fade, and turned the magisters into darkspawn, and they subsequently corrupted the dragon gods... apparently. No sign of the Evanuris in there, as far as Corypheus can remember.
That is a widespread old theory based around the fact that Andraste was born around the same time Dumat died, the fact that her life was guided by figures that are similar to the witches of the wild, and how nowhere it appears was it recorded which hero slayed Dumat. It is also based around certain revelations that the witches of the wild and Flemeth have been manipulating history from behind the scenes since forever and that Solas was most likely Shartan. As such the Dark Ritual from DA:O's could have been performed back then.Another weird idea that is not anywhere in the lore. Archdemons don't automatically turn into "old god child", that was a special thing created for the fifth archdemon by Flemeth (depending on player choice). Normally their souls are annihilated.
There are indications of that and this would definitely be the single biggest evidence of how terrible it is to constantly refer back to the elven gods. But one thing that makes Andraste seem like a distinct figure from Flemeth and Mythal is that Flemeth's line can give birth to sons. As in, Morrigan can. But Andraste's line is mythologized as being only women. Plus Flemeth/Mythal and Solas/Fen'harel/Shartan have been around since before Andraste. Hence the idea that her birth was engineered similar via Dumat's death.Also, the lore behind Andraste seems to suggest that she was possessed by a (fragment of the) spirit of an Evanuris, probably Mythal.
Isabela's rivalry path is literally about molding her to be less selfish and more aware of the consequences of her actions. DA2's companions are pretty terrible people, but it gives you plenty of opportunities to "call them out" on it.DA2 went out of their way of making most companions unlikable idiots that couldn't stand being called out for their behavior that screwed over other people.
Not that I think it's Isabela's fault anyway. Not her fault the Qunari decided to go full carnage on an entire city over some stupid book.
That's the one thing about Dragon Age 2 that I always felt was pretty spot on. I remember Gaider saying back then that they didn't try to write characters everybody would like, but made an effort to let you call them out on their worse ideas. I didn't make it to DA2's chapter 2, but I distinctly remember a scene where Fenris is like 'you don't know my p a i n' and my character's response was along the lines of 'of course not you retard we just met'.Isabela's rivalry path is literally about molding her to be less selfish and more aware of the consequences of her actions. DA2's companions are pretty terrible people, but it gives you plenty of opportunities to "call them out" on it.DA2 went out of their way of making most companions unlikable idiots that couldn't stand being called out for their behavior that screwed over other people.
Was it the "heroic", "humorous", or "angry" response type?my character's response was along the lines of 'of course not you retard we just met'.
Positive it was the angry one. I think.Was it the "heroic", "humorous", or "angry" response type?my character's response was along the lines of 'of course not you retard we just met'.
Assuming I'm right about half of this the real problem, to me, isn't that the setting likes to demystify itself. It's that every time it does so it points to this rather sleek and straightforward story of how everything went down. It's an ancient conspiracy by an Elven God and Witches and Bishops and the like to try and redeem or at least survive the original sins of those ancient elven gods. This leaves no room for doubt, faith or an absentee God that does not seem to but could be I dunno intervening in the world.
What! Elder Scrolls lore is based schizokino anon and you can distinction anon schizokino author anon from other POPAMOLE fantasy lore contributor author anon but I do CHALLENGE you anon distinction Dragon Age author lore anon from other lore contributor author anon because it is all from same Canadia California AIDS hovel! It is!i find it amusing that the Elder scrolls is literally just a bunch of conflicting nonsense written by authors with biases on purpose and everyone goes "yay! deep lore!" and Dragon age does the exact same thing and people scream that the lore is being "raped" or whatever. ya'll dont know what you want
Nonsense? Read the Bhagavad Gita loser.i find it amusing that the Elder scrolls is literally just a bunch of conflicting nonsense written by authors with biases on purpose and everyone goes "yay! deep lore!" and Dragon age does the exact same thing and people scream that the lore is being "raped" or whatever. ya'll dont know what you want
Elder Scrolls has consistency in it's tone and atmosphere. Inconsistency in lore is excused by making sources of information within the game unreliable or biased.i find it amusing that the Elder scrolls is literally just a bunch of conflicting nonsense written by authors with biases on purpose and everyone goes "yay! deep lore!" and Dragon age does the exact same thing and people scream that the lore is being "raped" or whatever. ya'll dont know what you want
Dragon Age went from 'serious dark fantasy' to 'wacky adventures of castle "queer".
Elder Scrolls lore is also, frankly, just much more original and idiosyncratic. Most fantasy worlds pull from a pretty narrow set of influences, and tend to have races act as stand ins for real life cultures. Or just be a generic synthesis of many similar cultures. I'm sure there are similarities between the Dunmer culture and irl ones but at no point in Morrowind did I feel like I was experiencing a reskin of something from real life. Whereas in Dragon Age we have shit like humans oppressing elves as a metaphor for racism, and elves as a representative of native Americans, and magic lobotomies for dangerous mages, and magical conversion therapy, and what is basically the Catholic church. Elder Scrolls is pretty much always a believable world, because it isn't some sort of allegory for real life, and it's referential aspects are referential towards much more obscure material or itself.i find it amusing that the Elder scrolls is literally just a bunch of conflicting nonsense written by authors with biases on purpose and everyone goes "yay! deep lore!" and Dragon age does the exact same thing and people scream that the lore is being "raped" or whatever. ya'll dont know what you want