Daddy issues. The confirmation is the only thing they're actually looking for in these games. It doesn't matter how bad the game is, as long as some group of people can tell you "yeah it's a good thing you're playing this, good boy". And with time, a small group is not enough, and everyone must start approving of your decisions, otherwise you're no longer in a safe space.
Made-up gender-neutral pronouns.
Low self esteem.
It's a holdover from evolution. Back then, if everyone fucking hate the other tribe/city/state/country/empire, you should probably go in line and help out else you'll hold back the group. It's not a matter of right or wrong, it's a matter of the group's survival.
That was my thought as well. Why does this... individual care about my views on the game they're playing? I certainly don't feel like I need their approval to have fun.
They simply don't understand the meaning of the word.
It indeed is. And didn't that shill reviewer morhimer, moralisar, morontimer or whatever his name was talk about builds, getting defined by items. How are you supposed to do that? Just pick up really carefully only those chests that contain the stuff you need for your "build"?
It sounds retarded, the following would be the correct translation:Anyone speaks French here? Looks like its also butchered in that language
The most prestigious Codexers have detested Bioware since 1998 and would be happy to denigrate their latest game regardless of its commercial or critical success. 
Doing the exact same thing in the bg3 pre and post release thread?
I think everybody here is happy the mainstream is rejecting that piece of shit.
Even if someone from Bioware claimed that mages vs templars was about gun control, it is far enough removed from it that it can be generalized and a parallel drawn with other political conflicts. Abstract ideals of "restraint" and "liberality" run through many of the divisions of today's world such as economy, sexuality, individual and group rights etc.
